I do not agree with what you have to say, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it.<quoted text>
No reason, no reason at all to elect a person that will allow and encourage their tea party friends to make extremely insensitive, racially charged remarks as they wave a confederate flag in our school board meeting, once again putting Springboro in the headlines and making a mockery of our district:
That sentiment and the First Amendment to the United States Constitution sum up the fallacy of your position.
The First Amendment (Amendment I) to the United States Constitution prohibits the making of any law respecting an establishment of religion, impeding the free exercise of religion, abridging the freedom of speech, infringing on the freedom of the press, interfering with the right to peaceably assemble or prohibiting the petitioning for a governmental redress of grievances. It was adopted on December 15, 1791, as one of the ten amendments that comprise the Bill of Rights.
That pretty much sums up a local school board meeting.
While you and your ilk may be for censorship of thought for adults, I stand firmly in the camp that allows ideas to rise and fall on their own accord.