The Truth about UCDD
Posted in the Smithville Forum
#3 Sep 12, 2012
If you figure all of Wendys reimbursements for supplies and include the credit card payments and the alleged reimbursement to UCDD for supplies, Wendy received $28,704.28 from Living the Dream. Wendy was reimbursing herself for supplies at a rate of approximately $2,000 per month, with the exception of May 2011. May was a good month for Wendy, she reimbursed herself $4,441.30. Now, understand these do not include reimbursements from the construction account, only the operational account. Remember the used furniture that Wendy sold to Living the Dream at new furniture retail price. The money for the furniture came from the construction account. Wendy sold the furniture for almost $10,000. It was used out of date furniture and was worth at best $200. Wendy also received other payments for reimbursements from the construction account. I havent finished crunching the numbers on the construction account, but Wendy easily received over $50,000 in reimbursements from Living the Dream that were questionable at best.
Why is all this important? For a couple of reasons. One is that Michelle Price, who Farley has picked as his Deputy Director was the person cooking the books at Living the Dream and L.A. Management. Farley knows that Michelle is corrupt and was deeply involved in the fraud that took place. This is the kind of people Farley is surrounding himself with at UCDD. Why? Because the Board is still calling the shots. Farley is a Pussy, and doesnt have the guts to stand up to them. He lied in his interview when Charles Curtiss asked him if he would ever stand up to the Board. He said yes, what a baldface liar. As I stated before, Farley is going to try to convince everyone that the auditors discovered that Wendy only misused approximately $10,000 in funds. Thats a contradiction from the letter written by Wendys attorney, Jack Lowery. Lowery stated that he personally talked to the auditors and the amount in question was $1,229. Dont you find it strange that all these people are talking to the auditors and they keep coming up with different figures? First of all, I think it is unprofessional and unethical for the auditors to be discussing their findings with anyone until the audit is made public. If the audit comes back with findings under $10,000, you can bet your bottom dollar that the auditors were politically influenced by someone. Dont think for one minute that auditors cant be influenced politically, that certain can and have been in the past.
Farley has been instructed by the corrupt Board members to help them cover up the audit so everyone will forget about the corruption at UCDD. The Board members want to move past this issue, because it is hard for them to continue to be corrupt with News Channel 5 constantly looking over their shoulders. Farley is mealy mouth spineless weasel who has fallen into the corruption along with the UCDD Board members. Farley was obviously the wrong choice for the job of executive director that is why the Board chose him. They needed someone to be their puppet. Things are no different at UCDD, they might a well just brought Wendy back. Its time for Farley and the Board to GO.
#4 Sep 12, 2012
So will mike foster go to prison?
#5 Sep 12, 2012
Nothing better than corruption representing corruption n the courts. She will walk even if he has to pay the judge himself......
#6 Sep 15, 2012
Good post thanks for filling the public in on everything.
Add your comments below
|Butch cook (Feb '14)||3 hr||Restless Citizen||57|
|who is ready for arbys to open||9 hr||catfish||11|
|Speeding Driver||10 hr||Well||26|
|Anyone know Amber Matchett||11 hr||Uwishurpussydidn||12|
|Anyone where Tonya Babson Audas is??||Thu||Merica||11|
|Jimmy Fuson||Aug 23||yoyo||14|
|Panhandlers at Walmart... (Mar '15)||Aug 23||Hoss||14|
Find what you want!
Search Smithville Forum Now
Copyright © 2016 Topix LLC