Anybody watch the Benghazi Hearings?

[Limbertwig]

What do you think about Clintons Testimony? I think she was excellent,I hope she runs for President in 2016. She made Senators's Paul,Johnson and McCain look like fools.

[KennyKelly3]

Senators Johnson and Paul were amazing. Secretary Clinton couldn't keep her cool, couldn't hide the lies she was telling well, and she completely backtracked.

Sen. Johnson let her have it, and her response was that those killed do not matter. For being State she is very irresponsible for thinking that. The lives lost do matter, because her own department lays claim it was about a Youtube video. Another lie she tried to cover up. Didn't work.

Sen. Paul did the best work. Not only did he let her know that she is unexcused for her atrocities. He let her know much of leadership she lacked (which will be brought up if she even thinks of running). And the cherry on top will also damage any chance of anyone taking her seriously for anything from president to dog catcher. After Sen. Paul applauded her over taking responsibility for the attack, she backtracked and said it was the fault of lesser agencies. LOL! She took back her own story covering up for the administration.

In all of her testimonies before the House and Senate committees was filled with backtracking, filler, crocodile fits, and more lies. If anyone seriously likes her as a politician, then history and economics lessons are in their futures if they don't want to be ignorant.

[Westwood]

KennyKelly3 wrote:

-
In all of her testimonies before the House and Senate committees was filled with backtracking, filler, crocodile fits, and more lies. If anyone seriously likes her as a politician, then history and economics lessons are in their futures if they don't want to be ignorant.

So what? The majority of people (Libs in power) are still on her side. There are no consequences for her, she's untouchable so people might as well leave her alone.
Don't believe me? Then ask a Lib.

[Limbertwig]

KennyKelly3 wrote:

Senators Johnson and Paul were amazing. Secretary Clinton couldn't keep her cool, couldn't hide the lies she was telling well, and she completely backtracked.
Sen. Johnson let her have it, and her response was that those killed do not matter. For being State she is very irresponsible for thinking that. The lives lost do matter, because her own department lays claim it was about a Youtube video. Another lie she tried to cover up. Didn't work.
Sen. Paul did the best work. Not only did he let her know that she is unexcused for her atrocities. He let her know much of leadership she lacked (which will be brought up if she even thinks of running). And the cherry on top will also damage any chance of anyone taking her seriously for anything from president to dog catcher. After Sen. Paul applauded her over taking responsibility for the attack, she backtracked and said it was the fault of lesser agencies. LOL! She took back her own story covering up for the administration.
In all of her testimonies before the House and Senate committees was filled with backtracking, filler, crocodile fits, and more lies. If anyone seriously likes her as a politician, then history and economics lessons are in their futures if they don't want to be ignorant.

Clinton never said the lives lost didn't matter,your statment is a lie. She said the reasons behind the attack didn't matter. Senator Paul asked if she knew of any arms being transferred to Turkey which had nothing to do with Benghazi,he did a really great job.

[KennyKelly3]

Limbertwig wrote:

<quoted text>Clinton never said the lives lost didn't matter,your statment is a lie. She said the reasons behind the attack didn't matter. Senator Paul asked if she knew of any arms being transferred to Turkey which had nothing to do with Benghazi,he did a really great job.

I saw the hearing. She said it didn't matter. And yes, the REASONS of why a person commits atrocities does matter. If she was a leader at all she would know that. If you don't know the reasons why, then you can't prevent a similar atrocity from happening again. Our entire foreign policy is like this.

And Turkey, like any country we're illegally and irrationally in, is very relevant to Benghazi. They're all connected. Foreign policy and international relations are important subjects to read into if you're interested in this hearing.

Bonus!

Click to reveal

[Limbertwig]

KennyKelly3 wrote:

<quoted text>
I saw the hearing. She said it didn't matter. And yes, the REASONS of why a person commits atrocities does matter. If she was a leader at all she would know that. If you don't know the reasons why, then you can't prevent a similar atrocity from happening again. Our entire foreign policy is like this.
And Turkey, like any country we're illegally and irrationally in, is very relevant to Benghazi. They're all connected. Foreign policy and international relations are important subjects to read into if you're interested in this hearing.

Your lies are easy to disprove,by watching the video. This link will take you to the page,on the right side is a video play list. The top one shows the hearing in its entirety
http://www.c-span.org/Events/Sec-of-State-Cli...

[Limbertwig]

KennyKelly3 wrote:

<quoted text>
I saw the hearing. She said it didn't matter. And yes, the REASONS of why a person commits atrocities does matter. If she was a leader at all she would know that. If you don't know the reasons why, then you can't prevent a similar atrocity from happening again. Our entire foreign policy is like this.
And Turkey, like any country we're illegally and irrationally in, is very relevant to Benghazi. They're all connected. Foreign policy and international relations are important subjects to read into if you're interested in this hearing.

This statement is untrue, you've twisted what she really said.


Sen. Johnson let her have it, and her response was that those killed do not matter. For being State she is very irresponsible for thinking that. The lives lost do matter, because her own department lays claim it was about a Youtube video. Another lie she tried to cover up. Didn't work.

[gomer-ez]

These American people asked for more security days before the attack.Someone in our government should be held accountable for these murders.
We will waste a million dollars for hearings on a baseball player taking drugs,and send that person to jail,But our government can kill innocent citizens .OOOPPPS I'm sorry,it's ok.
Ether Clinton or obama should be on trial for murder.They had satilite feed to that compound.They knew it happened when it happened.
This has been covered up from the start.Which lie do we believe.

[Limbertwig]

gomer-ez wrote:

These American people asked for more security days before the attack.Someone in our government should be held accountable for these murders.
We will waste a million dollars for hearings on a baseball player taking drugs,and send that person to jail,But our government can kill innocent citizens .OOOPPPS I'm sorry,it's ok.
Ether Clinton or obama should be on trial for murder.They had satilite feed to that compound.They knew it happened when it happened.
This has been covered up from the start.Which lie do we believe.

Clintons testimony under oath is there was no satelite feed.

[gomer-ez]

Which lair do you believe?
I guess they did not request extra security.

[Limbertwig]

gomer-ez wrote:

Which lair do you believe?
I guess they did not request extra security.

Watch the video and you tell me.

[gomer-ez]

So is it our new foreign policy? you kill Americans on American soil,and we will give you 16 fighter jets.What a peace token.

[KennyKelly3]

gomer-ez wrote:

So is it our new foreign policy? you kill Americans on American soil,and we will give you 16 fighter jets.What a peace token.

Pretty much. That's been our foreign policy since we first messed with the Middle East so belligerently in 1953 and beyond.

[gomer-ez]

KennyKelly3 wrote:

<quoted text>
Pretty much. That's been our foreign policy since we first messed with the Middle East so belligerently in 1953 and beyond.

I'm sorry I lost my head for a moment.

[gomer-ez]

Limbertwig wrote:

<quoted text>Watch the video and you tell me.

Which video are you referring to,obamas,clintons,or bidens,when this all came about.Three different stories were told.
Which one do we believe?

[gomer-ez]

I would say they threw clinton to the wolves.