I wonder how you'll spin it when Anderson rarely votes with the pizza guys? It's so cute how you make it sound like he was your candidate all along. Malone and Stuckey sought him out. The MSA side fully expects Anderson to be his own man (and wants that), but you will find that he will rarely support Petroni and Rigano because overall, Anderson does not approve of their methods and policies.(He said this publicly!) What will you say then? You claim that he will be a great board member because of his business savvy. Will you continue to say that after he consistently votes against Petroni and Rigano? Or will you make up lies about him and begin speaking out against him? Oh, I can't wait for you to see that Anderson thinks Petroni and Rigano are clowns like the rest if us do!<quoted text>
Did you know the election is over; the people came out to vote for REDUCED renewal levy;
and Educate Springboro's endorsement of Charles Anderson as the third candidate, because he was a private sector business man in the community; whose common sense
business expertise could join our current board members of common sense business expertise; thus forming a 3 member majority over our 2 retired educators who are deeply embedded in failed practices of the past -- making up false budget crisis and then withholding services from our students IF the people don't pass a school levy.
That's the old way of doing things; but voters are optimistic that Malone and Stuckey
have the ability to LEARN from our current board members, David Petroni and Jim Rigano.
If Malone and Stuckey remain reluctant, then it will be transparent to our entire community that Malone and Stuckey are not FIT to serve our school children and community; and
they will be petitioned to step down from service IF they stubbornly REFUSE to
STAND UP FOR KIDS!
By the way, MSA doesn't need to learn anything from the pizza guys - it is Petroni and Rigano who will be schooled, and we can't wait!