King Jesus or King Obama?
Posted in the South Pasadena Forum
Since: Nov 09
#1 Feb 6, 2013
One of the battle cries of the Revolution was, "We have no king but Jesus!" http://www.youtube.com/watch ...
Jesus was proclaimed King in the Gospels.
"The following Scriptures show us that Jesus was, is, and always will be King! Matthew 2:2 tells us that wise men sought a king. According to Matthew 21:5, Luke 19:38, and John 12:13, Jesus rode into Jerusalem as a king: Jesus died as a King in John 18:37. In I Timothy 1:17 and 6:15, the Apostle Paul worshiped Jesus as King. Then Revelation 17:14 and 19:16 informs us that Christ will come back as conquering King!"- E. Lavern Hayden, 2009. Pastor E. Lavern Hayden is a Co-Pastor at the Wesleyan Pentecostal Church in Cumberland County, NC as well as the State Chaplain for the Constitution Party of North Carolina.
Barak Obama has usurped and even violated the Constitution. He has now usurped Scripture and the rights of private institutions with his arrogant comment regarding the Boy Scouts allowing gays as scout leaders and
“My attitude is that gays and lesbians should have access and opportunity the same way everybody else does, in every institution and walk of life,”
Who does he think he is? King? I have news for him! We have only ONE King Jesus!
Since: Nov 09
#2 Feb 6, 2013
February 4, 2013
Obama’s “recess” appointments to the National Labor Relations Board, like his purported American citizenship, were not legitimized by actual American Law. He made them unconstitutionally while the Senate was in session and not made (as required by the Constitution) between its two sessions when Senators would journey home. The weight of the entire legal structure of the United States federal government was put behind an asinine, transparently false, stupid, perverted and disingenuous explanation that it took to court to defend Obama’s lawless acts.
His many corrupt legal minds,-from the best law colleges, prostituted what little integrity they may have still had by arguing (lying) that the Constitution’s requirement that recess appointments are allowed only when vacancies “happen” while the Senate is in recess, actually means that all vacancies that “happen to exist” when a recess occurs,(i.e., vacancies that have pre-existed for an indefinite period of time), allow the President to appoint whoever the hell he wants without the required consent of Congress just because the Senate is on a temporary, brief intra-session recess or break.
The appellate judges found that argument to be absurd,-that the words mean what they mean as understood by common language and cannot be reinterpreted, distorted, twisted, perverted and modeled to fit the Presidents unconstitutional wishes.
Add your comments below
|Revised EIR on Montebello Hills Proposal Still ...||2 hr||ytw||41|
|The 25 Most Dangerous Cities in the U.S. Are Mo... (Nov '10)||7 hr||Buck Rohde||19,354|
|Two suspected of auto break-ins at Rose Bowl (Sep '10)||8 hr||fuxyiu||8|
|UCLA FOOTBALL NOTEBOOK: Neuheisel says Prince w... (Sep '10)||8 hr||Trojan||27,879|
|Armenian organized crime grows more complex (Oct '10)||18 hr||makerizian||791|
|San Marino Girls School in 1950's? (Apr '10)||18 hr||Sgcheyney||3|
|whats up||23 hr||uoyevol||1|
Find what you want!
Search South Pasadena Forum Now