Judge overturns California's ban on s...

Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201845 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#179299 Feb 11, 2013
Verba Delenda wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, and presumably a man would be allowed to "marry" his brother, father or son, and a woman to "marry" her sister, mother or daughter, inasmuch as no risk of deleterious inbreeding would be entailed therein.
Thus legal ssm raises the question, "where does society draw the line?", or at what point does it become pointless?

Jazybird58

“Reality bites”

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#179300 Feb 11, 2013
Frankie RIzzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Ha ha swimming pool in my head so funny.
You're an idiot, son.
I am thinking about a basketball court as well. Its fun living in your head rent free.

Jazybird58

“Reality bites”

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#179301 Feb 11, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
Try thinking outside the rainbow box. Don't worry it won't hurt.
Still searching for a clue, one day you might just find one. Stranger things have happened

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#179302 Feb 11, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
Rose
Why does it bother you so? Why is it okay for a woman to call another woman, "her wife", but not a man to call two women, his "wives"? Will gay people stop getting married if plural marriage is legalized?
Look up the term "straw man argument".

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#179303 Feb 11, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Look up the term "straw man argument".
Rosie

Sigh......why is it so hard for you to fathom that "marriage equality", can be, and is, used to promote consentual plural marriage? America's favorite plural marriage family, the Browns, have gone on tee vee numerous times, expressing their support for ssm, and comparing that "struggle" with their struggle. Why not just accept it. As much as you and all the other SSMers want everyone else to accept gay marriage, you should also accept plural marriage. Marriage equaltity demands that you do.
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

#179304 Feb 11, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Look up the term "straw man argument".
Be sure to tell the judge to do that when polygamy comes to court.
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

#179305 Feb 11, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
Try thinking outside the rainbow box. Don't worry it won't hurt.
Actually it probably will hurt in Jazybird58's case.
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

#179306 Feb 11, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
Rosie
Sigh......why is it so hard for you to fathom that "marriage equality", can be, and is, used to promote consentual plural marriage? America's favorite plural marriage family, the Browns, have gone on tee vee numerous times, expressing their support for ssm, and comparing that "struggle" with their struggle. Why not just accept it. As much as you and all the other SSMers want everyone else to accept gay marriage, you should also accept plural marriage. Marriage equaltity demands that you do.
Excellent post.

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#179307 Feb 11, 2013
Oh Rosie...this one is for you;

http://www.canyoncountryzephyr.com/2012/02/01 ...
It’s hard to imagine the gay community and the fundamentalist Mormon community agreeing on anything, but the Sister Wives are smart to look to gay rights achievements for their inspiration. I can’t imagine how any judge would rule against them—a group of consenting adults who have lived responsibly with each other for years—but it’s possible that they will have a long fight ahead of them. It’s possible that it will be a still longer fight until they receive the right to legally marry. And then who knows what battle will come next—which other groups will follow, rising up to claim the same rights as their neighbors. All I know is that more are coming. And I wish all the best to them.

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#179308 Feb 11, 2013
Your semantic ejaculations are irrelevant. More states are adopting marriage equality all the time. When people have a license in their hands, they don't give a sh1t what's in your heart.

See, you're irrelevant.

I'm Kimare's vagina and I approved this message.
Free WiFi

Monrovia, CA

#179309 Feb 11, 2013
Looks like the "out of towners" gin mill has gotten into high gear, again!
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

#179310 Feb 11, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
Oh Rosie...this one is for you;
http://www.canyoncountryzephyr.com/2012/02/01 ...
It’s hard to imagine the gay community and the fundamentalist Mormon community agreeing on anything, but the Sister Wives are smart to look to gay rights achievements for their inspiration. I can’t imagine how any judge would rule against them—a group of consenting adults who have lived responsibly with each other for years—but it’s possible that they will have a long fight ahead of them. It’s possible that it will be a still longer fight until they receive the right to legally marry. And then who knows what battle will come next—which other groups will follow, rising up to claim the same rights as their neighbors. All I know is that more are coming. And I wish all the best to them.
Let me predict her response. Polygamy is a "non issue". Or "it's not an equal rights issue, it just isn't". Or "If a polygamist goes to the JP..." oh, hell you know her all her dopey responses!
spike-a-roo

Los Angeles, CA

#179311 Feb 11, 2013
Frankie RIzzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Excellent post.
A.ssss kisser!
Bruno

Los Angeles, CA

#179312 Feb 11, 2013
Frankie RIzzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Naah. Sure, it works for you but I don't like to have sex with guys.
The nibble marks on at least sixty-five San Franciscan kokks say you do.
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

#179314 Feb 11, 2013
Bruno wrote:
<quoted text>
The nibble marks on at least sixty-five San Franciscan kokks say you do.
You're the man to know. I haven't seen 65 different dicks in my life.
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

#179315 Feb 11, 2013
spike-a-roo wrote:
<quoted text>
A.ssss kisser!
Troll.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#179316 Feb 11, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
Rosie
Sigh......why is it so hard for you to fathom that "marriage equality", can be, and is, used to promote consentual plural marriage?
America's favorite plural marriage family, the Browns, have gone on tee vee numerous times, expressing their support for ssm, and comparing that "struggle" with their struggle. Why not just accept it. As much as you and all the other SSMers want everyone else to accept gay marriage, you should also accept plural marriage. Marriage equaltity demands that you do.
Everybody already has marriage equality when it comes to plural marriage.
Should everybody be able to marry more than one person? Why not start a forum about that subject?
Bruno

Los Angeles, CA

#179317 Feb 11, 2013
Frankie RIzzo wrote:
<quoted text>
You're the man to know. I haven't seen 65 different dicks in my life.
My mistake. Make that sixty-six. I forgot about your dad.

Jazybird58

“Reality bites”

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#179319 Feb 11, 2013
Frankie RIzzo wrote:
<quoted text>
You're the man . I have seen 65 different dicks in my life.
Bragger
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

#179320 Feb 11, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Everybody already has marriage equality when it comes to plural marriage.
Should everybody be able to marry more than one person? Why not start a forum about that subject?
No they don't. You can't do it, you'll go to prison. That's equality?

How can you with a straight face I presume, expect us to swallow that bullsh!t?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

South Pasadena Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News The 25 Most Dangerous Cities in the U.S. Are Mo... (Nov '10) 1 hr Zeke the Pinhead 20,178
Review: Financial Plus Investment (Jul '08) 3 hr El Manda Mas 2,937
Don't vote for Hillary Clinton, she is satani... 3 hr Alison DC 3
Rev. Dr. Trevor Smith 4 hr Leza K 5
News Nearly 1,000 in L.A. join nationwide protests f... (Apr '15) 5 hr Ed Edn Eddy 2
News Palo Alto: Four arrested in theft of truck cont... 7 hr Mike Honka 2
News UCLA FOOTBALL NOTEBOOK: Neuheisel says Prince w... (Sep '10) 7 hr Papi Chulo 32,247
More from around the web

Personal Finance

South Pasadena Mortgages