Judge overturns California's ban on s...

Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201891 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#173918 Jan 8, 2013
WHY DOES IT MATTER wrote:
If you want to marr a rock it is your desition, but dont't make it a law.
our vote doesn't count any more... THAT'S ILLEGAL!!!!
What's ILLEGAL!!!! is denying people equal protection under the law. Even when doing so is popular with dummies like you. Why do you think we have a Constitution, courts, checks and balances, and don't just vote on everything? Because, as they say, democracy is 3 wolves and a sheep voting on what's for dinner.

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#173919 Jan 8, 2013
Mikey DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
I find it difficult to see the logic of defending monogamous marriage as the historic norm when the laws of many states have already departed from the principle that it is heterosexual, monogamous marriage that is essential to social stability.
Put bluntly, if heterosexuality is no longer legally, morally or socially relevant to marriage, why should monogamy continue to be so important?
Red herring.
Polygamy just isn't an equal rights issue, gay marriage is.
Notice I'm not arguing for or against polygamy.
Mikey DiRucci

Hayward, CA

#173920 Jan 8, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Red herring.
Polygamy just isn't an equal rights issue, gay marriage is.
Notice I'm not arguing for or against polygamy.
Polygamy is marriage worthy of the same respect and consideration as SSM.

It is not a fish. It is an equal rights issue.
Mikey DiRucci

Hayward, CA

#173921 Jan 8, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Red herring.
Polygamy just isn't an equal rights issue, gay marriage is.
Notice I'm not arguing for or against polygamy.
Red herring.
Gay marriage just isn't an equal rights issue, polygamy is.
Notice I'm not arguing for or against gay marriage.
Mikey DiRucci

Hayward, CA

#173924 Jan 8, 2013
I take it the consensus among the people of tolerance and diversity is:

SSM GOOD! Polygamy BAD!

No reasons given. That's the way it is because polygamy is a "non issue"! And it's a fish! And my favorite- "it's not an equal rights issue, it just isn't"

What a bunch of hypocrites!
ANON

Fresno, CA

#173925 Jan 8, 2013
:)

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#173926 Jan 9, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah? "Let there be light".
Light, day and night before the sun was created in Gen 1:16.
It's clear they didn't know that day and night were caused by the rotation of section of the earth towards and away form the sun. It also seems they believed the moon produced its own light, and it's clear they believed the earth was flat, and the heavens were solid.
1. So between day two and day four they DID learn that the sun governed the day and the moon the night?

2. Except the Bible never calls the earth flat, it calls it a circle. Maybe you are confusing a mistaken interpretation with what the Bible actually says...?

3. Ever hear of dark matter?

Snicker.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#173927 Jan 9, 2013
Mikey DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
I find it difficult to see the logic of defending monogamous marriage as the historic norm when the laws of many states have already departed from the principle that it is heterosexual, monogamous marriage that is essential to social stability.
Put bluntly, if heterosexuality is no longer legally, morally or socially relevant to marriage, why should monogamy continue to be so important?
Excellent point.

Sociologists believe that the binding purpose of marriage is binding a father and mother together for the benefit of the child.

No fault divorce has already fractured that bind with devastating results.

To further separate procreation from marriage is to complete the lack of necessity for marriage.

Add to that the claim that a father or mother can be removed from the family without effect and the destruction is complete.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#173928 Jan 9, 2013
How is marriage in the absence of family good for the community? Why?

And why privilege such a relationship between two people? Why not two best friends? An employer and his favorite employee? A farmer and his dog?

The social good of marriage, as it has been traditionally understood, has always been rooted, among other things, in its role in the continuance of the human race–i.e., procreation and children. If we excise procreation from the stated civic purposes of marriage–as we are increasingly doing–then what’s the point? It’s just a random, arbitrary relationship that we’ve defined that we somehow think is good for the community. But why?

And what interest does the community have in protecting and subsidizing a sterile relationship between two people “in love”(ostensibly…or not)?
Black momma

Temecula, CA

#173929 Jan 9, 2013
To be honest I wouldn't jump for joy if one of my kids were gay but I would love and support them no matter what I know it would be a open bar during the ceremony. What have notice over the years living from Compton to Lakewood my family pretty much had money. White folks realy care about what people do behind there own close doors and what people think about them I know I am married one. If they want to get married so what. People are so afraid of everyone might invade there picture perfect lives let me tell you something let's start out the year of not judging
Big D

Modesto, CA

#173931 Jan 9, 2013
Black momma wrote:
To be honest I wouldn't jump for joy if one of my kids were gay but I would love and support them no matter what I know it would be a open bar during the ceremony. What have notice over the years living from Compton to Lakewood my family pretty much had money. White folks realy care about what people do behind there own close doors and what people think about them I know I am married one. If they want to get married so what. People are so afraid of everyone might invade there picture perfect lives let me tell you something let's start out the year of not judging
Well don’t lump us all together, I am white, straight, with 4 children that happen to be straight, and I support Gay Marriage, as does my wife and all of my children and their spouses.
Mikey DiRucci

Hayward, CA

#173932 Jan 9, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
You really want to bring into yet another topic your fabulous and glorious impeachment obsession into another thread....
Ok folks, be advised, the one that keeps harping on the subject is now infecting yet another topic with his endless and mindless obsession.
I will no longer be reading any of Liar Mikes posts on this subject just sending my automatic reply
Liar Mike, who lied that I said he was not impeached, who lied when he said I changed what I have been saying, and who lied when he said I was the one harping on this subject that he keeps bringing back up. Who has not been able to find a single post where I said he wasn’t impeached, or that I was saying something different than I am saying now.
Clinton was impeached
After being impeached by the house the impeachment ultimately failed when Clinton was acquitted in the Senate and there were no consequences applied that were written into the impeachment.
YUK!YUK!YUK! "Liar Mike"! You mad bro'?

Liar liar pants on fire!

What a jackass!

P.S. Clinton was impeached. It didn't fail. You were wrong. And that's no lie!
Big D

Modesto, CA

#173933 Jan 9, 2013
Mikey DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
YUK!YUK!YUK! "Liar Mike"! You mad bro'?
Liar liar pants on fire!
What a jackass!
P.S. Clinton was impeached. It didn't fail. You were wrong. And that's no lie!
Liar Mike, who lied that I said he was not impeached, who lied when he said I changed what I have been saying, and who lied when he said I was the one harping on this subject that he keeps bringing back up. Who has not been able to find a single post where I said he wasn’t impeached, or that I was saying something different than I am saying now.
Clinton was impeached
After being impeached by the house the impeachment ultimately failed when Clinton was acquitted in the Senate and there were no consequences applied that were written into the impeachment.
Raids

West Covina, CA

#173934 Jan 9, 2013
Cocktaches are liked better then the entire Glendora, California city council.
Raids

West Covina, CA

#173935 Jan 9, 2013
Cockroaches are liked better then the entire Glendora, California city council.
Mikey DiRucci

Hayward, CA

#173936 Jan 9, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
Liar Mike, who lied that I said he was not impeached, who lied when he said I changed what I have been saying, and who lied when he said I was the one harping on this subject that he keeps bringing back up. Who has not been able to find a single post where I said he wasn’t impeached, or that I was saying something different than I am saying now.
Clinton was impeached
After being impeached by the house the impeachment ultimately failed when Clinton was acquitted in the Senate and there were no consequences applied that were written into the impeachment.
Liar liar pants on fire!

HAR!HAR!HAR!

You mad bro?
Jane Dodo

West New York, NJ

#173937 Jan 9, 2013
KiMare wrote:
How is marriage in the absence of family good for the community? Why?
And why privilege such a relationship between two people? Why not two best friends? An employer and his favorite employee? A farmer and his dog?
Oh dear god! You are SUCH a tired-ass drama queen.
Jane Dodo

West New York, NJ

#173938 Jan 9, 2013
Mikey DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
I find it difficult to see the logic of defending monogamous marriage as the historic norm when the laws of many states have already departed from the principle that it is heterosexual, monogamous marriage that is essential to social stability.
Put bluntly, if heterosexuality is no longer legally, morally or socially relevant to marriage, why should monogamy continue to be so important?
So heterosexuals aren't getting married anymore? If you had two brain cells to rub together...... you'd still be empty headed. And why would you be interested in monogamy and polygamy at the same time? Because you are just a provocateur.
Jane Dodo

West New York, NJ

#173939 Jan 9, 2013
KiMare wrote:
And what interest does the community have in protecting and subsidizing a sterile relationship between two people “in love”(ostensibly…or not)?
Marriage brings stability, or do you wish to argue that fact, too?
Mikey DiRucci

Hayward, CA

#173940 Jan 9, 2013
Jane Dodo wrote:
<quoted text>So heterosexuals aren't getting married anymore? If you had two brain cells to rub together...... you'd still be empty headed. And why would you be interested in monogamy and polygamy at the same time? Because you are just a provocateur.
I'm interested in equality. Sorry if you don't like equality for everyone, but that's kinda what it means.

Please improve your dopey ad hominem! Please! You can do much better. I've seen a spark of a sense of humor sometimes under all that NPD and anger.

WOO HOOO! Mona Lott!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

South Pasadena Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Hundreds March In Anaheim, Demand Arrest Of LAP... 5 hr Anaheim livin 16
Surviving doomsday: Underground condos bring we... 7 hr Learnings 18
News Council rejects Kare offer (Sep '08) 10 hr Escaped 304
Trump is putting the News media in their place! 12 hr Rise above it 8
News Heroin Highway - Map of heroin traffic in Santa... (May '10) 16 hr Lucy21 37
News Firefighters won't be disciplined for porn shoots (Oct '11) 23 hr actorvet 29
News Realtors object to proposed business tax (Aug '10) Sat Montgomery Loser 51

South Pasadena Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

South Pasadena Mortgages