Mitt Romney should be in prison instead of the White House

Posted in the Springfield Forum

First Prev
of 4
Next Last
Send Romney to Prison

Columbia, MO

#1 Aug 24, 2012
The reports are starting to come in from leaked documents from Switzerland.
cometland

United States

#2 Aug 25, 2012
Yet you were either unable to, or too lazy to provide this information in your post.
Send Romney to Prison

Columbia, MO

#4 Aug 28, 2012
cometland wrote:
Yet you were either unable to, or too lazy to provide this information in your post.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/ameri...
cometland

United States

#5 Aug 29, 2012
Send Romney to Prison wrote:
You are kidding, right?

1) You say "reports" are starting to come out from leaked Swiss documents. Your link only speaks of one report, and Switzerland is not referenced anywhere as a source.

2) The link provided insinuates nothing to support any wrongdoing or to suggest Romney belongs in prison, as your username suggests.

3) I would venture to say that there isn't a single person with his wealth that doesn't have holdings in a number of foreign entities. Hell, my company 401k invests in several international companies from China to South America.

4) The link provided carries a UK suffix. This "smoking gun" you provided has escaped the notice of our national media after how many days?

Something tells me you think that Romney also didn't pay any / enough taxes over the last decade, and that he "stole" his fortune by wantonly shutting down companies and sending all the jobs overseas. What's scary is that there's a lot more like you out there.
Mary Mary

Columbus, OH

#7 Sep 3, 2012
Stupid libtard.
Send Romney to prison

Columbia, MO

#9 Sep 19, 2012
Yes I'm on welfare I get a little social security check once a month after working my ass off and paying a higher tax rate all my life than Mutt Romney ever paid. If you want the rich to steal all of the taxes you pay then elect Mutt Romney. Go to hell Koch Suckers.
smellingfine

Springfield, MO

#10 Sep 19, 2012
Send Romney to prison wrote:
Yes I'm on welfare I get a little social security check once a month after working my ass off and paying a higher tax rate all my life than Mutt Romney ever paid. If you want the rich to steal all of the taxes you pay then elect Mutt Romney. Go to hell Koch Suckers.
People who receive checks from the government should not be entitled to an opinion and most definitely should not be allowed to vote. Conflict of interest and such.
Send Romney to prison

Columbia, MO

#11 Sep 19, 2012
Looking out for your own interest is not a conflict. Its survival. Elitist like you wouldn't understand.
aur56

Aurora, MO

#12 Sep 19, 2012
Social security is NOT welfare, it's a right that you've paid into your entire working life and upon your retirement it's for your use.Is NOT welfare be any means....
cometland

United States

#13 Sep 19, 2012
Send Romney to prison wrote:
Yes I'm on welfare I get a little social security check once a month after working my ass off and paying a higher tax rate all my life than Mutt Romney ever paid. If you want the rich to steal all of the taxes you pay then elect Mutt Romney. Go to hell Koch Suckers.
Sorry, bud, but you don't pay near the tax rate ol' Mitt has in his life. Furthermore, if you're collecting a government entitlement check, then you most definitely fall into the half of this country that does not pay federal income tax.
Send Romney to prison

Columbia, MO

#16 Sep 19, 2012
cometland wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry, bud, but you don't pay near the tax rate ol' Mitt has in his life. Furthermore, if you're collecting a government entitlement check, then you most definitely fall into the half of this country that does not pay federal income tax.
Hey bud, I paid a higher rate than Mitt, even you ignorant SOBs pays a higher rate than he does. And you DAMN right I'm entitled to my little social security check. If you or Mitt and his rich billionaire friends take that away from us then me and millions like me will not hesitate to exercise our 2nd amendment rights to remove those responsible from the face of the earth.
Send Romney to prison

Columbia, MO

#17 Sep 19, 2012
cometland wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry, bud, but you don't pay near the tax rate ol' Mitt has in his life. Furthermore, if you're collecting a government entitlement check, then you most definitely fall into the half of this country that does not pay federal income tax.
You rich elitists have no idea how screwed you are.
Send Romeny to prison

Columbia, MO

#19 Sep 19, 2012
Big White Daddy wrote:
<quoted text>
I hate you welfare mutts.
SO... I'm a welfare mutt for collecting social security and you hate me. I suppose you hate all the service men and women that collect goverment checks as well. I suppose you hate all the retired people on social security as well. I guess you are such an elitist rich snob that none of your family ever needed social security.

Hatred is a disease of the rich and privileged that have never had to work in their life. You are doomed to a miserable hateful life.
Nothing I could say to you could possbibly make you more miserable an excuse for a human than you already know you are yourself.
Bag of Bones

Forsyth, MO

#20 Sep 20, 2012
For decades BOTH POLITICAL PARTIES have fuched up the U.S. Tax Code. I believe it's now over 70,000 pages in length.

The reason the wealthy pay less that you do is because of the "Golden Rule". He who has the gold...

Rather than a fair, tax collection system, the Tax Code has become a bloated, tax AVOIDANCE document. It needs to be scrapped and condensed to about 100 pages or less.

But good luck with that.* see Golden Rule above.

All the talk about taxes is nothing more than class envy. If the wealthy pay less, it's not THEIR fault, it's the politicians that made/make the Tax Code.

Those who can afford it ( wealthy) just hire good tax attorneys/advisors.

YOU can start a change by electing politicians that will FIX the flawed U.S. Tax Code ( that is - if you can find one ).
cometland

United States

#21 Sep 20, 2012
Send Romney to prison wrote:
<quoted text>Hey bud, I paid a higher rate than Mitt, even you ignorant SOBs pays a higher rate than he does. And you DAMN right I'm entitled to my little social security check. If you or Mitt and his rich billionaire friends take that away from us then me and millions like me will not hesitate to exercise our 2nd amendment rights to remove those responsible from the face of the earth.
Couple of things....Why would I have a problem with service people "collecting government checks"? Or retired people that have paid in? They are entitled. They work / worked for that money. I have a problem with people that are chronic users of government assistance, the folks that for years can't seem to get their shit together. Mostly, I have a problem with people that contribute nothing, yet feel entitled to be the most vocal about others not paying their fair share.

Second, you threaten violence if Mitt or his friends "take that away from me". Take what? Absolutely nobody has proposed taking anything away from you.

Lastly, if you're gonna run that tired game that ol' Mitt didn't pay proper taxes, at least brush up on your tax law. Mitt's income derives from long term investments. The rate of taxation on that type of income is what he paid. Those dividends are taxed once at distribution and again at collection. The effective amount of tax paid by both parties on that money is somewhere between 30 & 35%. You're in over your head here.
cometland

United States

#22 Sep 20, 2012
Send Romney to prison wrote:
Looking out for your own interest is not a conflict. Its survival. Elitist like you wouldn't understand.
What a nice world you live in. Looking out for YOUR own interests is survival, not conflict. If some guy gets rich looking out for HIS own interests, then he's a bad guy that must have gotten there at someone else's expense. Sounds like you despise the rich not for what they have, but because you aren't one of them.
Send Romney to Prison

Columbia, MO

#23 Sep 20, 2012
cometland wrote:
<quoted text>
What a nice world you live in. Looking out for YOUR own interests is survival, not conflict. If some guy gets rich looking out for HIS own interests, then he's a bad guy that must have gotten there at someone else's expense. Sounds like you despise the rich not for what they have, but because you aren't one of them.
I didn't realize Cometland and Big White Daddy are one and the same mmmmm .....either way, you elect the Mutt and he cuts my social security you all will have hell to pay. Since I no longer pay income tax I could give a crap if he raises your taxes to 50% and cuts his and his rich buddies to 5%. But....if he cuts my social security to make up the difference.....HELL will see lots of new arrivals. And I still think he should go to prison for stealing from all of us by hiding all his assests out of the country. If thats the kind of patriot you rich aszholes want to ruin your country then f***ing vote for him.
cometland

Springfield, MO

#24 Sep 21, 2012
Send Romney to Prison wrote:
<quoted text>I didn't realize Cometland and Big White Daddy are one and the same mmmmm .....either way, you elect the Mutt and he cuts my social security you all will have hell to pay. Since I no longer pay income tax I could give a crap if he raises your taxes to 50% and cuts his and his rich buddies to 5%. But....if he cuts my social security to make up the difference.....HELL will see lots of new arrivals. And I still think he should go to prison for stealing from all of us by hiding all his assests out of the country. If thats the kind of patriot you rich aszholes want to ruin your country then f***ing vote for him.
You seem to be unable to answer questions. Who has ever proposed a cut in Social Security? Seems like you are stuck on the notion that this is part of some platform.

Mitt has proposed tax cuts across the board, all brackets. Where you get some of your wild ideas, I'll never know.
Send Mutt to Prison

Columbia, MO

#25 Sep 21, 2012
Mutt drinks the same fanatsy koolaid you drink. You are going to get the govenrnment the Kochs paid for when you elect him.

If they do across the board tax cuts where will the money come from to run the government? You want questions answered , then answer that one yourself.

Why do billionaires spend millions or billions of dollars to get Mutt elected? Answer that one.
cometland

United States

#26 Sep 21, 2012
Send Mutt to Prison wrote:
Mutt drinks the same fanatsy koolaid you drink. You are going to get the govenrnment the Kochs paid for when you elect him.

If they do across the board tax cuts where will the money come from to run the government? You want questions answered , then answer that one yourself.

Why do billionaires spend millions or billions of dollars to get Mutt elected? Answer that one.
Easy answer. They spend that money to hopefully gain some sort of edge. Same reason big Democrat donors donate. You seem to be under the impression that when rich people donate to leftist causes it is out of a sense of patriotism. Both sides have big donors that expect to be paid back in some fashion. You don't like it, and I don't like it. It is, however, an even game.

As to your first point, you assume that any tax cut must somehow be paid for out of social security. Is it possible that tax cuts can be "paid for" out of corresponding cuts in spending? Those evil Bush tax cuts that put more money in the pockets of 98% of Americans didn't seem to diminish your social security check. You do know, don't you, that there is no Social Security trust fund? No account marked "Social Security". It's a Ponzi scheme paid for out of general revenue. You are the world's biggest fool if you think a politician on either side is going to take away "your" money. It would be political suicide.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 4
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Springfield Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
The Springfield Three 1992 (Sep '13) 39 min lncredible 16,573
Springfield National Socialist Movement (Feb '14) 1 hr marrio 4
Three missing women at Cox South (Oct '06) 2 hr lncredible 9,272
tired of this Mo state it sucks (springfield) (Jan '13) 3 hr lncredible 23
Springfield doesn't have a ghetto or dangerous ... (May '12) 4 hr lncredible 92
melissa ann alexander the snitch every methy sh... 4 hr lncredible 8
Back Page Hoezzzz 4 hr lncredible 3
More from around the web

Springfield People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]