Who says Mormons aren't Christians?

Oct 12, 2011 Full story: CNN 31,993

Editor's note: Dean Obeidallah is an award-winning comedian who has appeared on TV shows such as Comedy Central's "Axis of Evil" special, ABC's "The View," CNN's "What the Week" and HLN's "The Joy Behar Show." He is executive producer of the annual New York Arab-American Comedy Festival and the Amman Stand Up Comedy Festival.

Full Story

“Protest / support the marchers”

Since: Jan 09

Location hidden

#21544 Mar 10, 2013
FFS- wrote:
<quoted text>Actually, God hates all conservatives!
You keep taking his bible and using it to spread hatred and stupidity!
Your post doesn't make any sense.
I verbally attack career criminals (conservatives) who are murdering innocent people as fast as they can, and who are destroying the U.S. and are doing it in God's name, telling the world that God is behind the evil.
It couldn't be more satanic, so I attack them to shock them into stopping the lunacy.
Oh gosh

West Jordan, UT

#21545 Mar 10, 2013
Hey mormons, tell us about your god who was a man, where in the bible does it say that god was a man?

Isn't god eternal (uncreated)?
Oh gosh

West Jordan, UT

#21546 Mar 10, 2013
Father overtime wrote:
Dana denies that everyone will be resurrected.
Every single person will be resurrected.
Dana doesn't think we need to obey the 10 commandments.
Jesus said "if you love me keep my commandments".
Are you going to believe Dana or Jesus?
Mormons= truth. And Christian because I say so. Having ex Mormons say I'm not Christian is not credible. They leave the church, but can't leave it alone. Strange paradox I've seen over and over because once these people reject truth they forever WANT to do evil and find justification in it.
Disagreed, your church is man made. Christ didn't organize a church.....church means body of believers, not an organization.
Oh gosh

West Jordan, UT

#21547 Mar 10, 2013
Father overtime wrote:
So we can all conclude from the bible that we need to do works.
We can conclude that science sides with the Mormons.
We conclude that Mormons are Christians. The name on all 13000 chapels tells me so.
Wrong again....your church name says nothing. Anyone can form a church and call it the church of superman but it doesn't mean superman goes there!

Your jesus is not the jesus in the bible!!
Father overtime

Salt Lake City, UT

#21548 Mar 10, 2013
Oh gosh wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong again....your church name says nothing. Anyone can form a church and call it the church of superman but it doesn't mean superman goes there!
Your jesus is not the jesus in the bible!!
Don't over think what you are reading. Jesus is the son of god. God tells us so.
Your Cross Dresser Lied

Yuba City, CA

#21549 Mar 10, 2013
Oh gosh wrote:
Hey mormons, tell us about your god who was a man, where in the bible does it say that god was a man?
Isn't god eternal (uncreated)?
Let me guess:
When God told me He was going to send His SON
HE was a lying bullshooter,
Because He's not really a man
and that "son" thing's just a scam to cover
for IT - not knowing how to convey to me I don't really have gender.
And neither does IT.

When God told me that the Father BEGAT a SON with a WOMAN
He was a lying bullshooter,
Because He's not really a man, that woman wasn't really pregnant,
and she didn't really give birth to a SON.

This whole "man" "becoming a God" thing
is just a cover for IT not knowing how to convey
IT's genderlessness to me.
So IT lied.
And showed me what was apparently a man becoming a God
instead of not showing me all that, because it's lying
to me
if it's not really true.
---
LYING about this WHOLE "men must become like God" thing.
LYING about this WHOLE "GOD would become a MAN" thing.
LYING about this whole "MAN will become a GOD" thing.

When God told me "THIS IS MY BELOVED SON,
IN WHOM I am WELL PLEASED",
God was LYING: IT was LYING

Because IT can't HAVE a SON and

IT wasn't a SON,
OR a MAN,
that got BAPTIZED in the River Jordon,

IT was an IT MASQUERADING as a MAN.

PEOPLE who CONVEYED this STUNNING news
to you
TOLD you
that WHATEVER happens,
IN NO CASE
should you EVER be TRAPPED
into BELIEVING

God is a MAN,
is OUR FATHER
Jesus Christ is the SON of GOD
our FATHER;
that Jesus Christ became GOD
but was a MAN
before He became GOD.

You are also NOT to believe

that ANYONE ELSE will ever
be like God is, as God is,
even though GOD
the FATHER
& even though GOD
the SON

Command ALL to be LIKE God,
the FATHER,
through being LIKE God,
the SON,

to BE PERFECT EVEN AS GOD
the FATHER is

and that if we struggle to be LIKE God,
when we are resurrected we will be AS God.

And although IT promises we will dwell WITH God,
in God's own Kingdom and also with the SON,
IT's actually lying because of course the SON
really isn't a SON.

That about sum it up?

Because I've got an answer to that.

That cross dressing queen who had you playing games on his lap
wasn't exactly truthful with you when he said the very idea of
Fatherhood,
Motherhood, &
Sonhood,
was filthy and abominable to God.

It was just filthy and abominable
to HIM.

So he made a rule he doesn't have to do any of that low-rent "Father making a Son with one of those FILTHY women" business.

That scam smacks too much of:
not dressing up in a velvet dress,
getting a job, and
not playing LittleBoyLapDance
while he's drunk
for a living.

Go back over the words of God in the Bible
go back over the words of that cross dressing pedophile who told you GOD
is a lying pervert.

God who told you to be like Him isn't the lying pervert.
The lying pervert who told you that you can't be like God

is just a man.
and is the LIAR who's not sure what to tell you
about HIS sexuality.

Much less God's.
Oh gosh

West Jordan, UT

#21550 Mar 10, 2013
Your Cross Dresser Lied wrote:
<quoted text>Let me guess:
When God told me He was going to send His SON
HE was a lying bullshooter,
Because He's not really a man
and that "son" thing's just a scam to cover
for IT - not knowing how to convey to me I don't really have gender.
And neither does IT.
When God told me that the Father BEGAT a SON with a WOMAN
He was a lying bullshooter,
Because He's not really a man, that woman wasn't really pregnant,
and she didn't really give birth to a SON.
This whole "man" "becoming a God" thing
is just a cover for IT not knowing how to convey
IT's genderlessness to me.
So IT lied.
And showed me what was apparently a man becoming a God
instead of not showing me all that, because it's lying
to me
if it's not really true.
---
LYING about this WHOLE "men must become like God" thing.
LYING about this WHOLE "GOD would become a MAN" thing.
LYING about this whole "MAN will become a GOD" thing.
When God told me "THIS IS MY BELOVED SON,
IN WHOM I am WELL PLEASED",
God was LYING: IT was LYING
Because IT can't HAVE a SON and
IT wasn't a SON,
OR a MAN,
that got BAPTIZED in the River Jordon,
IT was an IT MASQUERADING as a MAN.
PEOPLE who CONVEYED this STUNNING news
to you
TOLD you
that WHATEVER happens,
IN NO CASE
should you EVER be TRAPPED
into BELIEVING
God is a MAN,
is OUR FATHER
Jesus Christ is the SON of GOD
our FATHER;
that Jesus Christ became GOD
but was a MAN
before He became GOD.
You are also NOT to believe
that ANYONE ELSE will ever
be like God is, as God is,
even though GOD
the FATHER
& even though GOD
the SON
Command ALL to be LIKE God,
the FATHER,
through being LIKE God,
the SON,
to BE PERFECT EVEN AS GOD
the FATHER is
and that if we struggle to be LIKE God,
when we are resurrected we will be AS God.
And although IT promises we will dwell WITH God,
in God's own Kingdom and also with the SON,
IT's actually lying because of course the SON
really isn't a SON.
That about sum it up?
Because I've got an answer to that.
That cross dressing queen who had you playing games on his lap
wasn't exactly truthful with you when he said the very idea of
Fatherhood,
Motherhood, &
Sonhood,
was filthy and abominable to God.
It was just filthy and abominable
to HIM.
So he made a rule he doesn't have to do any of that low-rent "Father making a Son with one of those FILTHY women" business.
That scam smacks too much of:
not dressing up in a velvet dress,
getting a job, and
not playing LittleBoyLapDance
while he's drunk
for a living.
Go back over the words of God in the Bible
go back over the words of that cross dressing pedophile who told you GOD
is a lying pervert.
God who told you to be like Him isn't the lying pervert.
The lying pervert who told you that you can't be like God
is just a man.
and is the LIAR who's not sure what to tell you
about HIS sexuality.
Much less God's.
Hey moron why you yelling? Your post don't make any sense and its too long!! You said a lot of nothing! Shorten it cause I don't have time to read your blabbing!!
Whats All Thim Wurds

Yuba City, CA

#21551 Mar 10, 2013
Oh gosh wrote:
<quoted text>
Disagreed, your church is man made. Christ didn't organize a church.....church means body of believers, not an organization.
Since there are people who fear you going to hell,
can be levered into being my responsibility,
because you thought about me,
just casually,
sort of offhand,
with a hearty "Thanks for Nothing!"
for about 10 minutes,
similarly to the way you think you going to heaven,
can be levered into being Jesus' responsibility,
because you thought about Him,
just casually, sort of offhand,
with a hearty
"Thanks for Everything!"
for about 10 minutes,
I'm going to let these other guys explain to you what the public school system hasn't been able to:
the answer to that burning question,
"Whats All Thim Wurds?"
Oh gosh

West Jordan, UT

#21552 Mar 10, 2013
Father overtime wrote:
<quoted text>
Don't over think what you are reading. Jesus is the son of god. God tells us so.
Not literally like how u think! It's heresy!!!!

“Too much LDS in the 60's”

Since: Sep 10

Marysville, CA

#21554 Mar 10, 2013
sportxmouse wrote:
Lehi's family came to America... they were descendants from Manasseh (who was the son of Joseph the hero of Hebrews arrival in Egypt).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_of_Joseph_ ...
//
Thus Joseph's stick ( was the Book of Mormon )
Judah's stick (was the Bible)
God's command was to put the two together and make one.
Ezekiel 37:22 says your wrong:
22 and I will make them one nation in the land, on the mountains of Israel; and one king will be king for all of them; and they will no longer be two nations and no longer be divided into two kingdoms.

It's not talking about a "Stick of Mormon." LOL!!!

“Good day to you!”

Since: Oct 08

Earth

#21555 Mar 10, 2013
Dana Robertson wrote:
<quoted text>
You type so much and say so little. The LDS church claimed the Native Americans were the "principle ancestors" of the Laminates who came from Jews. If they were, that would have been discovered 20 yrs ago. They are not. Double talk and BS isn't going to save the Mormon church.
You have intertwined two conversations into a single topic. You did that, not I. I was speaking of the implications of DNA scientists missing a Jewish DNA marker for over 20 years. My comment of this had no direct connection to the BOM. You by error made that connection. I said if they missed a marker that had been in existence for 600 years, how much more possible is it that they could miss a rarer marker that's been around for 1400 years?
You than began a different argument of what word the LDS used to describe the genealogy connection between the American Indians(Lamanites) to the ancient Lamanites and the House of Israel.
Since you forgot what the BOM states as you claimed to have read it so much and so often and now prove yourself a liar again, if you had read the BOM as often as you claim, you would know that in the BOM it states the words 'principal' and the word 'remnant'. Both words used to mean a similar definition that Smith and the LDS church believe today's American Indians on this continent are related to the Lamanites that lived 1400 years ago who were related to the House of Israel.
When you read and listen with hate and anger, you'll never understand anything but your hate and anger.

“Good day to you!”

Since: Oct 08

Earth

#21556 Mar 10, 2013
Dana Robertson wrote:
<quoted text>
Nope, Jesus nor James never taught that works brings salvation.
I didn't even finish reading the rest of your post. Why? Because you began it on a lie. You begin so many posts on lies. Why do you do this? Is it easier to lie for you than to respond to what was actually said? You're entire post is one of lies and mistakes because you built that post on a lie.
You stated I said Jesus and James taught works brings salvation. You stated it that way to make it appear that I said nothing else. And that is your lie. Because I never said 'just' what you stated. I said other things. I never stated works bring salvation.
Let me say that again. I never stated works bring salvation.
So you're a liar to state and infer that is what I said. You're a liar by your own words.
Now grow up, stop resorting to your pathetic, childish lying and respond to what I actually said.
I said Jesus and James taught faith, works and grace brought salvation to the believer. Neither Jesus or James taught grace only brought salvation. Neither Jesus or James taught only faith brought salvation. Neither Jesus or James taught only works brought salvation. Jesus and James through out all of their words taught grace, faith and works brought salvation and nothing less.
If you wish to state other wise you will call Jesus and James liars which would not surprise me.

“Good day to you!”

Since: Oct 08

Earth

#21557 Mar 10, 2013
Dana Robertson wrote:
<quoted text>
No sir, Smith is not the last word on what Mormonism teaches. His authority was passed on to the leaders today. They officially speak for the church and what it represents, you don't. "principle ancestors" was publish with the authority of the LDS leaders in every BoM from 1981 onward, by the LDS church. That makes it an official teaching of the LDS church. Nothing is printed in the LDS edition of the BoM that isn't approved by the General Authorities, nothing.
You're wrong again. Remnant and principle were and are used. Direct descent wasn't used which you claimed was used.

“Good day to you!”

Since: Oct 08

Earth

#21558 Mar 10, 2013
Dana Robertson wrote:
Your BS isn't going to change the facts.
The only BS happening here is your literal translation.
By your logic you use in this case, we can apply it to modern Jews and Jews living 1900 years ago. Know what? Because of assimilation with cultures not a single living Jew has a comparable DNA strand to those Jews living 1900 years ago.
What exist's is a marker. A marker that can be followed back in time by family history. And the marker is different for different types of Jewish lineage.
But none of that will change the fact that Jews today will claim they are DIRECT DESCENDANTS of Jews that lived 1900 years ago even though it isn't a true statement. They will claim to be the remnant and principal ancestor of Jews that lived 1900 years ago and it's a lie as far as DNA proves it a lie.
Jews today may reflect the customs and religion of ancient Jews and even speak the ancient language. But Jews beyond that have just a single, solitary marker to prove any weak factual relationship to Jews living 1900 years ago and that's it.
So except for a race of people that imitates a race of people that lived 1900 years ago, they have no factual connection to them except for a single solitary marker.
And you erroneously expect Mormons to prove more than the Jews can't prove? You're barking up a hollow tree dude. Mormons like Jews, believe a race of people today are related to an ancient race of people that lived centuries ago and they like Jews have no real time factual proof.

“Good day to you!”

Since: Oct 08

Earth

#21559 Mar 10, 2013
Dana Robertson wrote:
<quoted text>
Ezekiel 37:22 says your wrong:
22 and I will make them one nation in the land, on the mountains of Israel; and one king will be king for all of them; and they will no longer be two nations and no longer be divided into two kingdoms.
It's not talking about a "Stick of Mormon." LOL!!!
So tell me than, what one combined nation of Israel sits on it's geographically described mountains? It is referencing a large city and it's not Jerusalem. It's only 2500 feet above sea level and sit's on what many call hills and plains.
The verse stated mountains of Israel.

Since: Sep 12

Location hidden

#21560 Mar 10, 2013
NoMo wrote:
<quoted text>
So, how do you separate the divine from the mistakes?
The Holy Ghost. We need the guidance of the Holy Ghost and modern prophets.

Since: Sep 12

Location hidden

#21562 Mar 10, 2013
No Surprise wrote:
<quoted text>
I didn't see that Sam answered this question of your's yet so I'll try for you.
Sorry, I've been busy.

Since: Sep 12

Location hidden

#21563 Mar 10, 2013
I DONT FEAR THE MAILTRUCK wrote:
What a bunch of
pure-evil,
DYED-in-the-WOOL,
P.S.Y.C.H.L.P.A.T.H.S you people are.
Who is this? Lets all just simmer down a bit and get back to the doctrine of Christ and move away from the name calling.

Since: Sep 12

Location hidden

#21564 Mar 10, 2013
NOT ASHAMED SHOULD BE wrote:
<quoted text>
==========
<quoted text>
=========
"
Now, let me tell you something else.
Let me tell you what I won't do.
I WILL NOT teach my son that masturbation is wrong and if you show me one man( or woman for that matter) who has never done it I will gladly kiss your rear end...
I WILL NOT teach my kids that if they fall in love with someone of the same gender that they are bad people.
I WILL NOT be a cookie cutter Mormon."
-----
You're drunk on Mississippi gender bender extra-syllable wine & fried wild animal grease.
Why don't you stop lying while you're behind?
Good job. Run along and check out the Wal Mart Halloween ads for what to send the kids to church in fag-hag.
Whats up with the mixed aliases?

“Duty is a Privilege!”

Since: Sep 12

Location hidden

#21566 Mar 10, 2013
Dana Robertson wrote:
<quoted text>
Ezekiel 37:22 says your wrong:
22 and I will make them one nation in the land, on the mountains of Israel; and one king will be king for all of them; and they will no longer be two nations and no longer be divided into two kingdoms.
It's not talking about a "Stick of Mormon." LOL!!!
The King of both will be the Lord. You can deny it all you want, but you won't win.

The Stick as in a Scroll/Plates (whatever to write upon)!!!!!!!!!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

South Salt Lake Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
LDS Apostle visited Tonga (Feb '14) 28 min Wanderer2452 28,151
Mormon leaders call for laws protecting some ga... 7 hr Fundieraisers 7
Romney says climate change presents a big chall... Jan 25 Swedenforever 7
Review: Slickrock Towing And Recovery (Nov '12) Jan 24 Sandy Resident 22
Romney Says Climate Change Presents a Big Chall... Jan 22 BarbaraMora 1
Is Ebay's Declining Reputation Scaring Buyers A... (Oct '13) Jan 21 EcommerceBlogger 9
Mocking Religion is an Expression of an Insult Jan 20 Culture Auditor 1
South Salt Lake Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

South Salt Lake People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 3:16 am PST

NBC Sports 3:16AM
Report: Broncos reach out to Wade Phillips with defensive coordinator needed
NBC Sports 4:09 AM
Bears add two more assistants
Bleacher Report 6:03 AM
Is Balance of Power Shifting in AFC West?
NBC Sports 6:14 AM
Michael Bidwill on Larry Fitzgerald: We'll get this worked out
Bleacher Report 7:42 AM
Kubiak the Right Coach, with or Without Peyton