Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

[Bazooka Joe]

Being stupid and posting stupid racists and threatening comments on this topic doesn't change STUPID, now does it?

Shame on TOPIX for letting this happen in th efirst place, next thing you know it will go down hill like GlendoraPatch.com has already.

[Prof Marvel]

Prof Dingleberry wrote:

<quoted text>

No, people like you used to call them "faggots", "queers", "dykes", and any number of other offensive terms. As for our authority...we WERE gay youths at one time. YOU on the other hand think you have some authority of gay youth why exactly?

Until a litmus test is developed for homosexuality and parents approve of its use on their kids, gay men like you have no business labeling kids "gay youth" -- most especially in the context of runaway youth who can't be protected by their parents.

Labeling a kid homosexual is not part of the school-student agreement. No one has that authority within the school and your unwillingness to grasp this marks you as a dangerous to have around children as I've said before.

Are you a medical doctor? Are you a psychiatrist? Are you even a certified social worker? If the answer to all of the above is, no, please tell us on what authority are you labeling kids "homosexual"?

What makes you think you're qualified to do that?

What makes you think you have the authority to do that?

But please, don't let facts get in the way of you continually misrepresenting a one time event that happened where the principal of the school involved has stated publically that he does not even think one person actually picked up one the handful of booklets ...

How do you know it was only "one time" the booklet was handed out? What's your evidence supporting that claim?

The Little Black Book was a joint effort involving every gay-run organization in the state, including GLESEN, one of the largest gay organizations in the country. We know this because they're all listed in the booklet as sponsors.

You would have us believe this joint effort had no intention of distributing the booklet, that the booklet was going to be put in a museum or buried in a time capsule to be opened in 100 years.

You're playing damage control, not offering anything remotely resembling the truth about this sordid episode.

Worse still, when told the booklet was giving to teenage boys in drop-in centers throughout the state, you swear on a stack of Bibles this didn't happen.

Incidentally, why do you swear on a stack of Bibles this didn't happen if from the other side of your mouth you're telling us the content of the booklet was as wholesome as mom's apple pie?

DUR ...

"Your" kids? Erm, they are our kids to jackass. And we will make sure they are protected as long as we can.

No, they're not "your" kids -- two men can't have kids, remember?

You're in the schools indoctrinating other people's kids.

You were handing the Little Black Book" out to other people's kids.

And even if you adopt kids, these kids have rights. They're not yours to expose to degenerate homosexual practices.

No kid should have been given The Little Black Book even if he was your test tube baby.

Get it through your thick head, stupido -- the Little Black Book is filth.

Bullshit. What they ARE telling, are youth that already know they are gay, that there is nothing wrong with them because of that fact.

No, it's not a "fact" because if it were, you'd be able to tell us what your objective measurement tools are.

Minors should not be labeled "gay youth," it's as simple as that.

Minors were never labeled "gay youth" until same-sex marriage swept the country.

But you people are in the schools and drop-in centers doing that very thing, aren't you? You're telling young boys they're "homosexual" because that's what your "gaydar" tells you.

I suspect it's your libido telling you that, but that's another story.

Stop labeling kids "homosexual!"

You have no authority to do that and if I catch you doing it to my boy, I'll put my foot so far up your queer ass you'll never need your fudge-packed again.

[Bazooka Joe]

Sure been a long and tiring war of words concerning this topic?

[Days Of Futures Past]

Prof Marvel wrote:

<quoted text>
Until a litmus test is developed for homosexuality and parents approve of its use on their kids, gay men like you have no business labeling kids "gay youth" -- most especially in the context of runaway youth who can't be protected by their parents.
Labeling a kid homosexual is not part of the school-student agreement. No one has that authority within the school and your unwillingness to grasp this marks you as a dangerous to have around children as I've said before.
Are you a medical doctor? Are you a psychiatrist? Are you even a certified social worker? If the answer to all of the above is, no, please tell us on what authority are you labeling kids "homosexual"?
What makes you think you're qualified to do that?
What makes you think you have the authority to do that?
<quoted text>
How do you know it was only "one time" the booklet was handed out? What's your evidence supporting that claim?
The Little Black Book was a joint effort involving every gay-run organization in the state, including GLESEN, one of the largest gay organizations in the country. We know this because they're all listed in the booklet as sponsors.
You would have us believe this joint effort had no intention of distributing the booklet, that the booklet was going to be put in a museum or buried in a time capsule to be opened in 100 years.
You're playing damage control, not offering anything remotely resembling the truth about this sordid episode.
Worse still, when told the booklet was giving to teenage boys in drop-in centers throughout the state, you swear on a stack of Bibles this didn't happen.
Incidentally, why do you swear on a stack of Bibles this didn't happen if from the other side of your mouth you're telling us the content of the booklet was as wholesome as mom's apple pie?
DUR ...
<quoted text>
No, they're not "your" kids -- two men can't have kids, remember?
You're in the schools indoctrinating other people's kids.
You were handing the Little Black Book" out to other people's kids.
And even if you adopt kids, these kids have rights. They're not yours to expose to degenerate homosexual practices.
No kid should have been given The Little Black Book even if he was your test tube baby.
Get it through your thick head, stupido -- the Little Black Book is filth.
<quoted text>
No, it's not a "fact" because if it were, you'd be able to tell us what your objective measurement tools are.
Minors should not be labeled "gay youth," it's as simple as that.
Minors were never labeled "gay youth" until same-sex marriage swept the country.
But you people are in the schools and drop-in centers doing that very thing, aren't you? You're telling young boys they're "homosexual" because that's what your "gaydar" tells you.
I suspect it's your libido telling you that, but that's another story.
Stop labeling kids "homosexual!"
You have no authority to do that and if I catch you doing it to my boy, I'll put my foot so far up your queer ass you'll never need your fudge-packed again.

I believe the greater question is,WHO is going to keep you away from your own son to protect him from YOU! And you coward,you aren't going to do anything to anybody or you'll be back in the joint as fast as you can B.J. an under aged tranny! Although it would make your former cell mate a very happy man! Better watch out,that 3rd strike grows ever nearer! LOL

[Brian_G]

Mona Lott wrote:

...Let me ask you this... where the hell did you get the stupid idea that "voting on marriage" is a "key civil right?" I swear, Brian. Sometimes you write things that make you look dumber than a pile of rocks.

I never claimed,'that "voting on marriage" is a "key civil right[]". Democracy gives us the idea we have a right to vote for representatives and referendums. Same sex marriage is antidemocratic; an unelected judge imposed new marriage law on California.

Here's what I wrote:

I wrote Romney has pledged to:

Support sending a federal marriage amendment defining marriage as the union of one man and one woman to the states for ratification.

Nominate to the U.S. Supreme Court and federal bench judges who are committed to restraint and to applying the original meaning of the Constitution, appoint an attorney general similarly committed, and thus reject the idea our Founding Fathers inserted a right to gay marriage into our Constitution

Defend the federal Defense of Marriage Act vigorously in court.

Establish a presidential commission on religious liberty to investigate and document reports of Americans who have been harassed or threatened for exercising key civil rights to organize, to speak, to donate or to vote for marriage and to propose new protections, if needed.

Advance legislation to return to the people of the District of Columbia their right to vote on marriage.

http://www.marriagepledge.com/

[Equal Treatment]

Winston Smith wrote:

<quoted text>
Nope, douche bag, it wasn't mimicry, it was just turning your bullshit question back to you as it applies equally to both of us. You've got no idea what I'm for either. What we can plainly see is that you're a simplistic little imp who believes that everything is black and white in a world full of color. Apparently every gay man to walk the face of the earth, in your little world wears penis hats and wants random sex in bath houses.
Why are you such a bitter little dickhead, Gary?

Thank you but it bears repeating for sure! You've summed it up rather nicely I believe! Great insight into the mind of a con,a hypocrite and first and foremost a LIAR and mentally unbalanced individual!(under statement) LOL

[Brian_G]

RnL2008 wrote:

...Romney is going to have special magic underwear to give him more power than the President actually has!!!

^^^ Anti-Mormon bigot.

[Brian_G]

Reality wrote:

Ryan maybe, not so much Romney, just sayin

President Obama and Vice President Biden both flip flopped on marriage; they both ran on marriage as one man and one woman in 2008. Obama claimed marriage has a sacred aspect.

Romney has always said marriage is one man and one woman. I'm voting for him because he shares my values.

[Bazooka Joe]

How are rosie and the glad handers doing today?

[Prof Marvel]

Winston Smith wrote:

<quoted text>
Nope, douche bag, it wasn't mimicry, it was just turning your bullshit question back to you as it applies equally to both of us. You've got no idea what I'm for either. What we can plainly see is that you're a simplistic little imp who believes that everything is black and white in a world full of color. Apparently every gay man to walk the face of the earth, in your little world wears penis hats and wants random sex in bath houses.
Why are you such a bitter little dickhead, Gary?

They had a whole nation of people like you in Nazi Germany, Winston. Many of them lived right next to the crematoriums. The Nazis told them the smoke and stench belching out of the towers was a new kind of charcoal; the fools believed it... or at least pretended to.

Your story is no mystery: You want something to believe in, something that will make you feel like a hero -- like a revolutionary. Just another misguided idealist, that's all you are. Not quite as bad as terrorist suicide bomber, but just as stupid.

I told you about how the man-boy sex industry has gone through the ceiling since same-sex marriage, but that doesn't deter you, does it? You block it out just like you block out everything that would have you reconsider your slavish support of the LGBT agenda.

The fact that not one gay in this group can debate the agenda without making a complete fool of himself doesn't deter you either.

You're anal retentive like that, Winston -- the way most seriously stupid people are.

The pendulum has swung to the other side.

The Chik-fil-A dust-up showed America has finally got sick and tired of your pals pissing down our backs and calling it rain.

In November your closet queer of a president will be booted out of office and all your homosexual crap will come to a screeching halt.

Enjoy it while you can, fag hag.

[Peach Lipstick]

Two people of the same sex cannot physically have a child but somehow qualify to be parents in the eyes of big govt. At the very least this is intellectual pedophilia and will alter any childs brain in favor of one sex but not the other more so than in a normal parental environment.
It is inconceivable to place any child in a home without the companionship and bonding of a female mother and if big govt had any common sense and did the right thing by doing what I just said that would blow the homosexuals argument for anything right out of the water. It's all about money and votes.
These people are insane.
The Island of Dr Moreau.

[Prof Marvel]

Another thing that's chilling is how the entire non-profit youth industry in Massachusetts has been taken over by gay men.

How did that happen?

Part of the explanation is that a gay man become the State's new Health Department director. It was like "The Night of the Long Knives" -- heteros were kicked out of the Health Department jobs left and right to be replaced by gay males -- most not even remotely qualified.

They took over youth agencies like drop-in centers for runaway boys and thoroughly sexualized them the way gays sexualize everything.

Under the banner of "safe-sex" and "HIV-prevention" they now had deeply personal access to these boys no agencies had had before. They could take them in a private room and ask them all about their sex life -- "Have you ever done it with a boy -- it's alright. We're not judgmental here. We understand that sometimes you want to have sex with boys and men."

They put showers in the drop-in centers and handed fresh towels to the boys after their showers. They helped them dry off. They gave them hot meals and handed them "The Little Black Book" then tested them on its content:

"Ok, Johnny, now tell me what rimming is."

When necessary they found permanent housing for the boys. It's all on their website.
http://www.ccaa.org/housing.html

They found them employment... As male prostitutes -- sure they did. Here's the evidence:
http://www.ccaa.org/pump.html

[Enrico Salvatore Rizzo]

Equal Treatment wrote:

<quoted text>
Thank you but it bears repeating for sure! You've summed it up rather nicely I believe! Great insight into the mind of a con,a hypocrite and first and foremost a LIAR and mentally unbalanced individual!(under statement) LOL

You're pickin' trade up on the street like that. That's nowhere.

[Enrico Salvatore Rizzo]

Days Of Futures Past wrote:

<quoted text>
I believe the greater question is,WHO is going to keep you away from your own son to protect him from YOU! And you coward,you aren't going to do anything to anybody or you'll be back in the joint as fast as you can B.J. an under aged tranny! Although it would make your former cell mate a very happy man! Better watch out,that 3rd strike grows ever nearer! LOL

I mean, you gotta get yourself some kind of management. You need my friend O'Daniel. He operates the biggest stable in town, in fact, in the whole god-damned Metropolitan area. It's stupid a stud like you paying. You don't want to be stupid.

[Bazooka Joe]

Don't be stupid and post racists and threatening comments on this topic.

[Winston Smith]

Prof Marvel wrote:

<quoted text>
They had a whole nation of people like you in Nazi Germany, Winston. Many of them lived right next to the crematoriums. The Nazis told them the smoke and stench belching out of the towers was a new kind of charcoal; the fools believed it... or at least pretended to.
Your story is no mystery: You want something to believe in, something that will make you feel like a hero -- like a revolutionary. Just another misguided idealist, that's all you are. Not quite as bad as terrorist suicide bomber, but just as stupid.
I told you about how the man-boy sex industry has gone through the ceiling since same-sex marriage, but that doesn't deter you, does it? You block it out just like you block out everything that would have you reconsider your slavish support of the LGBT agenda.
The fact that not one gay in this group can debate the agenda without making a complete fool of himself doesn't deter you either.
You're anal retentive like that, Winston -- the way most seriously stupid people are.
The pendulum has swung to the other side.
The Chik-fil-A dust-up showed America has finally got sick and tired of your pals pissing down our backs and calling it rain.
In November your closet queer of a president will be booted out of office and all your homosexual crap will come to a screeching halt.
Enjoy it while you can, fag hag.

Oh joy! Once again we find ourselves confronted with Reductio ad Hitlerum delivered by none other than the forum's very own failed author.

[Prof Marvel]

Winston Smith wrote:

<quoted text>
Oh joy! Once again we find ourselves confronted with Reductio ad Hitlerum delivered by none other than the forum's very own failed author.

Well, Winston, I've given you ample opportunity to explain why a man who claims to be a happily married hetero is more for the gay agenda than any gay person we've seen around here to date.

Rather than explain yourself, you've continued to display your signature foam in the mouth, wild-eye support of everything gay.

There's only one conclusion here: you're a gay guy masquerading as a hetero and that's how I'll treat you going forward -- and recommend everyone else treats you.

Now what were you saying, queer?

[jacques renault]

(a) Winston is gay and (b) it is Winston who is the failed author:

Here is Winston's literary effort:

A POST-MORTEM ON MARRIAGE: THE SHE-MANIFESTO OF WINSTON SMITH

"When I was a pre-homosexual, my family used to take me to Coney Island, where I gazed upon men in tight Speedos and ate foot-long hot dogs. And I like my hot dogs with a lot of relish." It finishes with him describing a "girls night on the town" where he and several well-known homosexuals were portrayed enjoying to "go out at night and hunt down hunky men and rip their shirts off."

[comfortably numb]

jacques renault wrote:

Idiotic rambling

Aren't you the one in a tizzy about a professor wearing bike shorts?

[jacques renault]

comfortably numb wrote:

<quoted text>
Aren't you the one in a tizzy about a professor wearing bike shorts?

his official faculty photo is in a bike shirt; Southern Illinois is a party school, and he looked like the gay Bluto