Okay, all of you liberal privacy lovers...
Posted in the Springboro Forum
#1 Apr 29, 2014
Okay, all of you offended sensitive outraged liberal privacy lovers and others: V. Stiviano, identified far and wide as the girlfriend of Donald Sterling, the married 80-year-old owner of the California Clippers, maintains that she did not personally leak the damning [telephone-recording] tapes to TMZ, but she definitely made them up to 100 hours' worth, according to some sources and just so happens to be getting sued by Sterling's wife at the moment.
California Wiretapping Law:
California's wiretapping law is a "two-party consent" law. California makes it a crime to record or eavesdrop on any confidential communication, including a private conversation or telephone call, without the consent of all parties to the conversation. See Cal. Penal Code § 632. The statute applies to "confidential communications" -- i.e., conversations in which one of the parties has an objectively reasonable expectation that no one is listening in or overhearing the conversation. See Flanagan v. Flanagan, 41 P.3d 575, 576-77, 578-82 (Cal. 2002). A California appellate court has ruled that this statute applies to the use of hidden video cameras to record conversations as well. See California v. Gibbons, 215 Cal. App. 3d 1204 (Cal Ct. App. 1989).
If you are recording someone without their knowledge in a public or semi-public place like a street or restaurant, the person whom you're recording may or may not have "an objectively reasonable expectation that no one is listening in or overhearing the conversation," and the reasonableness of the expectation would depend on the particular factual circumstances. Therefore, you cannot necessarily assume that you are in the clear simply because you are in a public place.
If you are operating in California, you should always get the consent of all parties before recording any conversation that common sense tells you might be "private" or "confidential." In addition to subjecting you to criminal prosecution, violating the California wiretapping law can expose you to a civil lawsuit for damages by an injured party. See Cal. Penal Code § 637.2
#2 Apr 29, 2014
That is: Los Angeles Clippers
#3 Apr 29, 2014
Another thing that makes me pissed: Media people should know about this, recording conversations and phone calls, before or after college, without the recorded party's consent or knowledge.
Mel Gibson's little Russian whore egged him on and pissed him off, to record his angry telephone call, after she did not love him no more.
Kim Bassinger recorded Alec Baldwin's angry [abusive?] phone call to their daughter, during which he yelled at the spoiled little bitch.
#4 Apr 29, 2014
So...offended sensitive race and victim pimps who whine about our thought or dislike or hate crimes can punish us and levy fines? Oh, this is nice and fair and does not make you a little scared? You won't boohoo if and after you are fined or sued? Not that this could or would ever apply to me or to you. I guess that we should pay bribes to the right members of the right oppressed neglected rejected victimized tribes.
Add your comments below
|happy birthday to Dana Sue Franklin's number 1...||10 hr||Wendys crew||3|
|Goodpussy (Mar '15)||13 hr||dana||18|
|looking for a rich man||14 hr||dana||3|
|Indiana Governor Mike Dunce for veep?||17 hr||Ivanka||7|
|Stop tina turley or christina turley||Fri||Toughstuff||5|
|Save Mother Earth!||Fri||John Kerry||9|
|Our recommendation: Springboro voters should sa... (Feb '08)||Jul 28||Pay your taxes||31,934|
Find what you want!
Search Springboro Forum Now
Copyright © 2016 Topix LLC