Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

[akpilot]

Rose_NoHo wrote:

<quoted text>
Take notes this time, stupid.
Two words:
Equal rights.
You can't argue against that, so you'll just call me names.
Now, if only I were this good at predicting lottery numbers.:)

Exactly what name did I call you in this post?

Funny how Rose does everything in her post which she accuses others of doing.
How about you present an actual argument Rose and stop trying to be funny. You aren't any better at that than you are at sounding intelligent.

[Big D]

R Hudson wrote:

<quoted text>
And I believe that you haven't read the Constitution, else, you'd know that the Federal Government hasn't the authority to "legalize" it, as the Constitution leaves it up to the states to decide the issue.

Actually the case before the court can indeed affect measures nationwide. It can overturn bans on it in all states. I didnt say it will, I said it can, depends on how it is worded.

[Mike DiRucci]

Big D wrote:

<quoted text>
Actually the case before the court can indeed affect measures nationwide. It can overturn bans on it in all states. I didnt say it will, I said it can, depends on how it is worded.

Yes. Similar to when Bill Clinton was impeached on Dec 19, 1998.

[Mike DiRucci]

Rose_NoHo wrote:

<quoted text>
Know what I'd do if I owned you? Just let you starve to death. You wouldn't be worth what it would cost to feed you, you are just too damn ugly and stupid.

Nice!

I shudder to think of the horror if you were in charge of anyone.

[Mike DiRucci]

I guess that "Big D" jackass finally accepts the fact that Clinton was impeached. He hasn't brought it up again today thank goodness.

[Mike DiRucci]

Big D wrote:

<quoted text>
Actually the case before the court can indeed affect measures nationwide. It can overturn bans on it in all states. I didnt say it will, I said it can, depends on how it is worded.

Boy we're sure glad you got off that obsessive "Clinton's impeachment failed" psycho jag you were on!

We thank you for staying on topic today.

[Lililth_Satans_B ore]

R Hudson wrote:

<quoted text>
It certainly isn't a question of genitalia. It is because homosexual marriage is banned for either gender, thus making it a non-gender issue.
And, since it is a non-gender issue, that is, truly, a display of your equal rights at work...
Just thought I'd put it all together for you, as you might miss the first post, addled as you are....

you really hae a boring fluckin loser life don't you.... at nite do you ever just look in he mirror and say wow... i'm a loser.... i mean really you drive a truck and sit on the computer and obsess about gay peoples lives.... ya your a real catch for any woman... not!!!!!!!!!!

[Lililth_Satans_B ore]

R Hudson wrote:

Chongo, who I look eagerly upon, with the thoughts a pitbull might have, eyeballing a pillow. Come on, Chongles, no word generators for me ? No pre-established mantra for me ?
Oops, clumsy of me to knock over your applecart. Damn it......LOL. I guess it had to end, though, Chongo must have run out of steam.....again.

Gee Mom ... meet my new boyfriend R hudson... he spends his life driving a dirty old truck, smoking cigarates, and hour upon hour on gay topix obssesing about gay civil rights.... ya i wanna marry him.... NOT!!!!!!!!!!

hope you love yo hand loser

[Lililth_Satans_B ore]

R Hudson wrote:

<quoted text>
1) No.
2) No.
3) So ?
4) So?
5) No.
6) Yes.
Any other misspelled questions ?

sorry 99% of the females in this country look at you as ... well ... you know.... a loser

[Lililth_Satans_B ore]

R Hudson wrote:

Good night, kids.
Things to do, people to please, pets to stroke, etc.

you mean a pe nis to stroke lolol

[Big D]

Mike DiRucci wrote:

<quoted text>
Boy we're sure glad you got off that obsessive "Clinton's impeachment failed" psycho jag you were on!
We thank you for staying on topic today.

4 Replies to the same post, trying desperately to change the subject to something you lost before

Nice to see I have such an obsessed fan, I must be all you think about

[Mike DiRucci]

Lililth_Satans_Bore wrote:

<quoted text>sorry 99% of the females in this country look at you as ... well ... you know.... a loser

What, you took a poll? Or did you just make that up? Come on, don't fib to us toots! You're bad at it.

Big fibber!

Fun!

[Mike DiRucci]

Big D wrote:

<quoted text>
4 Replies to the same post, trying desperately to change the subject to something you lost before
Nice to see I have such an obsessed fan, I must be all you think about

Oh no! Not another day of your obsessive "Clinton's impeachment failed" nonsense! Do you ever give up? Clinton's impeachment did not "fail in the Senate" or anywhere else. You're wrong.

Bill Clinton, our 42nd president, was impeached on Dec 19, 1998.

Sorry you don't like it, I don't either but it happened.

What a dope!

[Bruno]

NorCal Native wrote:

<quoted text>
You know why Dumbazz!!!

No, I don't you Dumbazz tell me !!!

[Mike DiRucci]

Bruno wrote:

<quoted text>
No, I don't you Dumbazz tell me !!!

I don't know either what's the old chowder slurping malcontent whining about now?

[Bruno]

SpinnersOut wrote:

Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer's antipathy toward the Obama's administration is evident: She can take that wagging finger and sit on it and spin.
She is a has been, dried up OLD HAG.
Most of the Tea Party haggs are like Janet Brewer anyway.
There a few haggs in Glendora, California too!

Jan Brewer is the only TRUE American Politician left in this country. She is NOT afraid to stand up for the American people who believe in a moral and traditional marriage. You can sit on your boyfriends dick and spin on it yourself !!!

[Bruno]

Jazybird58 wrote:

<quoted text>Well sugar nipples, I could give two shiets if three men want to get married, three women or any other combination. You see asshat someones marriage has zero affect on my marriage. Now there are problems when it comes to the dissalution of a marriage that has more than two people of any sex or combination of sexes. Other than that shiet for brains, no problem.
PS your number is 0, same as your IQ. But hey charge on moron, keep beating your chest and screaming look at me.

Another Typical Gay answer

[A Thought]

R Hudson wrote:

<quoted text>
And, since it is a non-gender issue, that is, truly, a display of your equal rights at work...

I support gay marriage... That said, please help me understand your stance that is it not a gender issue.

Isn't it a matter of allowing people of the same gender to marry?

[Bruno]

R Hudson wrote:

<quoted text>
Haven't you figured it out, yet, cupcake ? I'm never wrong. But, as usual, you are an imbecile...Whether, or not, you are ACLU-Tom...

Hmm there was another queer in here that used "Cupcake" a lot too !!!

[Bruno]

Anonymous wrote:

California gay couples hoped Supreme Court would avoid same-sex marriage case - The stakes are now higher, the wait is longer, and there is no certainty gay rights advocates will win.
http://ca.news.yahoo.com/california-gay-coupl...

So true, if SSM is such a good idea it would have been a done deal, BUT IT'S NOT !