Groups study improving train service
Join the discussion below, or Read more at Brattleboro Reformer.
#1 May 26, 2009
"According to Brennan, the public is overwhelmingly in favor of the project. However, residents in Amherst and Palmer have expressed concern because they are potentially losing an income source. "
It's called progress, deal with it.
#2 Jun 2, 2009
The one hour of employee time saved is just small change.
Today each train requires a engine at both ends (TWO engines) to reverse direction in Palmer. The river route would require only 1 engine on both the north bound and south bound train each day. That's 2 multi-million dollar engines no longer needed - not exactly a trivial saving.
Add your comments below
|HCRS compensation package angers lawmakers||Mar '15||tanya||2|
|UHSD 27 budget to go up less than 1 percent des...||Mar '15||Andrew Andrews||1|
|Athens voters reject first-ever Town Plan||Mar '15||Diogenes Smith||1|
|Lawmakers praise gov's pitch for road, ag funding (Jan '14)||Feb '15||other||5|
|why does brenda darling get away selling her pa... (Mar '09)||Jan '15||Det Columbo||287|
|If the rich are getting richer, what's happenin... (Apr '14)||Jan '15||Jaimie||9|
|Live Music at the Pizza Stone||Jan '15||reverie22||1|
Find what you want!
Search Springfield Forum Now
Copyright © 2015 Topix LLC