If they don't stand for anything they cannot be criticized for anything other than being meretricious.<quoted text>
Go read Bowman's latest blog post located here: http://www.davidebowman.com/how-our-founding-...
What's interesting to note about his posts is that all he does is tell us why we should NOT vvote for the current board and completely avoids telling us why we SHOULD vote for Malone, Stuckey and Anderson. Not even the web site for those three has any information on the issues and/or their stances. Are we to vote for them based on popularity? Seems that is what they are relying on. That and the usual scorched earth, sky is falling scare tactics that we have been witness to in the last few years.
Can someone articulate their stances? If they want my vote it would be nice to know exactly what they intend to do. Simply stating "we are for the children" is not sufficient.
Not much of a platform, but for some that is all that is required.