Anything is better than what ENDA has been molested into: protecting the religious to discriminate (as long as they 'donate' to the DNC).
Know how that works?
Every piece of legislation benefits future-generations of college-grads; raises fees, fines, penalties, taxes, to fund college-grads careers at taxpayer expense, mostly pro-unionized,'donating' to the DNC portion of the Legislative Branch to "get more" and more -- and more -- more -- more ...
--'success' when it comes to hospitals and prisons, for example, is "full beds and build more."
--'success' in terms of real Healthcare and Justice (to everybody else) is "all beds EMPTY."
-- and all the suppliers, maintenance, corrections officers and staff in both prisons and hospitals are unionized 'grunts', who gave-up their free-speech rights to negotiate anything; their voice rendered 'meaningless' so future generations of college-grads at taxpayer expense have "job-security" and retire 'phaaat', directing all 'donations' to Legislative Branches for more, more, more --
-- the real definition of OBESITY when it comes to economics; the ultimate GLUTTONY SYSTEM, designed by, and 'defended' by PhDs who nobody can dispute, who write all the rules, all the regs, all the policies, and now, you can't even work for gov't without some form of 'degree/credential' approved by them.
-- is that not in itself a violation of the 14th Amendment? I think so. I really do.
-- interesting how the real work, not paperFAKEwork, but the real work, is off the backs of everybody else, while Fake Majesty evolves.
I was fired for being Gay Married, fired by the Str8-married because I was Gay Married; my same-sex spouse was fired for being Gay Married to me; and now Obama's so-called 'equal protections' is protecting the religiously inclined to discriminate against me. Why not exempt the religious from slavery laws? Allow them to fire women? Or Jews? Or POCs? or Disableds?
What's the difference?
Now, we've got pro-unions putting Lesbians in office, claiming they are 'gay'-- like Tammy Baldwin -- who doesn't even know who/what she is -- how can she possibly 'protect' the rights, let alone know the needs of we Gays?
Know how that works? Before Gay Rights, before Civil Rights, a man suggested 'gay' as a substitute for the word 'homosexual' because of the meanness that word is spit. When we got to court, we had to define who and what we are. Now, The DNC's "darling Lesbian" is claiming she is what a 'gay' is.
I'm just Gay, I'm not a Lesbian. Simple. I'm a male, not a female. Simple. That's what Gay Rights is. We paid with our blood to define it.
Now, we're being dragged into court repeatedly, for decades, to prevent clandestine religious "healings/cures/treatment programs" which have evolved into subsidized "treatments", forced-treatments to 'cure' us of our 'gayness'.
It's not an 'attitude adjustment.' You can't take a pill or get 'counseling' or 'prayer' and 'make it go away.' With DNC's Lesbian 'darling' claiming she is 'gay,' she will now be subpoena'd to 'testify' that she is 'gay'-- CASE CLOSED and forced treatments will resume.
-- that's what Hitler did.