Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 Full story: www.cnn.com 201,743

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Read more
Largelanguage

Wrexham, UK

#174485 Jan 12, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
OK, so you can't tell me a buy-bull prophesy that has come true.
The evolvement of the seven churches.
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#174486 Jan 12, 2013
sheesh void of hate wrote:
<quoted text>
So by your standards everything should be illegal until it is proven safe.
Put more correctly: Things should be left alone, until need is shown for change.
Largelanguage

Wrexham, UK

#174487 Jan 12, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
It says that god said, "Let there be light". Then in the next couple of verses, there was night and day. Then plants. Night and day and plants before there is a sun (somewhere around Genesis 1:16). Absurd.
God made light first, so light was what first existed. Then plants and animals. Now it said the sun was created after the 7 day cycle was mentioned, it is not related. And do you speak to believers much? You must know a fair amount of people within the church to recall people who say they want to save marriage but yet divorce. How were you raised?
Largelanguage

Wrexham, UK

#174488 Jan 12, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
So, it's not all literally true? Fine.
I just don't get why so many Christians insist everything in the buy-bull is literally true when so much of it is clearly absurd.
Making up sights out of your imagination? Everything the bible says is true, but you have no reason to believe that the bible means he saw the world from mountains, as it doesn't mean that, you are very assuming.
Largelanguage

Wrexham, UK

#174490 Jan 12, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Man up. I didn't say anything about the Roman Catholics and the fall of Rome. They weren't around at the time.
The saxons were around, no one said they weren't.
Largelanguage

Wrexham, UK

#174491 Jan 12, 2013
Jane Dodo wrote:
<quoted text>
hahahahaha
hahahahaha
ahahahahah
Did you learn THAT from Jane Dough, too?
So if Prop 8 is overturned, does that mean polygamy will be legal in California? Of course not. It's a completely seperate issue. Prop 8 has NOTHING to do with polygamy.
You support having sex with all! Of course you do! Thats what gay marriage is really about! And mikey is also very rebellious to the sciptures by not supporting monogamy.
Micky DiRucci

Union City, CA

#174492 Jan 12, 2013
sheesh void of hate wrote:
"What is hilarious is that the verbosity of your posts."
Should be:
What is hilarious is the verbosity of your posts.
What is hilarious is that your post complaining of his verbosity is five times more verbose than the post you are complaining about!

Too Funny!
Largelanguage

Wrexham, UK

#174493 Jan 12, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
Is this thread done yet?
I've met this idiot who calls himself wastewater before. "WasteProduct" is little more than a child trying to be some sort of grown up. One has to wonder what causes the minds of children to gain futile silly thoughts!
Largelanguage

Wrexham, UK

#174494 Jan 12, 2013
Randy Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Mike was being sarcastic. Of course he knew the definition of "red herring", just like the rest of us.
Did he really? Its difficult to expect someone who is not honest with God and allows polygamy against the bible to be honest with us. Maybe he pretended to know, and was pretending to be sarcastic, to cover his ignorance.
Largelanguage

Wrexham, UK

#174495 Jan 12, 2013
Randy Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Er, I'm the wicked pagan, and I agree with Mikey, polygamy is another facet of the issue. We are not allowed to use God, or Christianity, in this forum, it has been targeted by the resident self-appointed arbiters of moral correctness. The poofs. They have decided to act as our moral compasses, and deny any reasons to deprive them of their pet project, namely the undermining of moral fiber.
Why do you bother supporting anti homosexuality but yet reject monogamy? Is it because you don't support your God lorally like a good believer and just to gain a little pride in yourself? You reject the branches you came from! What a rebellious child of God! I accept and loyally fight for Gods name on all fronts, and yet you are too lazy for that! What does proverbs say about lazy men? Were you lazy as a child as well?
Largelanguage

Wrexham, UK

#174496 Jan 12, 2013
Randy Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry, mate, it was the Visigoths, led by Alaric.
But most of these stupid liberals assume it was constantine! How stupid!
Largelanguage

Wrexham, UK

#174497 Jan 12, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Why are you fundies such racists? Do you believe Jesus died for black people?
(Didn't read the rest of your post.)
He was saying "even" as in "yes, including them". Figure it out yourself moron!
Largelanguage

Wrexham, UK

#174498 Jan 12, 2013
Miley DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
They are also the self appointed thread judge, jury and police. Anything that threatens their dogma is "off topic". Continued controversy causes banning.
Notice the extreme hypocrisy when alternate forms of marriage other than same sex are even mentioned.
Unfortunately these clowns give same sex marriage a bad rap. I don't see the pressing need for it but I also don't see much harm. The only harm I see in it is the stupid dishonest zealotry demonstrated by these assholes like Rose_NoHo.
And yet you behave like a wicked hevean! You don't go against all their hypocracy and show them as a believer should how one ought ot behave by actually going against it! You are a traitor to the church, and can't accept it to fight on all sides! You are your own censor, appointing yourself saying what you should and shouldn't support! Do you believe the silly doctrines of your little pulpit claiming you are God, cherrypicking the verse that says we are one with God?
Largelanguage

Wrexham, UK

#174499 Jan 12, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Homosexuality isn't a problem, behavioral or otherwise. Homosexuality isn't a behavior. And everybody seeks society's approval to one degree or another. BTW, ugly, I'm straight. And, why marry if you don't need emotional support?
So you want to be loved, but yet you don't want to love? Is that what you are saying? How self absorbed!
Largelanguage

Wrexham, UK

#174500 Jan 12, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Homosexuality isn't a problem, behavioral or otherwise. Homosexuality isn't a behavior. And everybody seeks society's approval to one degree or another. BTW, ugly, I'm straight. And, why marry if you don't need emotional support?
Actually rose, Hudson did it by accident when "he" claimed that the penguin book promoted homosexuality. That claim actually came from the source he was using. But you already knew that, so one can assume you tried to just jump in there and accuse!
Kippers

Monrovia, CA

#174501 Jan 12, 2013
That means like Piers Morgan, the goon that just will not go away.

Boy Cott CNN and it's sponsors until this jack is gone.
Micky DiRucci

Union City, CA

#174502 Jan 12, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
Did he really? Its difficult to expect someone who is not honest with God and allows polygamy against the bible to be honest with us. Maybe he pretended to know, and was pretending to be sarcastic, to cover his ignorance.
Or maybe you're stupid!
Micky DiRucci

Union City, CA

#174503 Jan 12, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
And yet you behave like a wicked hevean! You don't go against all their hypocracy and show them as a believer should how one ought ot behave by actually going against it! You are a traitor to the church, and can't accept it to fight on all sides! You are your own censor, appointing yourself saying what you should and shouldn't support! Do you believe the silly doctrines of your little pulpit claiming you are God, cherrypicking the verse that says we are one with God?
I am not a believer in fundamentalist zealotry so can it jackass.

What a dope!
Largelanguage

Wrexham, UK

#174504 Jan 12, 2013
Micky DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
And man does not equal woman.
Are you gender blind? Why not number blind too? Why is one more valid than the other?
Jane DoDo and his undeveloped mindset cannot grasp that 1 + 3 = 4 is not equal to 2 + 2 = 4.
Kippers

Monrovia, CA

#174505 Jan 12, 2013
This means Piers Morgan, the gooseStepper that just will not go away.

BoyCott CNN and it's sponsors until this union-jack waver is gone from american air waves.

Being that this UK, idiot posts here too!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

South Pasadena Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News UCLA FOOTBALL NOTEBOOK: Neuheisel says Prince w... (Sep '10) 57 min mike tirico 29,261
make money from home! 1 hr anti aging 1
News State orders audit of Marin family court (Jul '09) 3 hr Very Concerned 870
News Suspect in fatal shooting of Whittier teenager ... (Mar '12) 9 hr bhesh 122
Amazon.com Kindle Publishing: Never Do Business... 11 hr legendary-author2015 1
News The 25 Most Dangerous Cities in the U.S. Are Mo... (Nov '10) 11 hr factcheck 19,717
Too Many Cars Parked On The Streets 19 hr Concerned Bystander 19

Beach Hazards Statement for Los Angeles County was issued at March 26 at 2:00PM PDT

South Pasadena Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

South Pasadena People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]