As for the "typo" you continued to make the same "typo" in this post. I am normal, and for you to make an assumption about someone you don't even know or even comprehended their post, proves the abnormality of your gray matter.
Not to be distracted by your attempt to circumvent what I asked you in my first post, I will provide you an example of different things being called the same. Follow me if you can, Pine, Oak, Pecan, Maple, Sequoia, Elm, etc... all different, yet they are called trees. So, male & male, Female & female, Female & male, male & female, each in a loving relationship, committed to each other goes to the court house to obtain documentation proving their love for one another is called a marriage. It is you that wants to change a simple word into something more complicated than it need be. Here is a little word fun for ya. What does the word Blizzard mean? I you think it has to do with a harsh winter storm, then you will realize that you just accepted a word that had its meaning changed so completely that the original use of the word is forgotten. http://podictionary.com/... will explain that to you.
So, again I have shown to you that your the one that is wanting to change the word marriage, from what was taught, & if I was you I would be mad too, but I would not take it out on others, I would work on improving myself, try that for a bit. The only thing I am a victim of is the ability to think for myself, & I wasn't complaining about it.
maybe a typo...but definately a misread if you read my posts...CU's NOT THE SAME...I think i captialize it most times...so there goes the rest of what you said...
here's the kicker...what do i care if you think I'm normal...why do you feel like YOU have to be normal? Irregardless and despite your attempts to make it sound like it...claiming to have a married family when it is naturally impossible to be a family is not the norm...its the exception...now gays want to use the exception to swallow the rule...(cue arguments on vitro, adoption, old couples etc...all exceptions to the NORM or what most people do and have done)
and while you claim to have read them...you clearly missed the point of all my "rants"...different is not inherently inequal...women and men are DIFFERENT...therefore two women is different than a woman and a man...why in the world should different things have the same name?
its the gay inferiority complex again...they are nothing if not victims...