Letter: Second Amendment is too often misinterpreted

There are 3 comments on the Rochester Democrat and Chronicle story from Jan 22, 2013, titled Letter: Second Amendment is too often misinterpreted. In it, Rochester Democrat and Chronicle reports that:

Oh, and by the way, gun advocates think the intent of this amendment is so the gun owner can shoot at federal officials intent on taking away their guns.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Rochester Democrat and Chronicle.

Grady Stiles

United States

#1 Jan 22, 2013
From the D&C (Grace Knaak): "How the Second Amendment to the Constitution is written:“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”

How it is interpreted by avid gun rights proponents: Congress shall make no law abridging any individual’s right to own any gun(s) without limits as to how many or their potential for destruction.

Oh, and by the way, gun advocates think the intent of this amendment is so the gun owner can shoot at federal officials intent on taking away their guns. Really?"
GRACE KNAAK
ROCHESTER

Really, Grace? The second amendment DOES say that governemnt officals CANNOT take away those guns (that's what the words "shall not be infringed" mean). Looks like you haven't bothered learning how to read over the past 72 years. Well, no sense learning now, as you can't teach an old dog new tricks.

Since: Mar 11

Location hidden

#2 Jan 22, 2013
Grady Stiles wrote:
From the D&C (Grace Knaak): "How the Second Amendment to the Constitution is written:“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”
How it is interpreted by avid gun rights proponents: Congress shall make no law abridging any individual’s right to own any gun(s) without limits as to how many or their potential for destruction.
Oh, and by the way, gun advocates think the intent of this amendment is so the gun owner can shoot at federal officials intent on taking away their guns. Really?"
GRACE KNAAK
ROCHESTER
Really, Grace? The second amendment DOES say that governemnt officals CANNOT take away those guns (that's what the words "shall not be infringed" mean). Looks like you haven't bothered learning how to read over the past 72 years. Well, no sense learning now, as you can't teach an old dog new tricks.
Would you want to bet that Ms.Knaak is a diehard dem and voted for Obama? This is how the left try to brainwash the masses,one little bit at the time.
Grady Stiles

United States

#3 Jan 22, 2013
pigpen911 wrote:
<quoted text>Would you want to bet that Ms.Knaak is a diehard dem and voted for Obama? This is how the left try to brainwash the masses,one little bit at the time.
I think these liberal tree huggers / Emily Good types need to spend a night listening to the Jungle Scanner and then reconsider how they feel about sitting home unarmed. Wow Google says she lives in Greece too.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Spencerport Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Walmart Lego Theft Triggers High-Speed Chase 31 min SouthWedgeCousin 1
Brother wease el 2 hr Slamner 6
News Man Faces Assault Charges Following Stabbing 4 hr the wedge 2
News Two Decades Later, Wayne County Family Continue... 6 hr SouthWedgeCousin 1
Messages to Bob Lonsberry (phase 2) (Mar '12) 13 hr Yams 393
Local Police Officer Honored Rescuing Child 17 hr Yata 2
Punishers MC (Oct '12) 19 hr Rocco 101
More from around the web

Spencerport People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]