Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 Full story: www.cnn.com 201,798

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Read more
ForgRats

La Puente, CA

#183851 Mar 19, 2013
Just pack it in and eat on another pile of rat dropings.

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#183852 Mar 19, 2013
Apollo11911 wrote:
<quoted text>Hi Ronnie, the laws in this nation are not based on your book of 10,000 lies.
From the mouth of "I am a God". Nice.
Big D

Modesto, CA

#183853 Mar 19, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
Big D isn't always clear either in thought or expression. Brian G. brings up aspects that others who support SSM simply don't like. Its simply two different ways of looking at the issue. One side says "husband and wife" to the exclusion of all others, the other side says "spouses for life" regardless of gender composition, and exclusivity.
You donít comprehend it, but other people do.

In fact the majority of Americans do
Big D

Modesto, CA

#183854 Mar 19, 2013
Apollo11911 wrote:
<quoted text>Hi Ronnie, the laws in this nation are not based on your book of 10,000 lies.
Yes, in fact the father of the American revolution actually wrote it in a signed government document when he became president that we were in no way founded upon the Christian religion.
Big D

Modesto, CA

#183855 Mar 19, 2013
Dusty Mangina wrote:
<quoted text>
We're not a theocracy, stud. We're a democratic republic.
Good grief... someone got it right!:)

We are indeed
Ronald

Long Beach, CA

#183856 Mar 19, 2013
Apollo11911 wrote:
<quoted text>Hi Ronnie, the laws in this nation are not based on your book of 10,000 lies.
Apollo11911.

Yes. That is the prevailing myth that the Godless "Liberals" have been increasingly promoting ever since the Republicans undermined States rights by inflicting their 14th Amendment upon the nation. The fact is, though, we are a nation of States. All of our State Constitutions express their purpose that our people might be free to worship and to enjoy the many blessings of God.

Source: http://tinyurl.com/c5sxpt4

Even prior to the States being formed, then existing entities were all - without exception - dedicated for the purpose of glorifying God. That fact was common knowledge until the Godless "Liberals" used the Republican's infamous 14th Amendment for the purpose of "dumbing down" American education in Brown v Topeka Board of Ed.

Source: http://tinyurl.com/rhts

Ronald
Xavier Breath

Hoboken, NJ

#183857 Mar 19, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
So if a gay person marries, of their own free will, some one of the opposite sex, are they a first class, or second class citizen?
Would you like a gay man to marry your daughter?
Xavier Breath

Hoboken, NJ

#183858 Mar 19, 2013
martinezjosei wrote:
<quoted text>
Correct!
But Muslims are making up the difference!
We should have ZERO Muslim immigration, not a continued open door to potential enemies.
You do realize we have freedom of religion in the USA, don't you?
Xavier Breath

Hoboken, NJ

#183859 Mar 19, 2013
Ronald wrote:
<quoted text>
Big D.
Exactly. It is always darkest before the dawn. According to the historical record:
"Remember this, and shew yourselves men: bring it again to mind, O ye transgressors." (Isaiah 46:8)
"Remember the former things of old: for I am God, and there is none else; I am God, and there is none like me," (Isaiah 46:9)
"Declaring the end from the beginning, and from ancient times the things that are not yet done, saying, My counsel shall stand, and I will do all my pleasure:" (Isaiah 46:10)
"Therefore rejoice, ye heavens, and ye that dwell in them. Woe to the inhabiters of the earth and of the sea! for the devil is come down unto you, having great wrath, because he knoweth that he hath but a short time.(Revelation 12:12)
"And when the dragon saw that he was cast unto the earth, he persecuted the woman which brought forth the man child." (Revelation 12:13)
"And the dragon was wroth with the woman, and went to make war with the remnant of her seed, which keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ." (Revelation 12:17)
"Then shall they deliver you up to be afflicted, and shall kill you: and ye shall be hated of all nations for my name's sake." (Matthew 24:9)
"And then shall many be offended, and shall betray one another, and shall hate one another." (Matthew 24:10)
"And many false prophets shall rise, and shall deceive many." (Matthew 24:11)
"And because iniquity shall abound, the love of many shall wax cold." (Matthew 24:12)
"But he that shall endure unto the end, the same shall be saved." (Matthew 24:13)
Ronald
Look, nutbag.... your Buybull is NOT an historical record.
Xavier Breath

Hoboken, NJ

#183860 Mar 19, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
Brian G. brings up aspects that others who support SSM simply don't like.
Have you read any of his posts? I know children who have a better grasp of logic. His posts are exercises in semantics and hyperbole. Like or dislike is irrelevant.
Ronald

Long Beach, CA

#183862 Mar 19, 2013
Dusty Mangina wrote:
<quoted text>
We're not a theocracy, stud. We're a democratic republic.
Dusty Mangina.

Exactly. The republican rule is subject to Constitutional law. Unlike what the post 60s 70s era Godless "Liberal" political activists would have us believe, "Democratic republics" are antipodal to that of "a democracy".

Our Christian non-Homosexual founding fathers were sticklers about detail. Yet, at 1787 years after Jesus, they all affixed their name to the document that established the Constitution "in the year of our Lord, 1787". The best Godless "Liberals" and their community activist bedfellows can come up to explain this away is that the dead White men suddenly became disinterested in detail, in favor of "a living Constitution".

Source: http://tinyurl.com/cxrqmhv

Ronald
Big D

Modesto, CA

#183863 Mar 19, 2013
Ronald wrote:
<quoted text>
Dusty Mangina.
Exactly. The republican rule is subject to Constitutional law. Unlike what the post 60s 70s era Godless "Liberal" political activists would have us believe, "Democratic republics" are antipodal to that of "a democracy".
Our Christian non-Homosexual founding fathers were sticklers about detail. Yet, at 1787 years after Jesus, they all affixed their name to the document that established the Constitution "in the year of our Lord, 1787". The best Godless "Liberals" and their community activist bedfellows can come up to explain this away is that the dead White men suddenly became disinterested in detail, in favor of "a living Constitution".
Source: http://tinyurl.com/cxrqmhv
Ronald
You are free to believe in your little religion, but you are not going to force your beliefs on any of the rest of us.

It was written as a living constitution from the beginning, it was our founders that coined the phrase "separation of church and state" it was John Adams that signed the treaty of Tripoli which stated we were not in any way formed as a Christian nation.

You are free to believe your religion, but we will not accept your tynary of law, you will not enforce your petty little belief system on the rest of us.

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#183864 Mar 19, 2013
Apollo11911 wrote:
<quoted text>Or just because a few states have allowed slavery in their states, why should they have to as well, when the voters of the latter states said no?
For a god....sometimes you sound like a mere mortal. Comparing the issue of slavery, which was ultimately settled after much death and destruction to voting to maintain the legal definition of marriage as a union of husband and wife, is ridiculous. Oh Madone!

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#183865 Mar 19, 2013
Xavier Breath wrote:
<quoted text>
Would you like a gay man to marry your daughter?
I would like my daughter to marry a man who will treat her with love and respect. If he's gay, they both know it, and they choose to marry, would you say its not a valid union of husband and wife. Suppose a lesbian married a man, would their marriage be any less valid than any other husband and wife union?
Big D

Modesto, CA

#183866 Mar 19, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
For a god....sometimes you sound like a mere mortal. Comparing the issue of slavery, which was ultimately settled after much death and destruction to voting to maintain the legal definition of marriage as a union of husband and wife, is ridiculous. Oh Madone!
Yes women got the vote with only a fraction of the violence ( although there was some ) and homosexuals will get the right to marry with even less.

Our nation is growing up, freedom is won by showing people what is right, instead of violence

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#183867 Mar 19, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
You are free to believe in your little religion, but you are not going to force your beliefs on any of the rest of us.
It was written as a living constitution from the beginning, it was our founders that coined the phrase "separation of church and state" it was John Adams that signed the treaty of Tripoli which stated we were not in any way formed as a Christian nation.
You are free to believe your religion, but we will not accept your tynary of law, you will not enforce your petty little belief system on the rest of us.
Surprise Big D, that "petty little belief system" is all around, and to a certain degree, "forced on the rest of us". In God We Trust adorns our currency, the President is sworn into office with his hand on a Bible, cities are named after saints, sports teams have religious names, and on it goes. You should come down from the mountain more often, mix among the common folk.
Yes yes yes

La Puente, CA

#183869 Mar 19, 2013
Yes, the people who post stupid comments and or positions are as nuts as RNC, GOP, Republican and Tea Party member's.

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#183870 Mar 19, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes women got the vote with only a fraction of the violence ( although there was some ) and homosexuals will get the right to marry with even less.
Our nation is growing up, freedom is won by showing people what is right, instead of violence
Homosexuals have the right to marry, to enter into a legally recognized union of husband and wife valid in all fifty states, just like any body else. The catch is they don't wish to exercise that right like everybody else.
Freedom is not unlimited, nor without government regulation. Marriage is no different. Why do you speak of freedom by subjecting one's intimate personal sexual relationship to government control? It seems what you ask for is not what you actually seek.
Big D

Modesto, CA

#183871 Mar 19, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
Surprise Big D, that "petty little belief system" is all around, and to a certain degree, "forced on the rest of us". In God We Trust adorns our currency, the President is sworn into office with his hand on a Bible, cities are named after saints, sports teams have religious names, and on it goes. You should come down from the mountain more often, mix among the common folk.
Oh I am aware of that, I have my own petty beliefs, donít take offense.

Every president does so by a choice, that is their choice. I did notice when I was a jury Forman recently that all mention of it has been removed from the courts, only affirming they will tell the truth. I donít mind when your beliefs and rules of that belief is a choice, it is only when you try to apply your beliefs to others not of you belief that you are going to run into a brick wall.

I actually defend your right to believe this religion or that religion and I will help see to it that your children are not preached to from a position of authority by other religions as well.

I was never on the mountain so to speak, but many others that have been there for a long time are being shown the way down.

We are growing up, the time of Santa Claus is passing. It will take a long time, I know... but it is good to see it well started.
heartandmind

Moline, IL

#183873 Mar 19, 2013
Xavier Breath wrote:
<quoted text>
Have you read any of his posts? I know children who have a better grasp of logic. His posts are exercises in semantics and hyperbole. Like or dislike is irrelevant.
or, to put it differently, they're bumperstickers.

your last sentence is entirely true.

just wait until ol' brian likens same sex marriage to sex with a corpse.

ugh.

maybe in his little world that's how sex is - but not in most other people's worlds.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

South Pasadena Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News UCLA FOOTBALL NOTEBOOK: Neuheisel says Prince w... (Sep '10) 19 min Trojan 29,290
News Montebello City Council votes 3-2 to give city ... 2 hr Wonder Why 23
Which Gangs are fighting each other here in May... (Jun '10) 3 hr 3rdeyenavigator 84
News The 25 Most Dangerous Cities in the U.S. Are Mo... (Nov '10) 5 hr Batch 37 Pain Is ... 19,728
Stop Sign on La Merced 7 hr La Merced Dude 1
News Council rejects Kare offer (Sep '08) 9 hr Redinca 267
pa***in relief sizzurp kwsh for all 10 hr joe kush 1

Beach Hazards Statement for Los Angeles County was issued at March 30 at 4:52PM PDT

South Pasadena Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

South Pasadena People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]