Rattlesnakes as pets ban may be lifte...

Rattlesnakes as pets ban may be lifted in state

There are 48 comments on the Fox13Now story from Feb 16, 2010, titled Rattlesnakes as pets ban may be lifted in state. In it, Fox13Now reports that:

The Division of Wildlife Resources is considering to lift a rule that will allow people to have rattlesnakes as pets.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Fox13Now.

First Prev
of 3
Next Last
Tom Miller

South Jordan, UT

#1 Feb 16, 2010
This is beyond stupid. Even for PITA people. The liberal folk have now gone beyond all common sense. I am for all rattle snakes living in the desert were they belong. Rattle snakes do have a purpose in nature out in the desert and in their natural habitat but they should not be allowed to be keept as pets. These repitals were never intended to be pets. It is an issue that is beyond insane for our govement officials to consider. I would like to know who are the goverment folks that are even considering this issue so that I can talk to their superiors and see that they can be replaced with more responsible people. Tom Miller
Snake Man Dave

Taylorsville, UT

#2 Feb 16, 2010
You'll want to revise your article. Rattlesnakes don't lay eggs. They are viviporous, meaning they give birth to live young. This makes them easier to breed because there are no eggs to incubate.
schlaufrau

Syracuse, UT

#3 Feb 17, 2010
Are you kidding me? What about the safety of rescue personel or innocent children in the home or unknowing visitors? This is the dumbest idea I've ever heard and I can't believe the Division of Wildlife Resources is even giving the proposal any serious consideration. Common sense is extinct!

“Accurately Observant”

Since: Dec 09

Location hidden

#4 Feb 17, 2010
wow they need to make a law like that in Arkansas.

hell I think you should be required to pass an IQ test before becoming a pet owner.
wabenaki

Salt Lake City, UT

#5 Feb 17, 2010
this is idiotic. i didn't realize that there was a huge movement of people in utah wanting to keep rattlesnakes. that people are keeping them already illegally is no reason. if people are using illegal drugs, should we make them legal?
planetjanetem

Hurricane, UT

#6 Feb 17, 2010
Making rattlesnake ownership legal will do nothing but make more rattlesnake fatalities. There was a death here in Southern Utah in 1987 from a so called professional rattlesnake handler. Stevie Kirkwood would have been 25 this year.
This bill cannot and should not pass.
Bryan Hughes

Phoenix, AZ

#7 Feb 17, 2010
"using as many as 25 eggs." ... are you kidding? Rattlesnakes don't even lay eggs ... this is from the Division of Wildlife Resources?
Bryan Hughes

Phoenix, AZ

#8 Feb 17, 2010
Tom Miller wrote:
This is beyond stupid. Even for PITA people. The liberal folk have now gone beyond all common sense. I am for all rattle snakes living in the desert were they belong. Rattle snakes do have a purpose in nature out in the desert and in their natural habitat but they should not be allowed to be keept as pets. These repitals were never intended to be pets. It is an issue that is beyond insane for our govement officials to consider. I would like to know who are the goverment folks that are even considering this issue so that I can talk to their superiors and see that they can be replaced with more responsible people. Tom Miller
Wait... what does that have to do with PETA or liberals? The only thing that's liberal here is your flexibility with how the English language is spelled.
Bryan Hughes

Phoenix, AZ

#9 Feb 17, 2010
loveless_cynic wrote:
wow they need to make a law like that in Arkansas.
hell I think you should be required to pass an IQ test before becoming a pet owner.
Can you find one article or instance, anywhere, even in states where this has been legal for years, where rescue personnel have been attacked by a well-kept venomous snake?

The requirements of previous experience and room security should be the issue of concern. The word "pet" is not good here, as people who keep rattlesnakes seldom see them this way. There are many people who have the experience, training, and resources to keep them perfectly safely.

On the other hand, idiots are everywhere, and they're already keeping them. A well enforced license system would be ideal, and would encourage safety and give the DWR very useful knowledge about who these people are, what they have, and whether or not they are a threat.

“Accurately Observant”

Since: Dec 09

Location hidden

#10 Feb 17, 2010
Bryan Hughes wrote:
<quoted text>
Can you find one article or instance, anywhere, even in states where this has been legal for years, where rescue personnel have been attacked by a well-kept venomous snake?
The requirements of previous experience and room security should be the issue of concern. The word "pet" is not good here, as people who keep rattlesnakes seldom see them this way. There are many people who have the experience, training, and resources to keep them perfectly safely.
On the other hand, idiots are everywhere, and they're already keeping them. A well enforced license system would be ideal, and would encourage safety and give the DWR very useful knowledge about who these people are, what they have, and whether or not they are a threat.
the point is, they're venomous and should be kept in the wild
Blow

Winnemucca, NV

#11 Feb 17, 2010
What. You think the morons of the state don't already keep them as pets?

Get over it.

First you pukes want to ban gay marriage, now rattlesnakes?
stevies story

Saint George, UT

#12 Feb 17, 2010
this is the sickest thing i've ever hear!!!let me remind you back in 1987 in laverkin utah,a 22 month old little girl was killed by a 6 1/2 great basin rattle snake in the hands of a so called handler,STEVIE LaREN KIRKWOOD!!she never had a chance!! i'm just sick with pain!!!!that was my baby girl,her voice will be heard,from myself and others that love and miss her dearly!!!her story should be heard to save someones life!!!pull up your old news clips and remember a beautiful little girl that died at the hands of someone that thought they knew what he was doing,it's a night mare i live with everyday!!! he was drunk showing off and trying to prove a point where it turned into a weapon chaseing little kids and myself and others!! that a lot of people around here will never forget. who is to say it won't happen again?what about your kids,family and friends?? STEVIE will be heard,jeri ann kirkwood
stevies story

Saint George, UT

#13 Feb 17, 2010
Blow wrote:
What. You think the morons of the state don't already keep them as pets?
Get over it.
First you pukes want to ban gay marriage, now rattlesnakes?
thankyou for your say in this retarded inbreed folks here in utah!!!thankyou from my home town winnemucca,thanks!! chuck flemings,sister jeri!!! you rock!!! more support e-mail me at [email protected] STEVIE'S VOICE WILL BE HEARD!!!
Kenneth Mincks

Cedar Rapids, IA

#14 Feb 18, 2010
I was born and raised in Utah and now live in Arizona and must say, I don't understand the negative attitude that some of you are showing. There are more people injured and killed by dogs or cats every year than are injured or killed by reptiles in general. I have kept reptiles for the last several years and as of last August I have began keeping venomous animals. I also have a 6 year old child and his welfare is always our highest priority with any pet we have. For those who enjoy it, it is a very rewarding experience and for those who do not enjoy it, you don't have to keep them.

From what the article states, there will be a state licenses required and you will have to have a secure room and a sturdy cage to contain these animals and city laws will have the ability to prevent the keeping of these animals within city limits.

“Accurately Observant”

Since: Dec 09

Location hidden

#15 Feb 18, 2010
Kenneth Mincks wrote:
I was born and raised in Utah and now live in Arizona and must say, I don't understand the negative attitude that some of you are showing. There are more people injured and killed by dogs or cats every year than are injured or killed by reptiles in general. I have kept reptiles for the last several years and as of last August I have began keeping venomous animals. I also have a 6 year old child and his welfare is always our highest priority with any pet we have. For those who enjoy it, it is a very rewarding experience and for those who do not enjoy it, you don't have to keep them.
From what the article states, there will be a state licenses required and you will have to have a secure room and a sturdy cage to contain these animals and city laws will have the ability to prevent the keeping of these animals within city limits.
Killed by cats, really?

Aside from that, your 'statistic' is probably somewhat accurate, only because these animals are kept in the wild, the woods, where most humans DONT to venture out to; therefore, there are not as many reported injuries or deaths.

I applaud you for being a responsible pet owner,
however ludicrous it is to have a snake around a 6 year old.

To each their own, though.
David

Saint George, UT

#16 Feb 18, 2010
How many cat killings are there a year? I mean really I don't think I have ever heard of anybody dying from a cat or kitten attack!?
DeEtta

Saint George, UT

#17 Feb 18, 2010
I had no idea that a cat could kill a human! I have never heard of anybody being attacked by there cat, but a Mountain Lion is the one that would kill you. So, just out of curriosity; does that mean that I have to watch out for my ferrets?
DeEtta

Saint George, UT

#18 Feb 18, 2010
Another thing pitbulls are being killed because they have a bad rap. by people when it is not the dog but the HOMOSAPIANS that are training them to KILL. They are CONTROLED. Should I be afraid to buy a bunny? I had a wolf and she was just fine, but a snake you cannot train to attack and not to attack people. A rattle snake is a weapon that should not be allowed as pets. Ya'll bring up really good points about why and why not to own them, but we are talking about a snake that is a danger to the handler and everyone around them. How many people do you hear about that have been attacked by their five foot python? Snakes are not pets, and they should be treated with the greatest respect!
NC resident

Fort Bragg, NC

#19 Feb 18, 2010
Adear friend in utah lost her daugther to a rattlesnake that was suppose to be in a controled envirorment .they are dangerous animals not pets
the blonde one

Saint George, UT

#20 Feb 18, 2010
to all americans!be afraid,be very afaid,there are attack puppy's and kitty's out there to kill you,stop the violence!do not adopt homeless pets! run and and get you a loving,cuddleing rattle snake,they would make great pets and gift for everyone that needs the love,that only a sweet little rattle snake could give,we're talking heaven!!! for all the dumb people out there!!get real,leave them in the wild!!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 3
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

South Salt Lake Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Who says Mormons aren't Christians? (Oct '11) 5 hr Lux6996 32,075
More Problems with the Book of Mormon 18 hr Nancy 35
Mitt Romney is a turd 19 hr Bull Durham 36
White men! Date a woman with bi-racial kids? (May '11) Thu Malcolm 85
News In a national first, LGBT advocates sue Utah sc... Thu StraightYOP 18
News Mormons: We are Christians, too (Apr '07) Wed Kathi 28,896
Utah sucks Dec 6 Lajeanna 3

South Salt Lake Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

South Salt Lake Mortgages