Supreme Court will not hear New York gun rights case
The Supreme Court left in doubt Monday whether gun owners have a Second Amendment right to carry a firearm in public.
Join the discussion below, or Read more at The Washington Post.
#1 Apr 16, 2013
Like a criminal with a weapon is going to care that there is a law prohibiting there gun in public.
All that will do is cause another situation like Newtown to happen because the good law -abiding citizens because of a stupid law that the public doesn't want anyway would prohibit there right to defend and protect themselves.
Really, how many people other than the politics and media actually want gun control???
It's nothing more than the big wigs trying to stay in the spotlight and have control.
Note to bigwigs the PUBLIC IS NOT STUPID.
LEAVE OUR GUN RIGHTS ALONE.
THESE ARE THE SAME PEOPLE WHO TRAINED THE TERRORIST FROM 9/11 how to fly and now they want to take awaY peoples rights I don't like or support them.
EVERY LEGISLATURE SHOULD HAVE TO SERVE BY PRIVELAGE AND HONOR NOT FOR MONEY.
EVERY PERSON WHO WORKS A REAL JOB AT AN HOURLY RATE Should have the first option to serve
OUr system needs reformd all together
Let the people make our laws not the government
#2 Apr 17, 2013
LET THE PEOPLE MAKE THE LAWS NOT THE GOVERNMENT.
NO ONE WANTS GUN CONTROL.
AT LEAST NOT FOR LAW-ABIDING CITIZENS.
BUT WAIT THERE ALREADY IS A LAW PROHIBITING FELONS FROM USING/OWNING GUNS AND WE SEE HOW THAT IS WORKING FOR THE PEOPLE AGAIN CRIMINALS DON'T CARE ABOUT FOLLOWING LAWS
THE ONLY THING GUN LAWS WOULD DO IS TAKE AWAY THE RIGHTS OF INNOCENT LAW-ABIDING PEOPLE, THE RIGHT THEY HAVE TO PROTECTION
#3 Apr 17, 2013
What kind of stories do you like,I got a cool website that you can read many kinds of stories and magazines.----http://www.pornc c.org
#4 Apr 17, 2013
What media outfit or public office do you come from?
Affraid the greedy and corrupt politians will lose there salary to a hard working and honest american who knows the meaning of a hard days work?
#5 Apr 18, 2013
The Justices should have to live by those laws before they are passed, you know as a trial and see if they like having no protection or security.
That's what this case is all about control.
If it wasnt no one would care if a good LAW-ABIDING CITIZEN had a gun in pblic.
IMPEACH THE BIG WIG JUSTICES WHO TRY TO CHANGE OUR RIGHTS.
Come on NRA that would protect our rights.
You'd have thousands of volenteers to help do that I don't see any supporters except the favored NEWOWN FAMILYS in support of this gun crap.
THINK TWICe WHO WE ELECT AND WHAT PEOPLE ASK FOR.
ALL PARENTS OF NEWTOWN KIDS SHOULD BE STANDING UP FOR THE RIGHTS OF PEOPOLE TO PROtect themselves but those rich people have never been outside there comfortzone they don't relieze outside of there town there are places that arn't so great that even a child is not safe in there neighborhoods.
People die everyday you don't see News media and other OFFICIALS favoring them or even presenting/esscorting them to washington.
The media HERE TODAY IS LIKE NAZI GERMANY.
THEY CONTROL WHAT THE PEOPLE ARE PRESENTED WITH.
THank GOd for TOPIX
Why not just supprot Background checks then it's not affecting your rights??
Why make it harder for good people??4
Why not just the bad people who aren't suppossed to have them to begin with
Add your comments below
|Four women face prostitution charges in York (Oct '12)||Mar 19||no justice||14|
|How York High became both fortress and haven||Mar 16||Unreal||1|
|Food list grows for WIC users (Oct '09)||Mar 15||Miranda Jordan||49|
|Lost Civil War gold in Pennsylvania woods? (Mar '08)||Mar 13||That guy||34|
|Police seek York 'armed and dangerous' suspect||Mar 12||Unreal||1|
|Zach Witman: 'Take a second look' (Dec '10)||Feb 27||Devon||549|
|ne pa||Feb 25||chuck||1|
Find what you want!
Search Spry Forum Now
Copyright © 2018 Topix LLC