UCLA FOOTBALL NOTEBOOK: Neuheisel say...

UCLA FOOTBALL NOTEBOOK: Neuheisel says Prince will remain No. 1 QB

There are 33722 comments on the Whittier Daily News story from Sep 13, 2010, titled UCLA FOOTBALL NOTEBOOK: Neuheisel says Prince will remain No. 1 QB. In it, Whittier Daily News reports that:

One day after telling reporters on a conference call that he planned to put the quarterback position back up for grabs, UCLA coach Rick Neuheisel said sophomore Kevin Prince will start against Houston on Saturday at the Rose Bowl.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Whittier Daily News.

Bruin For Life

Van Nuys, CA

#18566 Mar 4, 2013
http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootball/blog... USC could be looking at a 4-8 record next year and perhaps win only 2 pac-12 games.
Artie Manhattan

North Hollywood, CA

#18567 Mar 4, 2013
Bruin For Life wrote:
http://www.cbssports.com/colle gefootball/blog/eye-on-college -football/21792210/four-player s-no-longer-part-of-usc-progra m USC could be looking at a 4-8 record next year and perhaps win only 2 pac-12 games.
Ya I hope not then it would hurt the feelings of that hunk Trojan....Go Bruins!

“USC=Greatest team of BCS era!”

Since: Aug 08

Burn, baby, burn!

#18568 Mar 4, 2013
Bruin For Life wrote:
<quoted text>I'm not sidestepping anything...I got my degree from a Cal State school and you got yours from a prestigious private university, congratulations!! I really do mean that. I honestly didn't have the grades, or the money to attend UCLA or USC...I played year-round sports all four years and tried to have my grades just hight enough to qualify academically. I share the same position in my company in my company with UCLA and USC graduates, I make more money than some, and less than some, depending on seniority, and I find that some of these guys/gals are still paying for their student loans, especially those from USC, while the Cal State guys are debt free, thus bringing more income to their households. What I do find hilarious is that some of the USC grads think they should have preferential treatment and refuse to get their hands dirty, and act like we owe them, and they are pompour arrogant a$$holes and think they are entitled to earn more, yet they don't perform as well.
Then write that, and not personal insults hurled in my direction. You question my intelligence, make claims about my personal history that you obviously know nothing about, and I'm going to challenge you back. You say I couldn't get into UCLA and therefore I'm dumb and bitter, yet you admit here that you couldn't get into UCLA. So what does that make you?

p.s. UCLA was just 1 of 5 universities that granted me admission. Their financial aid package was not as generous as USC's, and I would have graduated with more debt had I gone there. Again, you should really not comment on things you obviously know nothing about. Otherwise, you end up looking like a fool.
Artie Manhattan

North Hollywood, CA

#18569 Mar 4, 2013
CPEM wrote:
<quoted text>
Then write that, and not personal insults hurled in my direction. You question my intelligence, make claims about my personal history that you obviously know nothing about, and I'm going to challenge you back. You say I couldn't get into UCLA and therefore I'm dumb and bitter, yet you admit here that you couldn't get into UCLA. So what does that make you?
p.s. UCLA was just 1 of 5 universities that granted me admission. Their financial aid package was not as generous as USC's, and I would have graduated with more debt had I gone there. Again, you should really not comment on things you obviously know nothing about. Otherwise, you end up looking like a fool.
Ya I agree
Bruin For Life

Long Beach, CA

#18570 Mar 4, 2013
CPEM wrote:
<quoted text>
Then write that, and not personal insults hurled in my direction. You question my intelligence, make claims about my personal history that you obviously know nothing about, and I'm going to challenge you back. You say I couldn't get into UCLA and therefore I'm dumb and bitter, yet you admit here that you couldn't get into UCLA. So what does that make you?
p.s. UCLA was just 1 of 5 universities that granted me admission. Their financial aid package was not as generous as USC's, and I would have graduated with more debt had I gone there. Again, you should really not comment on things you obviously know nothing about. Otherwise, you end up looking like a fool.
I have never questioned you intelligence, nor have I ever claimed to be smarter than you...what I do question however is your claim to have been admitted to UCLA, yet you chose USC, being twice the tuition, regardless of the financial aid package...unless you had a 4.0 minumum GPA or admitted by "Affirmative Action" it's hard to belive your claim, unless you can prove it, no, I don't believe. Sorry, it doesn't mean you're not intelligent, it just means not UCLA smart.
Inland emperor Trojan

Fontana, CA

#18571 Mar 4, 2013
Bruin Nation wrote:
<quoted text>
Your effing crazy ever heard of Cal. Bears 20 & 9?
Won 7 in a row and 9 0f last 10
3 ranked teams?
maybe this will help Sparky
Thu, Jan 31 Oregon St. W 71-68
Sat, Feb 2 (10) Oregon W 58-54
Thu, Feb 7 at Arizona St. L 62-66
Sun, Feb 10 at (7) Arizona W 77-69
Thu, Feb 14 UCLA W 76-63
Sun, Feb 17 USC W 76-68
Thu, Feb 21 at (23) Oregon W 48-46
Sat, Feb 23 at Oregon St. W 60-59
Thu, Feb 28 Utah W 64-46
Sat, Mar 2 Colorado W 62-46
Your Clueless
Clueless ??, No , read what I said dummmy , I said most improved - they were total dog shit before , Cal is playing great,but they have always been pretty good.
Trojan

San Francisco, CA

#18573 Mar 4, 2013
Bruin For Life wrote:
<quoted text>I have never questioned you intelligence, nor have I ever claimed to be smarter than you...what I do question however is your claim to have been admitted to UCLA, yet you chose USC, being twice the tuition, regardless of the financial aid package...unless you had a 4.0 minumum GPA or admitted by "Affirmative Action" it's hard to belive your claim, unless you can prove it, no, I don't believe. Sorry, it doesn't mean you're not intelligent, it just means not UCLA smart.
As I've stated at least a dozen times, which school is better depends on what your major is!!!!!

It is not as simple as, "You got admitted to UCLA? Well, you should go there."

Regardless of the financial aid package?! That's hilarious!! As usual, thanks for the laugh!!
Bruin For Life

South Gate, CA

#18574 Mar 4, 2013
Inland emperor Trojan wrote:
<quoted text>Oh ya right , I forgot about that monkey hang - I think the ref was to busy looking for a banana to throw him ,to call a foul!, lmao
little racist, eh?
Pappi Chulo

North Hollywood, CA

#18575 Mar 4, 2013
Bruin For Life wrote:
<quoted text>little racist, eh?
mi hijo también le gusta nazi mayates, por favor no la llames racista

“UCLA Bruin Voice Of Reason!”

Since: Jun 11

West Hollywood, CA

#18576 Mar 4, 2013
Bruin For Life wrote:
<quoted text>no moron the only reason you beat them is because they weren't even thinking about USC and were looking past you.
Please Lifer, let's not talk about looking past teams :/

We are still trying to get over that Cal Poly thing :(

Go Bruins, not looking past anyone except to our own past, many years ago when we actually won titles!

“UCLA Bruin Voice Of Reason!”

Since: Jun 11

West Hollywood, CA

#18577 Mar 4, 2013
Oh my, Jonathan and I go away for a day, a wonderous drive up the coast in his sky blue beetle convertible, and look at all this forum activity.:)

Looks like some of you weren't getting any "action" this weekend ;)

Go Bruins, though Friday night was enough hot fun to last us for week!

“We OWN L.A. Football”

Since: Nov 10

Westwood

#18578 Mar 4, 2013
Inland emperor Trojan wrote:
<quoted text>Clueless ??, No , read what I said dummmy , I said most improved - they were total dog shit before , Cal is playing great,but they have always been pretty good.
Your the new "spin Doctor" taken over for CT
.
10 games ago
sc was 8 & 11 (42% WIN %)(6 & 4 the last 10) now 14 & 15 at a 48% Win %....increase of 6% over the last 10
.
cal was 11 & 8 (58% win %)(9 & 1 the last 10) now 20 & 9 at 69% win %.... increase of 11% over the last 10
.
so now who's the MOST IMPROVED team ??

“We OWN L.A. Football”

Since: Nov 10

Westwood

#18579 Mar 4, 2013
Bruin For Life wrote:
<quoted text>little racist, eh?
A LITTLE ???

someone just showed their TRUE colors.

“We OWN L.A. Football”

Since: Nov 10

Westwood

#18580 Mar 4, 2013
Inland emperor Trojan wrote:
<quoted text>Clueless ??, No , read what I said dummmy , I said most improved - they were total dog shit before , Cal is playing great,but they have always been pretty good.
BTW 10 games ago in pac 12
.
sc was 3 & 3
cal was 3 & 4
.
now sc 9 & 7
cal 12 & 5

once again most improved team ????

“UCLA Bruin Voice Of Reason!”

Since: Jun 11

West Hollywood, CA

#18582 Mar 4, 2013
Bruin Nation wrote:
<quoted text>
BTW 10 games ago in pac 12
.
sc was 3 & 3
cal was 3 & 4
.
now sc 9 & 7
cal 12 & 5
once again most improved team ????
Nation please, we are going a little overboard with all these non-essential facts. They usually come back to bit us on the fannie :/

You just know someone from the Trojan camp will coldly remind us that all Oregon has to do is beat Colorado and Utah and THEY are the Pacific 12 Champions, not our Bruins :/

Go Bruins, let's try to give Shabazzz a proper send off!
Inland emperor Trojan

Fontana, CA

#18583 Mar 4, 2013
Bruin Nation wrote:
<quoted text>
Your the new "spin Doctor" taken over for CT
.
10 games ago
sc was 8 & 11 (42% WIN %)(6 & 4 the last 10) now 14 & 15 at a 48% Win %....increase of 6% over the last 10
.
cal was 11 & 8 (58% win %)(9 & 1 the last 10) now 20 & 9 at 69% win %.... increase of 11% over the last 10
.
so now who's the MOST IMPROVED team ??
I won't argue with you because I like Cal and they are usually pretty reliable over the years to beat ucla in the conf tourn and if the meet up I think they will beat ucla again, especially if your reasoning is correct...I was basically going off the 24pt drubbing AU gave us and then us beating their ass at Galen , but maybe I'am guilty of spinning it , because as it turns out , Arizona has now proven themselves to be dog-bleep!!
Inland emperor Trojan

Fontana, CA

#18584 Mar 4, 2013
PEE PEE PETE wrote:
<quoted text>Nation please, we are going a little overboard with all these non-essential facts. They usually come back to bit us on the fannie :/
You just know someone from the Trojan camp will coldly remind us that all Oregon has to do is beat Colorado and Utah and THEY are the Pacific 12 Champions, not our Bruins :/
Go Bruins, let's try to give Shabazzz a proper send off!
I think Shabazzzzzzzzzz ought to be sent back off to Vegas as a man hooker!...Its that or play turkey ball-or pro ball in Turkey...how ever you want to say it!

“We OWN L.A. Football”

Since: Nov 10

Westwood

#18585 Mar 4, 2013
Inland emperor Trojan wrote:
<quoted text>I won't argue with you because I like Cal and they are usually pretty reliable over the years to beat ucla in the conf tourn and if the meet up I think they will beat ucla again, especially if your reasoning is correct...I was basically going off the 24pt drubbing AU gave us and then us beating their ass at Galen , but maybe I'am guilty of spinning it , because as it turns out , Arizona has now proven themselves to be dog-bleep!!
No problem I work with a Cal grad so I hear how "HOT" they are right now every Monday, and I agree about the Zona teams, I don't know if the Pac 12 is balanced or bad, we'll see how long any of or teams last in the Tourny.
Good to see the Pac 12 tourny in Vegas, always felt the so cal teams had an advantage at the Staples Center.
Artie Manhattan

North Hollywood, CA

#18586 Mar 4, 2013
Bruin Nation wrote:
<quoted text>
No problem I work with a Cal grad so I hear how "HOT" they are right now every Monday, and I agree about the Zona teams, I don't know if the Pac 12 is balanced or bad, we'll see how long any of or teams last in the Tourny.
Good to see the Pac 12 tourny in Vegas, always felt the so cal teams had an advantage at the Staples Center.
Ya I agree,Ramando is a Cal grad and he does dance on the table next to mine cept this Cavalier takes in more money working out of the back alley :)....Go Bruins!

“UCLA Bruin Voice Of Reason!”

Since: Jun 11

West Hollywood, CA

#18587 Mar 4, 2013
Bruin Nation wrote:
<quoted text>
Good to see the Pac 12 tourny in Vegas, always felt the so cal teams had an advantage at the Staples Center.
Nation please, there you go again jumping on someone else's bandwagon at the expense of our Bruins :/

And for your information, our Bruins seem to NEVER win the Pacific 12 Tournament so I am appalled at your accusation of us having an advantage. If true, our Bruins never took it :(

Go Bruins, once we leave Nevada, what stays in Vegas will probably be the Tournament title!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

South Pasadena Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Many Americans are too drugged-out to work 1 hr Ricardo montobomb 6
News An Azusa neighborhood has become a common groun... (Aug '09) 2 hr Ftt 221
What has Jack done for the city that has a POSI... 2 hr I feel tall 7
Monster Under My Bed LA Pop Art Culture Studio ... 6 hr MAOASREON 8
Monster Under My Bed 6 hr EON 5
News A hot mic, groping charges and sexting: 2016 ha... (Nov '16) 7 hr PrinterBench Tech 35
Review: Otis Spunkmeyer 8 hr OTIS SPUNKMEYER M... 1

South Pasadena Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

South Pasadena Mortgages