Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 Read more: www.cnn.com 201,862

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Read more
Skippy

Monrovia, CA

#174254 Jan 11, 2013
Skippy says: get out of towners are just pests.
Big D

Modesto, CA

#174255 Jan 11, 2013
heartandmind wrote:
<quoted text>
the more important question is : why are you here, in a thread regarding same sex marriage?
another question :
why don't you start a movement on your own to get polygamy legalized? go ahead - hire an attorney and take it to court. we'll read all about it in the news. i look forward to reading about the arguments presented in court. good luck.
Because he doesn’t actually care at all about the subject, he is only trying to get attention, specifically a reaction from people.

look how many time he asks if someone is mad

that is the goal, talking about one small sad human here
Mikey DiRucci

Union City, CA

#174256 Jan 11, 2013
Looks like the judge-it fairy is very busy this morning rigging the judge-its! Priceless!
Jane Dodo

Hoboken, NJ

#174257 Jan 11, 2013
Mikey DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
You mean like man does not equal woman?
No. I mean like three does not equal two.
Jane Dodo

Hoboken, NJ

#174258 Jan 11, 2013
heartandmind wrote:
<quoted text>
the more important question is : why are you here, in a thread regarding same sex marriage?
another question :
why don't you start a movement on your own to get polygamy legalized? go ahead - hire an attorney and take it to court. we'll read all about it in the news. i look forward to reading about the arguments presented in court. good luck.
Because he's not really interested in polygamy. He's interested in whining.
Mikey DiRucci

Union City, CA

#174259 Jan 11, 2013
heartandmind wrote:
<quoted text>
the more important question is : why are you here, in a thread regarding same sex marriage?
another question :
why don't you start a movement on your own to get polygamy legalized? go ahead - hire an attorney and take it to court. we'll read all about it in the news. i look forward to reading about the arguments presented in court. good luck.
Naah. The more important question is why are you against some alternate forms of marriage while at the same time promoting your own alternate form of marriage?

Put more simply, why are you a hypocrite?

I'm trying to have an intelligent discussion of marriage equality, I wish you would participate instead of attempting to censor me.
Mikey DiRucci

Union City, CA

#174260 Jan 11, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
Because he doesn’t actually care at all about the subject, he is only trying to get attention, specifically a reaction from people.
look how many time he asks if someone is mad
that is the goal, talking about one small sad human here
Mikey DiRucci

Union City, CA

#174261 Jan 11, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
Because he doesn’t actually care at all about the subject, he is only trying to get attention, specifically a reaction from people.
look how many time he asks if someone is mad
that is the goal, talking about one small sad human here
This is a discussion forum. It doesn't work if you refuse to discuss the topic and get all angry and have hissy fits. Relax.

Polygamy is marriage, completely on topic in a discussion of marriage equality.

By your rules you cannot mention Mars in a discussion of Venus. Your rules are stupid. And the purpose of them is to censor unwelcome thought. Anti-intellectual and boring.

What a jerk!
Mikey DiRucci

Union City, CA

#174262 Jan 11, 2013
Jane Dodo wrote:
<quoted text>No. I mean like three does not equal two.
I find it difficult to see the logic of defending monogamous marriage as the historic norm when the laws of many states have already departed from the principle that it is heterosexual, monogamous marriage that is essential to social stability.

Put bluntly, if heterosexuality is no longer legally, morally or socially relevant to marriage, why should monogamy continue to be so important?

If you're going to respond "Polygamy is a red herring!! And you think a red herring is a fish!!" again, don't bother. you already tried that. it failed.

Why are you a hypocrite?
Jane Dodo

Hoboken, NJ

#174263 Jan 11, 2013
Mikey DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
Naah. The more important question is why are you against some alternate forms of marriage while at the same time promoting your own alternate form of marriage?
Put more simply, why are you a hypocrite?
I'm trying to have an intelligent discussion of marriage equality, I wish you would participate instead of attempting to censor me.
This thread is about Prop 8. What does Prop 8 have to do with polygamy?
Mikey DiRucci

Union City, CA

#174264 Jan 11, 2013
Jane Dodo wrote:
<quoted text>Because he's not really interested in polygamy. He's interested in whining.
I am interested in discussing marriage. This is a discussion forum. It won't work if you treat it like a kindergarten playground and refuse to discuss the topic to hide your bigotry. Tell me why you are against polyamory, don't just whine.

So, before I was so juvenilely interrupted, I was asking you why are you a hypocrite?
Jane Dodo

Hoboken, NJ

#174265 Jan 11, 2013
Mikey DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
I find it difficult to see the logic of defending monogamous marriage as the historic norm when the laws of many states have already departed from the principle that it is heterosexual, monogamous marriage that is essential to social stability.
Put bluntly, if heterosexuality is no longer legally, morally or socially relevant to marriage, why should monogamy continue to be so important?
If you're going to respond "Polygamy is a red herring!! And you think a red herring is a fish!!" again, don't bother. you already tried that. it failed.
Why are you a hypocrite?
That lame-ass excuse again?...yawn... It was laughable the first time you posted it, now it's just boring.
Jane Dodo

Hoboken, NJ

#174266 Jan 11, 2013
Mikey DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
This is a discussion forum. It doesn't work if you refuse to discuss the topic and get all angry and have hissy fits. Relax.
Um.... the topic is Prop 8.
Jane Dodo

Hoboken, NJ

#174267 Jan 11, 2013
Mikey DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
I am interested in discussing marriage. This is a discussion forum. It won't work if you treat it like a kindergarten playground and refuse to discuss the topic to hide your bigotry. Tell me why you are against polyamory, don't just whine.
So, before I was so juvenilely interrupted, I was asking you why are you a hypocrite?
Then start your own damn thread. This is about Prop 8. I can understand why you don't wish to discuss it.
Mikey DiRucci

Union City, CA

#174268 Jan 11, 2013
Jane Dodo wrote:
<quoted text>
This thread is about Prop 8. What does Prop 8 have to do with polygamy?
Marriage.
Bed O Winds

Monrovia, CA

#174269 Jan 11, 2013
Karzai hasn't the brains to listen to good advice, but rather wants to be friends tot he very thugs who want him buried. Money is the only thing these people want.

Presidnet Karzai can take his BULL back to Afghan where his loving country men will end up burying him in a pine box
Bed O Winds

Monrovia, CA

#174270 Jan 11, 2013
Karzai hasn't the brains to listen to good advice, but rather wants to be friends to the very thugs who want him buried. Money is the only thing these people want.

Presidnet Karzai can take his BULL back to Afghan where his loving country men will end up burying him in a pine box.

Theyt will revert back to laws thugs shootingone another over stupid little people issues.
Mikey DiRucci

Union City, CA

#174271 Jan 11, 2013
Jane Dodo wrote:
<quoted text>
That lame-ass excuse again?...yawn... It was laughable the first time you posted it, now it's just boring.
So don't read it again, just don't attempt to censor it because you cannot intelligently respond without revealing your hypocrisy.
Mikey DiRucci

Union City, CA

#174272 Jan 11, 2013
Jane Dodo wrote:
<quoted text>Then start your own damn thread. This is about Prop 8. I can understand why you don't wish to discuss it.
Why is that?

The defeat of Prop 8 is a victory for polygamy too.
Mikey DiRucci

Union City, CA

#174273 Jan 11, 2013
Jane Dodo wrote:
<quoted text>
Um.... the topic is Prop 8.
Limiting the number of husbands a woman has seems to me just as much an infringement as limiting the gender of whom that woman can marry.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

South San Francisco Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News The 25 Most Dangerous Cities in the U.S. Are Mo... (Nov '10) 26 min Booger Toast 19,840
News Gay marriage (Mar '13) 6 hr HaYsUsWasGay 59,252
News The Great California Train Shortage 8 hr OccupyThis 4
Hidden Gems of SF 15 hr palms25 1
News Court upholds $2.8-million award for woman mole... Sun hMMMMM 10
News New S.F. archive includes stunning photos from ... Apr 17 retire 1
Ingles Markets Inc Apr 16 Sophie 1
More from around the web

South San Francisco People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]