And you wonder why others are toying with you by not bringing up alternative candidates. You can't support your candidates with objective reasons to vote FOR them. So you want to change the discussion by tearing down other candidates. Yes you are the transparent. If you remember Petroni and Rigano ran on a very specific platform of objectinve items they wanted and proved to be able to do. They actually did their homework, and it shows today witht the succes they have had in our district. SAM doesn't seem to actaully stand for anything other than to "take back our board". You certainly have not given any real reason to vote for them. In fact, by your own words you have given me pause to serioulsy look at other candidates...ones with children in the district, ones that have never sued the district as a sittring teacher, ones that do not have huge conficts of interest by serving family over the kids and the interests of the community.<quoted text>
...This board is all about tearing down what is known (MSA) and never bringing up what isn't known (better alternative candidates).
But I digress. Lets look at some of your other recent "homework" and contradicting posts:
You do know, from all your homework, that Stuckey has previuosly sued the district? And not this BOE. He lost, of course, but is that what you want from a teacher and BOE member? A person that has put his self interest ahead of the kids, district and coummunity to sue because he didn't get a coaching job he wanted?<quoted text>...I also have a hard time with a board that...are putting our "hard earned tax dollars" at risk, being spend on court cases we (like most others) will loose(sic).
You keep giving me more and more reasons not to support these people. lol.
For my own edification; Can you name a single court case "like most others" that this BOE has lost?