Lakers Rumors: Options Are Slim for L...

Lakers Rumors: Options Are Slim for Los Angeles to Trade into 1st Round

There are 82 comments on the bleacherreport.com story from Jun 3, 2013, titled Lakers Rumors: Options Are Slim for Los Angeles to Trade into 1st Round. In it, bleacherreport.com reports that:

According to Sam Amico of Fox Sports Ohio , the Los Angeles Lakers are looking to trade into the first round of the 2013 NBA draft.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at bleacherreport.com.

sammy

Pickering, Canada

#41 Jun 18, 2013
Ginobili wrote:
Calm down, Sammy is just trying to yank your chain, he is harmless, all talk and no action.
That may be true in here but hottie chicks will never agree with you.
sammy

Pickering, Canada

#42 Jun 18, 2013
Bewitched wrote:
<quoted text>
You're twisting it. I knew about the takeover, and everyday it was blasted across the tv, radio and newspapers. I know more about it than wiki reports. Don't twist things.
Why didn't you just say so instead commenting like you didn't know? If you actually read your first comment when I was discussing this with sayin, how the heck would anyone know that you new? Have alook B. Chee this is so unlike you.
sammy

Pickering, Canada

#43 Jun 18, 2013
Knew
sammy

Pickering, Canada

#44 Jun 18, 2013
_Jusayin_ wrote:
<quoted text>
What I've noticed with B is even if it's fact or your own perception/opinion and it differs from hers, she'll blast you when it comes to the Cavs or LBJ with no remorse. Really though, if you're a true Cavs fan or fan of any club, why wouldn't you want to take a couple minutes out and read some history about your franchise?
well generally she's not like that, she caught me off guard. In this case you are so right. She came out annoyed. I mean using the wiki thing to make me look like a moron? What more you want to prove a point. Whether I twisted which is understandable, why so angry over (her made up version) of the Toronto Cavaliers? Who cares it was 3O years ago. I was just explaing names and that scenario came up. Whether she knew it or not I guess the name Cavs caught her eye.
sammy

Pickering, Canada

#45 Jun 18, 2013
_Jusayin_ wrote:
<quoted text>
I DO like the Towers a lot. Sounds bold and imposing. I'd vote for that name. Sure beats the New Orleans Pelicans =/
Towers is ok. After Raptors we were suppose to be bobcats way before Charlotte. Personally I like Huskies.
sammy

Pickering, Canada

#46 Jun 18, 2013
Remember B. Iam out of my mind because a guy 30 ft under wanted to move an undesirable team to Toronto. Makes no diff today either .what's changed?
sammy

Pickering, Canada

#47 Jun 18, 2013
Showtime wrote:
<quoted text> LOL you couldn't let it go, you know I said it to tease you, I really don't know what you guys are really talking about, but I said it cause you always like to throw little jabs at me that provoke some debate or something, its not a big deal, so don't get all defensive now and on your high horse when you do the same shit. I should have known your hot head couldn't take a tease lol.
[email protected] head. Far from. You don't know what we are talking about? Sorry I cannot explain further but I don't want to say the wrong things about the Cavs.
sammy

Pickering, Canada

#48 Jun 18, 2013
[email protected] I am killing myself with your comments. That was great.
Showtime

San Gabriel, CA

#49 Jun 18, 2013
sammy wrote:
<quoted text>hahahaha that's why I did it. Lol show. Ok I was having a bad day.
LOL its ok I think we have all snapped at each other at least once, I cant think of anyone who hasn't snapped lol, although you and I probalby hold the record for most snaps.
Showtime

San Gabriel, CA

#50 Jun 18, 2013
sammy wrote:
<quoted text> [email protected] head. Far from. You don't know what we are talking about? Sorry I cannot explain further but I don't want to say the wrong things about the Cavs.
I mean I have an idea of what it was, in all honesty I think we both say provoking things weather we mean to or not, anyway see you back at the old thread.

“All for 1, 1 for all”

Since: Apr 08

Akron, Ohio

#51 Jun 18, 2013
sammy wrote:
<quoted text> Why didn't you just say so instead commenting like you didn't know? If you actually read your first comment when I was discussing this with sayin, how the heck would anyone know that you new? Have alook B. Chee this is so unlike you.
Well, where is the post I made saying "I don't need to read it because I lived it?"
sammy

Pickering, Canada

#52 Jun 18, 2013
Showtime wrote:
<quoted text>I mean I have an idea of what it was, in all honesty I think we both say provoking things weather we mean to or not, anyway see you back at the old thread.
. Been a lot of years. Iam sure we have an understanding
sammy

Pickering, Canada

#53 Jun 18, 2013
Bewitched wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, where is the post I made saying "I don't need to read it because I lived it?"
I can show you a post where you claim I lost my mind that a team would never be named Toronto Cavaliers. In fact that name never entered the equation.

“All for 1, 1 for all”

Since: Apr 08

Akron, Ohio

#54 Jun 18, 2013
sammy wrote:
<quoted text> I can show you a post where you claim I lost my mind that a team would never be named Toronto Cavaliers. In fact that name never entered the equation.
I've read all the posts, but there is one missing. It would have been my first comment to your post about "a takeover." Where is my post? It was a simple response. You have made something out of nothing here. It was right before Show's response.

“All for 1, 1 for all”

Since: Apr 08

Akron, Ohio

#55 Jun 18, 2013
It would have been between #13 and #14.

“Timshel”

Since: Jan 12

Tulsa, OK

#56 Jun 19, 2013
Bewitched wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you out of your mind? The Cavs franchise started up in 1970 in Cleveland. Why WOULD CLE give up their name in '83 to a takeover? CLE didn't give up the Browns name. CLE teams names stay in CLE. Toronto Cavaliers? lmao
^

There you go.

I'll always try and give another the benefit of the doubt especially when it's on a forum because it's difficult to gauge tone and sarcasm etc. but with you B, this seems to be a pattern. If you're really a biased a-hole about your Cavs just own it. I'll respect you more for it but don't try AGAIN to play the victim after you've committed the crime.

“Timshel”

Since: Jan 12

Tulsa, OK

#57 Jun 19, 2013
sammy wrote:
<quoted text> well generally she's not like that, she caught me off guard. In this case you are so right. She came out annoyed. I mean using the wiki thing to make me look like a moron? What more you want to prove a point. Whether I twisted which is understandable, why so angry over (her made up version) of the Toronto Cavaliers? Who cares it was 3O years ago. I was just explaing names and that scenario came up. Whether she knew it or not I guess the name Cavs caught her eye.
From my perspective you didn't twist anything and you said nothing offensive at all. I accused her of twisting my words when she came out and blasted me when I said LBJ's future was made before he joined the NBA. Why lose it over that statement?

Hopefully she'll realize she's offending the decent people on these forums and chill out...

“Timshel”

Since: Jan 12

Tulsa, OK

#58 Jun 19, 2013
sammy wrote:
<quoted text> Towers is ok. After Raptors we were suppose to be bobcats way before Charlotte. Personally I like Huskies.
I could dig Huskies too. Towers seems a lot less used and a bit more original but I am also not from Toronto.

“All for 1, 1 for all”

Since: Apr 08

Akron, Ohio

#59 Jun 19, 2013
sammy wrote:
<quoted text> Are you implying it never happened? Sorry Ted iss 30ft under to explain. Guess news articles are as phoney as Wiki? Come on now B. If you were not aware of it how well do you really know your Cavs? Yea wiki sure fabricates during a time I was fully aware. Its ok. We have our team you have yours.
Where am I implying that it never happened? Where am I implying that wiki is phoney? Where did I say that I was not aware of the "takeover?" Where did I say wiki fabricates? See, all of this is what I was referring to as twisting it.

“All for 1, 1 for all”

Since: Apr 08

Akron, Ohio

#60 Jun 19, 2013
_Jusayin_ wrote:
<quoted text>
What I've noticed with B is even if it's fact or your own perception/opinion and it differs from hers, she'll blast you when it comes to the Cavs or LBJ with no remorse. Really though, if you're a true Cavs fan or fan of any club, why wouldn't you want to take a couple minutes out and read some history about your franchise?
Well, I've got a perception/opinion about you. I remember you being in an NFL forum, and you pretty much have the same method of attacking people's opinions, and then your sidekick Solution follows you around to be your backup.

I'll speak my opinions, and if you don't like them, and they hurt your little feelings, then don't follow me around.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

South Pasadena Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Activists Led by Al Sharpton Brave Cold, Rain f... 18 min ThomasA 49
News Montebello housing project still on, despite sale 4 hr montebello dork 1
gudbye to costco 4 hr montebello dork 1
Review: Channel 71 Los Angeles (Feb '16) 8 hr TV Producer 174
News Woman escapes stalled car on tracks in Santa Fe... 17 hr Mr Fabu Whal 3
non question pour nous Tue good job trump hater 1
News UCLA FOOTBALL NOTEBOOK: Neuheisel says Prince w... (Sep '10) Tue Trojan 32,714

South Pasadena Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

South Pasadena Mortgages