The Supreme Court appeal

Another day, another lawsuit in Richmond. Although this time it's an appeal. The 40 Gloucester petitioners filed an appeal Wednesday with the Virginia Supreme Court, saying that the $80,000 in sanctions levied against them by Judge Westbrook J. Parker violates the First and Fourteenth amendments to the Constitution.

Full Story
First Prev
of 16
Next Last
Think about it

Williston, VT

#342 Jan 11, 2010
what now wrote:
How many people in Gloucester own over 100 acres, how many own over 300, how many own over 500, how many own over 1000, 2000? How would a house on 1/2 acre, selling for over $400,000.00 effect them? What side of the board protects, the larger land owners? Which side of the board has political connections? How much in taxes would a 1000 acres pay, in York County, VS Gloucester. New Kent, James City? What would it take for the Board to protect, the common man?
Get rid of TA, Ressler, Woodard and Crewe, that's how we protect the common man.

One down three to go.
Think about it

Williston, VT

#343 Jan 11, 2010
Spike wrote:
<quoted text>
Yep. And there you have "THE REAL" Gloucester Mafia.
And how the heck would you know, you don't even live here. According to youself.

And don't say you've got family here. It's obvious your family here is tied to this group, very closely. Because no one other than family and their close friends still supports this group.
what now

Hayes, VA

#345 Jan 11, 2010
what is the average income to the County per acre? What is the ratio between non developed, vs developed. per household, what do the large non-farm land owners pay, as a percentage, of the budget? do you feel we should carry their investment. all of the old Chesapeake timberland been sold to private investors. Is it really still timberland?
Spike

Jackson Center, PA

#346 Jan 11, 2010
Think about it wrote:
<quoted text>
And how the heck would you know, you don't even live here. According to youself.
And don't say you've got family here. It's obvious your family here is tied to this group, very closely. Because no one other than family and their close friends still supports this group.
I don't have to live there, thank God, to see what is going on. Your motives are as transparent as the government you claim to want. Now you have a majority on your board of supervisors who will serve...not the people, but the select few. As far as my family goes, well they are none of your business. I would love to have my sister out of there. My nephews, I will leave to their own devices. I suspect they could handle the likes of you with no problem should the need arise. Very inventive, those two. Oh, just for your own information; I have only ever met one member of the board, and I wasn't impressed much with him in the least.
Think about it

Williston, VT

#348 Jan 11, 2010
Spike wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't have to live there, thank God, to see what is going on. Your motives are as transparent as the government you claim to want. Now you have a majority on your board of supervisors who will serve...not the people, but the select few. As far as my family goes, well they are none of your business. I would love to have my sister out of there. My nephews, I will leave to their own devices. I suspect they could handle the likes of you with no problem should the need arise. Very inventive, those two. Oh, just for your own information; I have only ever met one member of the board, and I wasn't impressed much with him in the least.
The last time we had a board that served the people it was BEFORE Ressler was elected. I've watched the various boards of this county and have never seen someone who was so selfserving as Ressler. She claims to be doing this for a "constituent" but then I've heard her speaking to people in general about her "beliefs" and it's amazing those constituents seem to be pushing the same agenda she has talked about.

And I'll agree with you, I am transparent. I want to get rid of these board members because they have made Gloucester County the laughing stock of the region. I've been at regional meetings and the same question is always, "What is that crazy board going to do next." Yep, that's the perception.
Think about it

Williston, VT

#349 Jan 11, 2010
what now wrote:
what is the average income to the County per acre? What is the ratio between non developed, vs developed. per household, what do the large non-farm land owners pay, as a percentage, of the budget? do you feel we should carry their investment. all of the old Chesapeake timberland been sold to private investors. Is it really still timberland?
None of what you say is relevent. If you wish to know that information, look it up. Ask the Commissioner of Revenue.

But I do know one thing. Gloucester is approximately 88% timberland. That's right. I was shocked to hear it, but according to the planning department, it is.
what now

Hayes, VA

#350 Jan 11, 2010
Think about it wrote:
<quoted text>
None of what you say is relevent. If you wish to know that information, look it up. Ask the Commissioner of Revenue.
But I do know one thing. Gloucester is approximately 88% timberland. That's right. I was shocked to hear it, but according to the planning department, it is.
all of the old timber land has been bought by private investors, John Hancock insurance bought all of the old Chesapeake land, but has sod all of it's holdings in Gloucester. They still own most of New Kent, and a large part of Mathews. Investors looking for future development, Yet the County Taxes it as timberland.
what now

Hayes, VA

#351 Jan 11, 2010
Think about it wrote:
<quoted text>
None of what you say is relevent. If you wish to know that information, look it up. Ask the Commissioner of Revenue.
But I do know one thing. Gloucester is approximately 88% timberland. That's right. I was shocked to hear it, but according to the planning department, it is.
your the one that claims to know, which side of the board has your best interests. Do you?
Moe rons post from hayes

Hayes, VA

#352 Jan 11, 2010
Think about it wrote:
<quoted text>
The last time we had a board that served the people it was BEFORE Ressler was elected. I've watched the various boards of this county and have never seen someone who was so selfserving as Ressler. She claims to be doing this for a "constituent" but then I've heard her speaking to people in general about her "beliefs" and it's amazing those constituents seem to be pushing the same agenda she has talked about.
And I'll agree with you, I am transparent. I want to get rid of these board members because they have made Gloucester County the laughing stock of the region. I've been at regional meetings and the same question is always, "What is that crazy board going to do next." Yep, that's the perception.
Wasn't the board that made Gloucester the laughing stock, it was that gay newspaper and their lying reporter.
what now

AOL

#353 Jan 12, 2010
Moe rons post from hayes wrote:
<quoted text>Wasn't the board that made Gloucester the laughing stock, it was that gay newspaper and their lying reporter.
I thought it was Hicks, and his band of 40
Far Side Dog

Chase City, VA

#354 Jan 12, 2010
No, it was the Foul 4 and their nasty, vengeful, foaming at the mouth AND embarrassing entrance into power. Do you have short memory or are you just trying to rewrite history?
right now

Virginia Beach, VA

#355 Jan 12, 2010
what now wrote:
<quoted text>I thought it was Hicks, and his band of 40
They were contributors, but if the reporter had written the truth, and if the editor had allowed it to be printed, then Hicks wouldn't have been rooked into it, and the petitioners blindsided.
what now

Gloucester, VA

#356 Jan 12, 2010
Far Side Dog wrote:
No, it was the Foul 4 and their nasty, vengeful, foaming at the mouth AND embarrassing entrance into power. Do you have short memory or are you just trying to rewrite history?
Similar to the own we just had last week, the foaming at the mouth, works but ways, so I guess it's been proven, to be the sam ole same ole.
moe rons post from hayes

Virginia Beach, VA

#358 Jan 12, 2010
just mo moe rons.
Eternal Victim

United States

#359 Jan 12, 2010
what now wrote:
<quoted text>Similar to the own we just had last week, the foaming at the mouth, works but ways, so I guess it's been proven, to be the sam ole same ole.
No comparison.
I Wonder

Hayes, VA

#360 Jan 12, 2010
Are we allowed to publish on here what we find out under a FOIA, Matt does it, that make it right, right
Moe rons post from hayes

Hayes, VA

#361 Jan 12, 2010
same old same old....

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 16
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

South Hill Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Sabrina Humple (Feb '14) Dec 6 Tommi Bower 2
s&s bbq (Sep '11) Nov 19 bulk 5
What do you need to get a carfax report? (Dec '13) Nov '14 Caren 3
How to cancel my free lotto account? (Nov '13) Oct '14 Josh Bourque 3
Place to rent Oct '14 keshia 1
Debate: Obama-Marriage - Bracey, VA (May '12) Sep '14 CallieFoster210 3
JOIN AJAKAJA BROTHERHOOD FOR WEALTH,FAME,AND PR... (Feb '14) Feb '14 Mr Desmond Salami 1
South Hill Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

South Hill People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

South Hill News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in South Hill

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 9:36 am PST