Did you vote today?

Created by Rick on Jun 8, 2010

6,176 votes

Click on an option to vote

Yes

No

Other (explain below)

jack

Ashburn, VA

#26206 Aug 5, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
"It was so bad that God decided that there wasn't one single person worth saving."
Nope, you are wrong.
Abraham then inquired of God for mercy at lower numbers (first 45, then 40, then 30, then 20, and finally at 10), with the LORD agreeing each time.[Gen 18:22-33][26] Two of the angels proceeded to Sodom and were met by Abraham's nephew Lot, who convinced the angels to lodge with him, and they ate with Lot.
Would you care to discuss what Lot and his two daughters did after he was spared?
Barney, you asked this question about Lot, after you had been pointing your finger at others, bellowing your judgement about how judgemental everyone else is.
(Does everyone else here see the irony in Barney' s self-proclaimed right to point out all those he deems judgemental, and all the while refusing to see how judgemental he is being? Only in in the mind and world of Barney can this be justified!!)
I, in turn, chose to accept your challenge and discuss the vile act between Lot and his daughters after he was spared, by asking you if you were judging the actions of Lot, and reminding you that in the New Testament, God calls Lot a righteous man whose righteous soul was vexed by all the wrong doing going on around him.
Instead of answering, you divert attention back to your paranoid obsession with changing names and locations...proclaiming your intelligence, and bragging about your clever investigating skills that no one is impressed by!
You are proof positive that those always calling others out on judgemental hypocrisy, are indeed the biggest judgemental hypocrites around!
Your non-stop, ridiculous accusations inevitably lead right back to describing no one but yourself.
It is time for you to realize this because we've all known it for a long time.
Dont Know Nothing

Medford, OR

#26207 Aug 5, 2013
Dont Know Much Either wrote:
<quoted text>
Double negatives are taught early on my planet, so yes, we did understand. Obvious I know much more than you, but then, who doesn't? Maybe Barney.
What? You just contradicted your post name by stating you know more than me when my post name states that I know something and your post name says you don't know much either. You are truly a very confused individual. Maybe that planet should have taught common sense instead of understanding double negatives, then maybe you would have made at least a little sense in your statements.
Dont Know Much Either

Canyon Lake, TX

#26208 Aug 5, 2013
Dont Know Nothing wrote:
<quoted text>What? You just contradicted your post name by stating you know more than me when my post name states that I know something and your post name says you don't know much either. You are truly a very confused individual. Maybe that planet should have taught common sense instead of understanding double negatives, then maybe you would have made at least a little sense in your statements.
"Don't Know Nothing" would equate to "Knows Everything". Nearly everyone knows more than those that they feel they know everything, therefore I will stand on my statement. You might consider your next moniker to be "Not Full of Nothing" since it is obvious that you are full of "It"
she knows how to

Horseshoe Bend, AR

#26209 Aug 5, 2013
Dont Know Nothing wrote:
<quoted text>What? You just contradicted your post name by stating you know more than me when my post name states that I know something and your post name says you don't know much either. You are truly a very confused individual. Maybe that planet should have taught common sense instead of understanding double negatives, then maybe you would have made at least a little sense in your statements.
This ugly bag of wind got run out of Arkansas. She has no skills and that's why she is all for income and wealth redistribution, but she knows how to use the system to get everything possible without having to work.
She is about as far left as you can get with her rabid views as you can tell since she has the IQ boarding 50. She is one of those "useful fools "the communist party loves. Actually she does not know anything except where she can get that welfare check.
Info

Blytheville, AR

#26210 Aug 5, 2013
Vote is to : elect a politician who has a wonderful smile , words of encouragement , good ideas to expound on change, LIES LIES LIES DECEPTION DECEPTION DECEPTION : Our Politicians are corrupt ! the entire bunch is corrupt, anyone you put into office will become corrupt . HOW DARE ANYONE WITH A BRAIN NOT TO SPEAK THIS IS TRUTH !
*****After 40 years of voting i can now say its a bunch of corruptness, lies and deception POLITICIANS WHO SEEK TO FILL THEIR POCKETS. and do . who will stand and speak with mouths full of lies. Our nation if its damned its a result of LAWYERS who lobby to sway the support of politicians to support thier $$$$$$$$greedy self serving needs. IM ONLY ONE OF I PRAY MANY WHO KNOW THIS TRUE
Dont Know Much Either

Jonesboro, AR

#26211 Aug 5, 2013
she knows how to wrote:
<quoted text>This ugly bag of wind got run out of Arkansas. She has no skills and that's why she is all for income and wealth redistribution, but she knows how to use the system to get everything possible without having to work.
She is about as far left as you can get with her rabid views as you can tell since she has the IQ boarding 50. She is one of those "useful fools "the communist party loves. Actually she does not know anything except where she can get that welfare check.
I seldom agree with him/her but they do bring up legitimate concerns. I doubt if they are nearly as bad as you say.

Since: Dec 10

Kansas City Ks.

#26212 Aug 5, 2013
jack wrote:
<quoted text>
Barney, you asked this question about Lot, after you had been pointing your finger at others, bellowing your judgement about how judgemental everyone else is.
(Does everyone else here see the irony in Barney' s self-proclaimed right to point out all those he deems judgemental, and all the while refusing to see how judgemental he is being? Only in in the mind and world of Barney can this be justified!!)
I, in turn, chose to accept your challenge and discuss the vile act between Lot and his daughters after he was spared, by asking you if you were judging the actions of Lot, and reminding you that in the New Testament, God calls Lot a righteous man whose righteous soul was vexed by all the wrong doing going on around him.
Instead of answering, you divert attention back to your paranoid obsession with changing names and locations...proclaiming your intelligence, and bragging about your clever investigating skills that no one is impressed by!
You are proof positive that those always calling others out on judgemental hypocrisy, are indeed the biggest judgemental hypocrites around!
Your non-stop, ridiculous accusations inevitably lead right back to describing no one but yourself.
It is time for you to realize this because we've all known it for a long time.
Missy, you certainly have a propensity for embellishment. Unless one of your monikers are Realty Check, with your panties in such a wad I would not be surprised if it is, what you are speaking of was directed at R.C. and not "everyone else" as you erroneously stated. Could it be you are referring to your multiple monikers as "we".

"Instead of answering, you divert attention back to your paranoid obsession"

Really, was this alleged diversion in Reply to Jack with a IP of San Jose, CA.

Nope, it was not.

Being ignored was more than your fragile ego could stand . Got to you so bad you confess to using multiple screen names with multiple IP's.

So you want to discuss Lot, fine lets do so, and we will start here,

"by asking you if you were judging the actions of Lot"

I suggest you read your post again,

QUOTE: "why you wanna judge Lot so harshly"

And in the same post you ask me,

QUOTE: "you aren't guilty of passing your own judgment on Lot, are you"

I did not make a judgmental remark about Lot but you sure did,

QUOTE: "vile act between Lot and his daughters"

HUMMMMMMMMMM

QUOTE: "in the New Testament, God calls Lot a righteous man"

Wrong again Cupcake, God did not say that, Peter did.(2Peter 2.7)


Why Peter said that is still perplexing to biblical scholars today, and rightly so.

In Genesis 19, Lot is living in Sodom with seemingly little trouble sleeping at night.

Genesis 19.1-The two angels came to Sodom in the evening, and Lot was sitting in the gate of Sodom. When Lot saw them, he rose to meet them and bowed himself with his face to the earth.

Lot sitting at the gate shows that he had some level of influence in the city. He offered his two virgin daughters to the strangers, and you obviously know what happen after that.

Since Abraham saved Lot, and God gave Moab a section of land in Canaan. One of his descendants was Ruth named as one ancestor of the Savior of the world, Jesus Christ..

Do you really think the narrative in the New Testament could refer to him any differently?

harmonygrovestud

Oklahoma City, OK

#26213 Aug 5, 2013
Wtf
have mercy

Conway, AR

#26214 Aug 6, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
Missy, you certainly have a propensity for embellishment. Unless one of your monikers are Realty Check, with your panties in such a wad I would not be surprised if it is, what you are speaking of was directed at R.C. and not "everyone else" as you erroneously stated. Could it be you are referring to your multiple monikers as "we".
"Instead of answering, you divert attention back to your paranoid obsession"
Really, was this alleged diversion in Reply to Jack with a IP of San Jose, CA.
Nope, it was not.
Being ignored was more than your fragile ego could stand . Got to you so bad you confess to using multiple screen names with multiple IP's.
So you want to discuss Lot, fine lets do so, and we will start here,
"by asking you if you were judging the actions of Lot"
I suggest you read your post again,
QUOTE: "why you wanna judge Lot so harshly"
And in the same post you ask me,
QUOTE: "you aren't guilty of passing your own judgment on Lot, are you"
I did not make a judgmental remark about Lot but you sure did,
QUOTE: "vile act between Lot and his daughters"
HUMMMMMMMMMM
QUOTE: "in the New Testament, God calls Lot a righteous man"
Wrong again Cupcake, God did not say that, Peter did.(2Peter 2.7)
Why Peter said that is still perplexing to biblical scholars today, and rightly so.
In Genesis 19, Lot is living in Sodom with seemingly little trouble sleeping at night.
Genesis 19.1-The two angels came to Sodom in the evening, and Lot was sitting in the gate of Sodom. When Lot saw them, he rose to meet them and bowed himself with his face to the earth.
Lot sitting at the gate shows that he had some level of influence in the city. He offered his two virgin daughters to the strangers, and you obviously know what happen after that.
Since Abraham saved Lot, and God gave Moab a section of land in Canaan. One of his descendants was Ruth named as one ancestor of the Savior of the world, Jesus Christ..
Do you really think the narrative in the New Testament could refer to him any differently?
Oh, Barney, grow up! Man up! Don't be a whiney baby!! Have a little pride in yourself! Stop all of these paranoid accusations! My face just flushes and I get all embarrassed for you when I start reading your wild and crazy fantasy island posts! For the last time...
I am hiding nothing! Your awesome detective skills have not caused me to confess anything.
And for the last time, hear me and hear me well...if I could control that silly IP location thing, I would! I live in AR, and I post from my Kindle. I can post one thing from one room and it says I am in VA. I can go to another room in the house, post, and it will show I am in CA. Sometimes, I don't even move out of my chair, and it will change from one place to the other. Now, every time that you beat this dead horse, I am going to refer back to this post, and remind you, because nothing will change!
(However, if anyone can explain that to me, I would love to know why it is that way!
Barney, are you fascinated with this word 'monkiers', and feel that the more you use it, the more intelligent you sound?
Have mercy, Barney, let it go! I am not now, nor have I ever been
This is a public forum. When you throw something out there...I don't care if it is for Jack, for Jill, or for the Three Bears, it is fair game for a response...from anyone!
And, Barney,(big sigh)... oh Barney...
Bless your little p-pickin' brain...you have GOT to come up with better material...original stuff would be appreciated!
You are most transparent...someone uses a word, and you latch on to it, and begin incorporating it in the next few posts.
Case in point...'ego'.
I called you an egomaniac once or twice, and in turn, you take that word, and begin using it in your own posts to describe others.
It certainly isn't the first time you've done it...not the tenth time...nor even the hundredth time...and honestly Barney, you are embarrassing yourself by doing it!
Job will follow
the Living Word

Ashburn, VA

#26215 Aug 6, 2013
Barney, I am quite sure that we will not agree on the topic of scripture, and that is ok. We don't have to.
Let me just get this idea of judging Lot out of the way.
Obviously, you chose to miss the point of my tongue in cheek comment about being judgemental. That's fine. I care nothing about beating that dead horse. We all have eyes...most of us use our brains, and for the most part, after reading each others comments for so long, it is evident that you would be the tiny minority that didn't 'get it'.
I personally don't think calling the incestuous plot and actions by Lot and his daughters vile is being judgemental. In fact, it was not only vile, it was also disgusting. If you feel that I am judgemental because of that, then that is fine.

And yes, you are correct that Ruth was a Moabite, and in the lineage of Christ. Certainly pointing to the grace and mercy in the heart of our God that wouldn't have had to show any grace nor mercy to Mr. Moab, since he was the product of that incestuous act between Lot and his oldest daughter.
(Not to mention Rahab, the harlot, also in the lineage of Christ...talk about a family tree that might cause some to judge...whew!!)
I sure am thankful that He did, though.

So far, we have managed to line up fairly well...until now. Here is probably going to be where we part in our haphazard scriptural unity....
While I will agree that Peter penned this surprising legacy about Lot, Peter most certainly did not 'say' it...and God most definitely did.
Due to the time, I have to go. But I will follow up soon.

Since: Dec 10

Kansas City Ks.

#26216 Aug 6, 2013
the Living Word wrote:
Barney, I am quite sure that we will not agree on the topic of scripture, and that is ok. We don't have to.
Let me just get this idea of judging Lot out of the way.
Obviously, you chose to miss the point of my tongue in cheek comment about being judgemental. That's fine. I care nothing about beating that dead horse. We all have eyes...most of us use our brains, and for the most part, after reading each others comments for so long, it is evident that you would be the tiny minority that didn't 'get it'.
I personally don't think calling the incestuous plot and actions by Lot and his daughters vile is being judgemental. In fact, it was not only vile, it was also disgusting. If you feel that I am judgemental because of that, then that is fine.
And yes, you are correct that Ruth was a Moabite, and in the lineage of Christ. Certainly pointing to the grace and mercy in the heart of our God that wouldn't have had to show any grace nor mercy to Mr. Moab, since he was the product of that incestuous act between Lot and his oldest daughter.
(Not to mention Rahab, the harlot, also in the lineage of Christ...talk about a family tree that might cause some to judge...whew!!)
I sure am thankful that He did, though.
So far, we have managed to line up fairly well...until now. Here is probably going to be where we part in our haphazard scriptural unity....
While I will agree that Peter penned this surprising legacy about Lot, Peter most certainly did not 'say' it...and God most definitely did.
Due to the time, I have to go. But I will follow up soon.
Well shit, who am I to question a eye witness to the event?

Since: Dec 10

Kansas City Ks.

#26217 Aug 6, 2013
have mercy wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh, Barney, grow up! Man up! Don't be a whiney baby!! Have a little pride in yourself! Stop all of these paranoid accusations! My face just flushes and I get all embarrassed for you when I start reading your wild and crazy fantasy island posts! For the last time...
I am hiding nothing! Your awesome detective skills have not caused me to confess anything.
And for the last time, hear me and hear me well...if I could control that silly IP location thing, I would! I live in AR, and I post from my Kindle. I can post one thing from one room and it says I am in VA. I can go to another room in the house, post, and it will show I am in CA. Sometimes, I don't even move out of my chair, and it will change from one place to the other. Now, every time that you beat this dead horse, I am going to refer back to this post, and remind you, because nothing will change!
(However, if anyone can explain that to me, I would love to know why it is that way!
Barney, are you fascinated with this word 'monkiers', and feel that the more you use it, the more intelligent you sound?
Have mercy, Barney, let it go! I am not now, nor have I ever been
This is a public forum. When you throw something out there...I don't care if it is for Jack, for Jill, or for the Three Bears, it is fair game for a response...from anyone!
And, Barney,(big sigh)... oh Barney...
Bless your little p-pickin' brain...you have GOT to come up with better material...original stuff would be appreciated!
You are most transparent...someone uses a word, and you latch on to it, and begin incorporating it in the next few posts.
Case in point...'ego'.
I called you an egomaniac once or twice, and in turn, you take that word, and begin using it in your own posts to describe others.
It certainly isn't the first time you've done it...not the tenth time...nor even the hundredth time...and honestly Barney, you are embarrassing yourself by doing it!
Job will follow
Thank you for good belly laugh this AM sister.

"I called you an egomaniac once or twice, and in turn, you take that word, and begin using it in your own posts"

Really, show me where I used the word "egomaniac" in that post.

Youre Welcome

Jonesboro, AR

#26218 Aug 6, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
Thank you for good belly laugh this AM sister.
"I called you an egomaniac once or twice, and in turn, you take that word, and begin using it in your own posts"
Really, show me where I used the word "egomaniac" in that post.
you don't read what you write, why should anyone else?
Barney is a Form Of Crazy

Conway, AR

#26219 Aug 6, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>

'Being ignored was more than your fragile ego could stand .'

Why Peter said that is still perplexing to biblical scholars today, and rightly so.
Barney, why do you insist on this incessant tit for tat banter...pulling this sad,'I didn't say it' routine when your words give you away?
You are constantly back-tracking, pulling out phrases and partial sentences from someone's post, distorting the original meaning, and adding some sort of comment that you think makes you sound superior and intelligent. Barney, you are neither.

My "fragile ego", Barney? Seriously? One thing's for sure, you keep us laughing!! You know as well as the rest of us know that the root word for 'egomaniac' is ego.
Surely you don't want to embarrass yourself further by explaining how those two words are not the same and you didn't use that descriptive word because I had just used the same FORM of the word to describe you?

You are much more transparent than the Obama administration could ever claim to be!! If only they could take a lesson from you!

And, seriously, Barney... this sentence of yours:
"Why Peter said that is still perplexing to Bible scholars today, and rightly so" is about as original from your mind and fingertips as me trying to claim, "Four score and seven years ago..." as mine.
can i get a cut and paste

Conway, AR

#26220 Aug 6, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
Well shit, who am I to question a eye witness to the event?
I'm sorry, Barney. I'm sure my above post was difficult for you to comprehend seeing how it wasn't copied and pasted from some Bible helps website that you obviously used to enlighten us on Biblical history.
I'm not surprised at all that instead of being able to speak reasonably and intelligently about a topic you know little about, you feel you must respond with profanity and sarcasm...both the typical diversion paths of choice for those that get in over their head.
(Lest we all forget, it was your choice to extend the invitation more than once to expound this discussion.)

And in your true to form, typical, transparent Barney style of writing, your post is setting the stage and opening the door for you to eventually divert the attention from Scripture, which will be difficult for you to discuss, and on to mockery and passing judgements on those that chose to believe the Bible is indeed the Living Word of God, as self righteous, "hypocritical idiots" that you detest.(I believe those were a couple of the descriptive words you previously used to pass your personal judgement on others).

It's ok, Barney. We all see through your transparency. We were all ready for it...expecting it...and laughing when you confirmed what we knew was coming with this post of yours.

"...an eyewitness to the event." Oh Barney... you really are a predictable hoot!!
just say no

San Jose, CA

#26221 Aug 6, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
You know, I have short-changed your originality just a bit, and feel that I must give credit where credit is due!
I am quite sure that the following has only been used by you, Barney...several times, in fact, and that you never had the opportunity to borrow this one from a poster here.
"... your panties in such a wad..."
Of course, I don't believe another poster here would dare use such a quote...but you own this one!

"Wrong again Cupcake..."
Now, about this matter of referring to me as, "Cupcake". I would ask that you not do it again.
I realize that it is within your right to do so, but I'd just ask you not to.
Reality Check

Lonoke, AR

#26222 Aug 6, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
QUOTE: "in the New Testament, God calls Lot a righteous man"
Wrong again Cupcake, God did not say that, Peter did.(2Peter 2.7)
It's called the Word of God, not the word of Peter. Written by man divinely inspired by God. It is God's word.

Since: Dec 10

Kansas City Ks.

#26223 Aug 6, 2013
just say no wrote:
<quoted text>
You know, I have short-changed your originality just a bit, and feel that I must give credit where credit is due!
I am quite sure that the following has only been used by you, Barney...several times, in fact, and that you never had the opportunity to borrow this one from a poster here.
"... your panties in such a wad..."
Of course, I don't believe another poster here would dare use such a quote...but you own this one!
"Wrong again Cupcake..."
Now, about this matter of referring to me as, "Cupcake". I would ask that you not do it again.
I realize that it is within your right to do so, but I'd just ask you not to.
Damn, you have your manic on today Cupcake. Don't stop now, you are on a roll.
ABC

San Jose, CA

#26224 Aug 6, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
QUOTE: "in the New Testament, God calls Lot a righteous man"
Wrong again Cupcake, God did not say that, Peter did.(2Peter 2.7)
And finally, I will address this...your grand finale gaffe of the day.
The Word of God is alive and active, Barney! It is the very Word of God....not the words of the men He inspired to write His Word.
If you do not believe this, then there will be no further need to discuss His Word with you, and your opinion of God's Word will have zero merit.
This is not because I am intolerant of others...or that I am self righteous or hypocritical. I am not the originator of the proclamation that all Scripture is given by God or that it is His Word.
God said it and I chose to believe Him.
If you have any sort of problem with that, or any mocking and sarcastic remarks, please take that up with Him.
I am not going to demand you think like me...try to 'prove' the validity of scripture and demand that you accept God's Word the way I have chosen to accept it and believe it. That is your business.

However, if you you chose to believe the Bible is not the Word of God, and that it is not alive and active, it will be a moot point to discuss it with you.

strawberry please

Ashburn, VA

#26225 Aug 6, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
Damn, you have your manic on today Cupcake. Don't stop now, you are on a roll.
And we have a winner!! Poor old Barney!!
Throw the bait and reel him in...and in record time!
I thought, if you had even a mustard seeds worth of shame or self-respect you would at least wait a couple of hours before that little kid mentality of yours would respond back with a 'cupcake' comment, but even I didn't really get just how simple-minded you really truly are!
One of these days, when you begin to mature a little, a long long way in the future, you will begin to understand how you embarrass yourself so badly by being so predictable and transparent.
But for now...Well...you just keep making it too easy to find cheap entertainment!! We all get to just sit back, cast a few pieces of bait your way, and watch you race to get caught.
Yep...cheap and fun entertainment you are, Barney!!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Snow-Lake Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Who do you support for U.S. House in Arkansas (... (Oct '10) Feb '11 reader 66
Snow-Lake Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Snow-Lake People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 4:46 pm PST