Is that the new way that liberals determine lies, whether it was related to the military or not?<quoted text>
Yes, blah blah blah corporate sponsored Tea Bagger propganda newsletter of the week. We've all heard it before. But answer the question. What did we accomplish in Iraq? Also, how many American soldiers died because Obama "lied". Now how about GW Bush? Spin, Ghostrider, spin!
See, in the old days, a lie was a lie no matter what it was about.
Also, in order to prove a person lied, you first had to prove that the person knew the truth in the first place and stated otherwise. "I promise if you like your healthcare coverage, you will keep your healthcare coverage."
Now see, that was a lie. How do we know? Because we proved it was a lie by showing the National Registry where DumBama's very own administration said they knew most people would lose their healthcare plan. Want to try another one?
"I did not have sex...... with that woman....... Ms Lewinski." That too was a lie. How do we know? We have DNA evidence to prove he had sex with Mz Lewinski.
Now that we know what a lie is and what is needed to call one a liar, I have to ask, what did GW lie about?