There are 31893 comments on the Dayton Daily News story from Feb 5, 2008, titled Our recommendation: Springboro voters should say 'yes' the first time to school levies. In it, Dayton Daily News reports that:
Recommended local sites More... UD sports info, pictures and discussions Are you a UD sports fan? Whether you like basketball, volleyball, soccer, men's or women's teams -- Doesn't matter -- this site is for ... via Dayton Daily News
Join the discussion below, or Read more at Dayton Daily News.
#27625 Sep 30, 2013
This morning I noticed some great looking signs asking a simple question. I wonder how the community will answer this question.
#27626 Sep 30, 2013
Geez, I don't know Doug - how will the community respond?! Well, one, the signs were picked up b/c they were illegally placed (NOT to mention a lie - get your facts straight!) and two, the community will respond by voting for the ticket of Malone/Stuckey/Anderson - the ticket that has ethics, leadership, trust and honor! Get a life Doug!
#27627 Sep 30, 2013
Sorry to burst your bubble, but I am NOT Doug Weideman.
Do you care to elaborate on what you perceive to be a lie in regards to these great signs?
#27628 Sep 30, 2013
yea, let's go back to the OLD way, it was so much better when Baker and crew were threatening us taxpayers for more new money, emotionally blackmailing & bullying parents into voting for a levy by threatening to cut services, raise pay to participate fees, as well as a host of other onerous threats.
Proficient = Failure!
#27629 Sep 30, 2013
Yea, and while you're at it, Gladys Kravitz, how do you know the signs were picked up b/c they were illegally placed?
#27630 Sep 30, 2013
Doesn't this sound like more Maney/Malone tunnel vision praise and worship of the union family insiders, while the union school board candidates are ignoring their responsibility to answer the questions of outsiders who, by the way, foot the big bill for the union insiders generous pay increases and great compensation/benefits packages?
#27631 Sep 30, 2013
We need more than ethics, leadership, trust, and honor that Malone,Stuckey,Anderson possess; We need school board candidates elected who are already "on board" with our current board's new reform minded philosophy of fixing budgets/levy alternatives to ensure a quality 21st century education for all students, while living within the framework of our children's first budget.
Hasn't Mr. Malone already announced publicly to the taxpaying voters that he is not a good "fit" with our school district philosophy....?
In the May 2013 issue of Springboro Life magazine, editor Jill Kelley conducted a two page interview with Ron Malone, who has been a SHS principal for the PAST 13 years. During the interview, the retiring principal relfected on his PAST 41 years as professional educator, stating that the district is going through a lot of internal changes and changes at the state level. Mr. Malone states in the Springboro Life magazine interview:
"I've always felt that the key to a person's effectiveness is how they fit within an organizational philosophy. This changes over time. I'm not sure the fit is as good now as when I came to Springboro in 2000. My strengths and the board's expectations of my position do not match as well as I would like."
People in this community should ask ourselves:
... if Mr. Malone conceded in May 2013, that his strengths in educational expertise of the past 41 years, does not fit with the current board-approved agenda of a quality 21st century classroom education, while living within the framework of our new philosophy of Children's First budgeting...
...why is he working against our Students First best educational interests, by campaigning
for BOE election to gain "control of the board" to re-instate his Adults First status quo philosophy, stating "There needs to be a re-emphasis on the value of the educator?"
#27632 Sep 30, 2013
Balance can be seen on scales, in sports and on spreadsheets. There are times when balance is easy to see and define. There are times when we have to work to achieve balance. For example, in our own homes we try to find a perfect balance between work and family. Although we can define the ideal, we rarely meet it.
With the Board of Education race in Springboro this fall, voters will look for balance. Some will argue balance means putting opposing sides together on the board. But the picture of balance needs to be bigger than that. Board of Education members are elected to represent the community in the school district.
The board is elected to balance the interests of students, parents, taxpayers, and employees. Many school boards lack balance because they are comprised of people with more allegiance to maintaining a specific establishment than to the greater cause.
In Springboro, balance has been restored. With a new administrative team, the Springboro school district has adopted a mission to “accelerate student achievement and support qualified staff with a balanced budget.” These are not empty words: they summarize actions. Together, we have achieved a balanced budget. We are on the right course, but it has not been easy.
With Educate Springboro, we brought changes that forced many to rethink long-held beliefs. Anytime the status quo changes, there is resistance. Panicked petitions and hysterical headlines have made things “feel” out of balance. So now, there is a slate of three candidates that want to return to the past – which “felt” balanced.
However, today we can see just how far out of balance we actually were under the previous leadership. Some of the imbalances of the past include:
-Capping high school class sizes in the 20s, while other grades who most need teacher attention, had larger class sizes (often up to 30).
-Teaching the majority to meet the proficient standard (proficient is a OAA test score in 8th grade >40), while our district receives a “D” in gifted education and a “C” for our more challenged, lowest 20%.
-Ignoring the changing curriculum and testing standards for students.
-Charging higher pay-to-play and school fees than were necessary.
-Failing to plan for technology in our classrooms and then spending resources on wireless technology that was inadequate and required replacement.
-Ignoring recommendations to improve the rigor of our high school academic programs by failing to promote college credit options for our students.
-Reacting to circumstances and spending more than budgeted instead of planning to invest and keeping up our buildings, grounds and bus fleet.
-Assuming the only solution was higher taxes and hoping for a new levy to pass.
These are symptoms of the status quo controlling a school district that lost its balance.
#27633 Sep 30, 2013
(cont. p.2 )
If there was any balance at all in the past, it was an eye for an eye. As this community said “no” to five new money levies, district leaders failed to find levy alternatives. The status quo threatened the community with cuts. Thankfully, many of those leaders have left, but some now would like to return to sit on our school board.
This year’s record is easy to defend because it consistently demonstrates investing in Children First. From replacing the District’s aging computers, buses, to implementing new curriculum and raising expectations with new standards, testing – we have progressed!
Why would we give control back to those who slowed this district’s progress? Those who inflated budget forecasts? Those who ignored the capital needs of the District? Most importantly, why would we elect the same people who neglected to put Children First in our schools?
The Children First budget is navigating us away from the repeated failures of the past. Now, working in open, public meetings, asking tough questions, hearing all voices, using performance data and striving to find a balance that supports teachers, our community is achieving the goal to put Children First in every decision.
Balance is about consistent, sustainable, forward-looking leadership. Educate Springboro sees the bigger picture and leads in the direction of balance for our children, schools and community. We’ll continue to be the voice that stands up for parents and the community, examining past practices, and making tough decisions – whether it is providing technology, more services for gifted students, raises for employees, or even a tax rollback – To maintain balance for the benefit of everyone.
#27634 Sep 30, 2013
The signs were not illegally placed.
The question is a rather salient one:
How will a UNION CONTROLLED school board spend your TAX DOLLARS?
I suppose some folks would rather not have others exposed to such thinking, but what exactly was inaccurate about that sign?
Presiding over 12 years of looting of over $1,000,000 of the booster money while head of the high school and then fighting against necessary reforms to combat this sort of behavior in the future certainly is not many people's way of gaining trust or honor. Maybe in Mr. Malone's tiny part of the world that makes sense, but I doubt it works elsewhere.
Knowingly dumbing down the curriculum of the high school in the face of NO RESEARCH OR DATA that supports that course of action as beneficial to the students is not demonstrating either leadership nor ethics. When will Mr. Malone explain to us how not providing a more challenging educational atmosphere was good for our children and their future?
#27635 Sep 30, 2013
If the signs were not placed illegally, as Be A Man alleges, where did they go?
I'd check with the twp and city if they took them down. If they did they will give them back and give you the reason as to why.
But if they didn't take them, then maybe an IP address search for Be A Man would be prudent. Then the authorities could inquire how the poster knew before noon today that the signs, plural, were taken down...because they were "illegally placed"
FWIW, the city and twp will only take down signs IF they have a complaint AND if they are placed illegally. Or if they are in the right of way causing a sight problem.
Sounds to me you got someones attention and they took it upon themselves to illegally take down campaign signs.
#27636 Sep 30, 2013
I am a conservative in Springboro and find the signs offensive. Are you saying unions are bad? Are you saying my police and fire fighters are bad because they belong to the union? No I am not in a union and have never been in one.
I think people need to think before speaking or putting up signs. I will vote for anyone who does not support that rhetoric.
#27637 Sep 30, 2013
Belonging to a union does not mean that teachers and police and fire fighters are bad. It is bad that our CCFD assistant fire chief (who is a union member) chose to behave "badly" recently on this Topix blog by "stealing" an elected official's identity to post an untrue statement. It is bad that this same CCFD assistant fire chief is also a member of our Springboro Schools safety sub committee (and obviously someone in which our entire community
trusted to never behave badly). I do think it is bad when party loyalty to unionism is so empowering to union members that good judgement is lost, and the people's best interest is not served.
The OEA members are some of the worst people we have ever had to deal with as to radical social behavior. They have the destruction of America in their minds and they are terrible people because their ideology makes them corrosive. They openly use children to execute their maniacal plans for social progressive changes at the expense of society, and this defines their essence. Wars are won by taking away from the other side the will to continue fighting. The OEA directly attacks good citizens with wicked words of war (psychological warfare) hoping to rob them of their will to stand opposed to the union's progressive agenda;
because to the OEA radicals, they ARE at war with taxpayers.
Our schools and community need leaders who will attack out of control labor costs and unnecessary government spending; and protect taxpayers hard earned tax dollars while keeping our
future stable and debt-free for our children and grandchildren.
#27638 Sep 30, 2013
The signs ask a simple question:
How will a UNION CONTROLLED school board spend your TAX DOLLARS ?
Pray tell what is offensive about that question?
Judging from your inferences I would say bad thoughts immediately crept into your mind, but my sign did not put those prejudices in your subconscious. Those were formed by your own life experiences and learning.
#27639 Sep 30, 2013
From the blog of David Bowman in support of his candidates, Mr. Malone and Mr. Stuckey
"Read up, review the facts, and be prepared to counter the distortions and lies that are surely headed to your inbox, your mailbox, and even in the little rock filled plastic baggies containing misleading propaganda that will surely be hitting your front lawn in the days ahead. "
Let us ask Mr Bowman, Mr Malone, or Mr. Stuckey how they counter facts gleaned from the Ohio Department of Education regarding our students performance on the Ohio Achievement Assessment tests.
Class of 2018
7th Grade 2012-2013
Ohio Achievement Assessment Tests Results.
Math .......50 possible points on the test
State Rating System and distribution of students for the 7th grade
Limited.......... 14 Students
Limited.......... 18% was the Average score for this group
Limited..........definition--0 -10 correct answers =(0-20% correct)
Basic ..........28% was the Average score for this group
Basic..........definition--11 - 16 correct answers =(22-32% correct)
Proficient........46% was the Average score for this group
Proficient.......definition--1 7-28 correct answers =(34-56% correct)
Accelerated.....64% was the Average score for this group
Accelerated.....definition--29 -35 correct answers =(58-70% correct)
Advanced........80% was the Average score for this group
Advanced........definition--36 -50 correct answers =(72-100% correct)
Applying Mr. Malone's same grading system used for assigning percentages to grades earned in the college credit program (PSEO)
F.....Below 62.99% correct answers.......282 Students
Percentage of Students.....56% receiving F
D..... 63%- 74.99% correct answers......108 Students
Percentage of Students.....21% receiving D
C......75%- 84.99% correct answers........77 Students
Percentage of Students.....16% receiving C
B..... 85%- 92.99% correct answers........34 Students
Percentage of Students.....7% receiving B
A..... 93% correct answers and above.....1 Students
Percentage of Students....0% receiving A
A more honest assessment of the children's level of knowledge reveals that we have:
PASSING 75% or better - 23%
FAILING 74% or lower - 77%
Ask Mr. Bowman which part of the above is a distortion, a lie, or propaganda?
#27640 Oct 1, 2013
LOL, your a conservative? Right.
It's called freedom of speech. Deal with it.
#27642 Oct 1, 2013
I'd like Mr Bowman, instead of worrying about negatives, to actually read up, review the facts, and give us a couple of objective reasons to vote for his candidates.
I mean what are they running on? What is it that they want to do to objectively better the district and the kids...other than "take back their board"
Last election cycle the cry from the nattering neybobs was Petroni and Rigano had no kids in the system. That they had conflicts of interest among other silly non issues.
This election cycle the same people are supporting 3 men that have no kids in they system and definite agendas with conflicts of interest. Yet Bowman says to review the facts and read up in order to support his candidates. From what I have read is Malone and Stuckey are entrenched in the SEA. Malones wife and daughter are SEA dues paying members. Elect the MSA ticket and we will have 5 men on the BOA and not a one of them with kids in the system. Is that what Mr Bowman really wants?
Please, someone tell me,What are they running on? Hey Mr Bowman, don't tell me why not to vote for someone else, tell me why I should vote for the people you support. Cuz for whatever reason, no else can tell me why I should vote for them...I just hear more reasons not to vote for them. What are the "distortions, lies and propaganda" that you believe youll find coming your way?
Bittner and Vaughn...Kids in the system, no agendas, no conflicts of interest. Working for our kids and their kids.
#27643 Oct 1, 2013
Bitner and Vaughn...Kids in the system, no agendas, no conflicts of interest. Working for our kids and their kids.
#27644 Oct 1, 2013
Thank you so much for what you're doing. There is absolutely nothing inaccurate about the wording you selected for the signage. If you will, place more of this signage in right-of-ways at the entrances of Brookside, and I'll see that it's videomonitored in order to help deter vandalism or theft.
#27645 Oct 1, 2013
Who is running against Anderson, Stuckey, and Malone? Whoever they are, they have my vote!:-)
Add your comments below
|The 25 Most Dangerous Cities in the U.S. Are Mo... (Nov '10)||5 hr||Buck Rohde||20,185|
|Vote for issue 13||10 hr||Reluctant Republican||6|
|I Came to Save Dayton Topix!||Sun||The Duke of Hazard||11|
|Notice how Dennis ran...||Oct 10||just observing||3|
|We got Leon Harrison BANNED from Facebook (Sep '14)||Oct 9||Fan of Leon The Man||13|
|"Make this the final Columbus Day!"||Oct 7||Leon Harrison||1|
Find what you want!
Search Springboro Forum Now
Copyright © 2015 Topix LLC