I know someone who was at the public press conference when the women said Baker molested them.<quoted text>
Your point is if someone wasn't charged with a crime they're still guilty, and that is wrong. If you were not around SC at the time that this had supposedly happened, you'd have some clout to spout. Since you were not, and are using something you read on Indybay, as a rumor mind you, not even a direct story about it, you are spreading hearsay. You think I'm trying to cover something up, and I'm asking for your evidence. You have zero evidence. It's like YOU are trying to re-write history. You're fun to play with as a troll, cause you are pathetically inept even holding a conversation about one topic. You dip, you dodge, and you bring up some other random story to back up your claim. I'm interested in when you're going to fold your hand because you don't have the cards, but I believe you'll continue bluffing and acting like you are doing the right thing here on Topix. Fat becky tried the same things you're doing, and failed. Yes, I called her fat. Shall I call her by her initials? BJ. Fat BJ.
I didn't say he was guilty of a crime, but I do think that Baker should have been investigated more thoroughly, and that other people think that him being a pervert affected his job performance.
Read what I say more carefully, troll.
I did say I think he may have been a pervert if so many women actually said that about him, and if he did it on the job and the SCPD didn't investigate it properly, it needs to be made public.
If people let this thread rest I wont keep commenting on it until more time has passed, but people keep trying to refute the obvious facts, and also the trolls are stalking.
Evidently emotions are still strong and people can't come to terms with the facts.