Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 Full story: www.cnn.com 201,794

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Read more
Jane Dodo

Hoboken, NJ

#174554 Jan 12, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
Making up sights out of your imagination? Everything the bible says is true, but you have no reason to believe that the bible means he saw the world from mountains, as it doesn't mean that, you are very assuming.
Everything the Buybull says is true, eh? Really? Are you sure you want to stick with that?
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#174555 Jan 12, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Excellent post!
Thank you, sir. Just doing my part....
Jane Dodo

Hoboken, NJ

#174556 Jan 12, 2013
Randy -Rock- Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
"It refused to allow any marriage, except between man and woman. Thus excluding polygamy, as it did SSM. Any argument that defends SSM must also defend polygamy, for the exact same reasons, freedom of choice" That is where, through omission.
So if Prop 8 is overturned, polygamy becomes legal? No, it doesn't. I wonder why.....
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#174557 Jan 12, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
But you weren't implying that at first! You were before saying you weren't bothered to defend monogamy! Not very loyal to God are you?
You must be in need of spectacles, my good man. Why not use some of that National Health dosh, and go and get some, or is your UB40 going to help you with that ?
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#174558 Jan 12, 2013
Honestly, large, you should spend less time in Ladbroke Grove...
Loppers

Monrovia, CA

#174560 Jan 12, 2013
For those who want to "Know."

SGVCOG governing board will be having a meeting Thusday, January 17, 2013

At 6:00 p.m. location; Southern California Edison CTAC, 6090 North Irwindale Avenue, Irwindale, Ca.

27 agenda items have been posted.

www.SGVCOG.org
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#174562 Jan 12, 2013
Hey, large, why not try spewing your old claptrap in Hyde Park on a Sunday afternoon, next to the communists and see how the crowd receives you ?
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#174564 Jan 12, 2013
Jane Dodo wrote:
<quoted text>
So if Prop 8 is overturned, polygamy becomes legal? No, it doesn't. I wonder why.....
You are reaching now, but if you defend SSM, you must also defend polygamy, or is it an elitist attitude, one designed to make you feel superior to another discriminated class ? Because you defend one misunderstood group, yet shyte upon another. Your side claims to have been demonized, yet you ignore the fact that polygamists have also been demonized.
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#174566 Jan 12, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Mona Lott (Jane Dodo) is a hypocrite. Plain and simple.
Good old Liza Lott.
Largelanguage

Wrexham, UK

#174567 Jan 12, 2013
Jane Dodo wrote:
<quoted text>
Everything the Buybull says is true, eh? Really? Are you sure you want to stick with that?
I know thy word!
Largelanguage

Wrexham, UK

#174568 Jan 12, 2013
Randy -Rock- Hudson wrote:
Honestly, large, you should spend less time in Ladbroke Grove...
Why are you being so disrespectful to God? What if God exists? Fear of the lord is the beginning of wisdosm, and yet you show no fear of the possibility of him! You will always remain a foolish agnostic, switch to athiesm instead.
Largelanguage

Wrexham, UK

#174569 Jan 12, 2013
Randy -Rock- Hudson wrote:
Hey, large, why not try spewing your old claptrap in Hyde Park on a Sunday afternoon, next to the communists and see how the crowd receives you ?
Of course common sense among people is rejected. And of course it would show a lack of commom decency and folly to do such! But you reject your own God, and the chance to speak and accept God, with your opportunity, where the truth can speak!
Largelanguage

Wrexham, UK

#174570 Jan 12, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
What the hell is a first church of God and why should I care about it?
Ephesus, the first church, who God appointed and aplauded for holding people who confess to be believers to account!

Since: Jan 10

Lewis Center, OH

#174571 Jan 12, 2013
Randy -Rock- Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
You are reaching now, but if you defend SSM, you must also defend polygamy, or is it an elitist attitude, one designed to make you feel superior to another discriminated class ? Because you defend one misunderstood group, yet shyte upon another. Your side claims to have been demonized, yet you ignore the fact that polygamists have also been demonized.
Mike/Rock, You couldnít be more wrong. First of all you have no right or authority to tell anyone what they should think, believe or support. Your point of view is merely another way of marginalizing and vilifying Gay Americans. Put simply, saying I have to believe in and support any conceived civil injustice to deserve the right to marry is the real elitist attitude being conveyed in your messages. Youíll have to concoct a new talking point against Gay Marriage as to date you havenít had one.
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#174572 Jan 12, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
Why are you being so disrespectful to God? What if God exists? Fear of the lord is the beginning of wisdosm, and yet you show no fear of the possibility of him! You will always remain a foolish agnostic, switch to athiesm instead.
You are extrapolating incorrectly, as you do. I respect God, and accept Him, as my kind does. Why are you being so disrespectful to truth, and claiming that I do not ? I will not take your advice, however, as I think that I am the one who is where he needs to be, maybe you should give witchcraft a try, so as to learn to open your eyes. As one Brit to another (just between you and I), you are embarrassing me, why not belt up ?
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#174573 Jan 12, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
Of course common sense among people is rejected. And of course it would show a lack of commom decency and folly to do such! But you reject your own God, and the chance to speak and accept God, with your opportunity, where the truth can speak!
Ahh, I see you've gone to Hyde Park, already. My own god ? I have 2, a matched set, both male and female, perfectly balanced. Truth is truth, what are you trying, so desperately, to say ? Come on, man, a ha'penny for your thoughts, although that would be an inflated price...
Largelanguage

Buckley, UK

#174574 Jan 12, 2013
Randy -Rock- Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
You are reaching now, but if you defend SSM, you must also defend polygamy, or is it an elitist attitude, one designed to make you feel superior to another discriminated class ? Because you defend one misunderstood group, yet shyte upon another. Your side claims to have been demonized, yet you ignore the fact that polygamists have also been demonized.
But you weren't saying that at first! You were unloyal to God and decided not defend polygamy. If you are an agnostic, you should accept and feat the Lord and his glory, for the possibilty of his existence. And how come you are an agnostic, and yet make such a strong stance against homosexuality, but yet not of the existence of God?
Largelanguage

Buckley, UK

#174575 Jan 12, 2013
Marram wrote:
<quoted text>
Mike/Rock, You couldnít be more wrong. First of all you have no right or authority to tell anyone what they should think, believe or support. Your point of view is merely another way of marginalizing and vilifying Gay Americans. Put simply, saying I have to believe in and support any conceived civil injustice to deserve the right to marry is the real elitist attitude being conveyed in your messages. Youíll have to concoct a new talking point against Gay Marriage as to date you havenít had one.
Look mikey, even a wicked pagan can see you are making such a strong stance about something you don't know about! Do you make such a stance against homosexuality in hope that God does exist and take the risk of bigotry, but don't seem to care about God enough to fear him?
Largelanguage

Buckley, UK

#174576 Jan 12, 2013
Randy -Rock- Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
You are extrapolating incorrectly, as you do. I respect God, and accept Him, as my kind does. Why are you being so disrespectful to truth, and claiming that I do not ? I will not take your advice, however, as I think that I am the one who is where he needs to be, maybe you should give witchcraft a try, so as to learn to open your eyes. As one Brit to another (just between you and I), you are embarrassing me, why not belt up ?
Then how come you aren't being loyal to God and defending monogamy?
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#174577 Jan 12, 2013
Marram wrote:
<quoted text>
Mike/Rock, You couldnít be more wrong. First of all you have no right or authority to tell anyone what they should think, believe or support. Your point of view is merely another way of marginalizing and vilifying Gay Americans. Put simply, saying I have to believe in and support any conceived civil injustice to deserve the right to marry is the real elitist attitude being conveyed in your messages. Youíll have to concoct a new talking point against Gay Marriage as to date you havenít had one.
Silly boi, your own words betray you, as Chongos does to him. "New", in the face of your claim that there hasn't been one yet ? Pishtosh, old fruit, I've made many, it's just that the big words have confused your bumpkin ass. I am not marginalizing anyone, merely disputing the claim that a group that wishes to be included in a club, since this group lacks the proper credentials. It lacks the necessary components, and fails to meet the minimum criteria. There is nothing elitist in demanding a certain minimum standard be met. Can't you see that ? And I am not refusing to allow them to be gay, it's just that setting the bar is getting in their way. Much like disallowing illiterate children to claim that they've graduated.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

South Pasadena Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
you try too hard 19 min tellinitlikeitis 7
I need someone 27 min tellinitlikeitis 4
News Mel Gibson apologizes for drunk driving (Jul '06) 1 hr swedenforever 31
News Band director accused of rape (Jul '08) 2 hr to steven sucks d... 530
News The 25 Most Dangerous Cities in the U.S. Are Mo... (Nov '10) 4 hr trying 19,718
News Montebello City Council votes 3-2 to give city ... 4 hr 42 yr North Mtb r... 18
Marco Rubio in 2016! 5 hr Tony 29

Beach Hazards Statement for Los Angeles County was issued at March 28 at 3:07PM PDT

South Pasadena Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

South Pasadena People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]