Is Buzz at "legal risk" ?

Posted in the Soquel Forum

Reality Check

San Jose, CA

#1 Feb 4, 2013
The posts in the "Archive of Incest Posts by Buzz" show that Buzz has posted allegations of incestual conduct against real people in the community.

Those people do have legal avenues they can persue against Buzz, he has broken the law.

http://www.topix.com/forum/city/santa-cruz-ca...
Reality Check

San Francisco, CA

#2 Feb 4, 2013
A bizarre statement for you to post, John, given that you've posted pages of baseless allegations against Buzz. So you're outing yourself as legally culpable? Or you're just a lunatic?
Reality Check

Hidden Valley Lake, CA

#3 Feb 4, 2013
Reality Check wrote:
A bizarre statement for you to post, John, given that you've posted pages of baseless allegations against Buzz. So you're outing yourself as legally culpable? Or you're just a lunatic?
Wrap your head around this, dumbass, I'm not one of the Colbys...
gavel pounder

Santa Cruz, CA

#4 Feb 4, 2013
John, are you so sure you're not at "legal risk" yourself for repeatedly claiming without any credible evidence that your neighbors are "meth cookers" and "SCPD informants"?
Reality Check

United States

#5 Feb 4, 2013
gavel pounder wrote:
John, are you so sure you're not at "legal risk" yourself for repeatedly claiming without any credible evidence that your neighbors are "meth cookers" and "SCPD informants"?
You are hoping that John is just going to drop in on one of these warnings about Buzz and answer this? lol

I'll answer this, though. When John takes action against DBS, it wont be a defense for DBS that John is...well let's say eccentric.

Normally you like to give us links "proving" your points. You dont do that, however, when you've got no proof.

Fancy that, you have provided no proof that John has done anything wrong.

Buzz, on the other hand, has been spreading lie about the Colbys and he has identified where they live.

He's breaking the law, as is DBS.
Marco

San Francisco, CA

#6 Feb 5, 2013
That's a ridiculous double standard of burden of proof you've got there, Reality Check/John Cohen/John Colby/Bob Mitchell, whatever you want to call yourself today.

Are you going to say that this ridiculous allegation wasn't posted by John Colby?
http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2013/02/01/1...
DBS

San Jose, CA

#7 Feb 5, 2013
Reality Check wrote:
<quoted text>
You are hoping that John is just going to drop in on one of these warnings about Buzz and answer this? lol
I'll answer this, though. When John takes action against DBS, it wont be a defense for DBS that John is...well let's say eccentric.
Normally you like to give us links "proving" your points. You dont do that, however, when you've got no proof.
Fancy that, you have provided no proof that John has done anything wrong.
Buzz, on the other hand, has been spreading lie about the Colbys and he has identified where they live.
He's breaking the law, as is DBS.
Except that FAT Pat left out the part where ColbyLOON made all kinds of false allegations himself, AND made his own address public information. Then there's the phone listing in the White pages.

You lose again Lardass!!!

“The buck stops here!”

Since: Sep 12

Scotts Valley

#8 Feb 6, 2013
I would say the definitive answer to the topic of this thread would be NO!

John's demonstrably unhealthy involvement in his sister's life and the total cock-up he's made of his own is well chronicled in the local media. The Colbys made their lives public and ought not now start crying about other people's reactions to the craziness. It's like watching Honey Boo Boo and being able to participate on line.
Fan of Marco

Alviso, CA

#9 Feb 8, 2013
Marco wrote:
That's a ridiculous double standard of burden of proof you've got there, Reality Check/John Cohen/John Colby/Bob Mitchell, whatever you want to call yourself today.
Are you going to say that this ridiculous allegation wasn't posted by John Colby?
http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2013/02/01/1...
Great link! It shows ColbyLoser wailing about SCPD teaching an alleged informant how to cook meth on the informants patio. What made it even funnier was that one of IndyBay's premiere contributors, Razer Ray, sliced and diced Colby's crackpot assertions like a Ginsu knife! Ray gave Colby an ass kicking rarely seen on IndyBay.
Fan of Marco

Alviso, CA

#10 Feb 8, 2013
Too good to not share:

SCPD loves drug dealers
by John E. Colby
Sunday Feb 3rd, 2013 5:28 PM
"Auntie Imperial is right. The police do love drug dealers. From observations at my apartment complex, I believe the Santa Cruz Police Department (SCPD) turned a dangerous methamphetamine abuser/dealer whose illegal activities I reported to them into a narcotics informant cooking methamphetamine.

I watched for several months from my front porch and bedroom window as apparent undercover officers trained this drug dealer to cook methamphetamine in his backyard.

Apparently the SCPD dropped a methamphetamine cooker in the middle of a Section 8 apartment complex unknown to HUD and the rest of the federal government. I believe HUD is very angry about this. It seems that HUD is not taking this lightly.

This is consistent with reports from other Santa Cruz citizens who complain that they can't get the SCPD to remove drug houses from their neighborhoods. One elderly woman reported to me that she was going to sell her house because it was the only way she could escape from the meth house next door.

This alleged collusion between the SCPD and dangerous drug dealers is what Santa Cruz should be marching to the City Council about. The homeless are merely a convenient diversion for alleged SCPD corruption."

Ok but...
by RazerRay
Sunday Feb 3rd, 2013 7:42 PM
"Drug dealers don't WORK for police departments... as you said they most likely mimic capitalist behavior, which means they work for themselves, and as such provide only the most minimal functions as snitch/provocateurs (typically 'dry') for the police.

The police are much more liable to use them as poster children for the 'militarization', dividing and conquering of a given neighborhood or a community. Such as is being pandered to here by the notion that Drug Dealers are in consort with the police against Berekley's CopWatch.

Ever consider the drug dealer who mentioned that little tidbit is the one whose working for the BPD?

Didn't think so.

Also, I still don't believe you have a neighbor 'cooking meth'. Do you KNOW how bad that smells, like ether wash, for literally hundreds of yards away?

That's why the labs are in rural areas... all over the US, and they ARE paranoids. NO ONE SEES their labs. No less out your living room window in an apartment complex.

I think you're totally off topic for this thread and I'm not going to discuss it any further"
DBS

San Jose, CA

#11 Feb 8, 2013
Fan of Marco wrote:
<quoted text>
Great link! It shows ColbyLoser wailing about SCPD teaching an alleged informant how to cook meth on the informants patio. What made it even funnier was that one of IndyBay's premiere contributors, Razer Ray, sliced and diced Colby's crackpot assertions like a Ginsu knife! Ray gave Colby an ass kicking rarely seen on IndyBay.
Gotta love it!!!

To quote the immortal and incomparable Sum Dim;

"Watching these two loonies jousting with Light-Sabers over who is the bigger loon"

"Only on Indycrap"

Something like that.

Priceless!!!
Reality Check

Foster City, CA

#12 Feb 15, 2013
Reality Check wrote:
The posts in the "Archive of Incest Posts by Buzz" show that Buzz has posted allegations of incestual conduct against real people in the community.
Those people do have legal avenues they can persue against Buzz, he has broken the law.
http://www.topix.com/forum/city/santa-cruz-ca...
Buzz is still accusing the Colbys of incest.
Buzz

United States

#13 Feb 15, 2013
[QUOTE who"Unreality Check"]<quoted text>
Buzz is still accusing the Colbys of incest.[/QUOTE]

Well, what do you and fat Pat do up in your welfare ghetto that has the neighbors wanting you evicted? It sure isn't healthy behavior.
Reality Check

San Francisco, CA

#14 Feb 15, 2013
Buzz wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, what do you and fat Pat do up in your welfare ghetto that has the neighbors wanting you evicted? It sure isn't healthy behavior.
This is a lie, Buzz, you are at legal risk:

"What do you call your diddling your big fat sister, John? Your neighbors have complained quite a bit about it, so there is probably something to it. I can easily see why over 30 of your neighbors had signed a position calling for your eviction. You are sure one sick, perverted puppy, John."

http://www.topix.com/forum/city/santa-cruz-ca...

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Soquel Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
New TBSC stalker: Johnny Font 4 min Phyllis 9
Too much, too late, or how to lose a lawsuit 7 min Phyllis 3
John Colby is NOT Paul Mendoza on Indycrap and ... 11 min John Colby 20
Buzz stalks as "John Colby" (May '14) 54 min not John Colby 164
Officer Baker Supporter Lists Topix 'SUPER TROLLS' (Apr '13) 55 min not John Colby 47
The stigmata of being a wannabe in TBSC- 5 hr JOHN STIGMATA 36
Temperatures expected to drop to near freezing ... 12 hr not John Colby 3
Soquel Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Soquel People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Soquel News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Soquel

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 7:59 pm PST