Calling the Global Warming charlatans "Nazis" | by Alan Caruba

Mar 12, 2014 Full story: Sonoran News 30

On February 20, the noted meteorologist, Dr. Roy W. Spencer, fed up with being called a "denier" of global warming, posted a commentary on his blog titled "Time to push back against the global warming Nazis."

Read more
First Prev
of 2
Next Last
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#1 Mar 12, 2014
Roy Spencer's Junk Science

http://www.skepticalscience.com/roy-spencers-...

Nuff said..

“I Luv Carbon Dioxide”

Since: Dec 08

Location hidden

#2 Mar 13, 2014
Right on! Denier means believing the Holocaust didn't happen, its offensive to apply the term to man made catastrophic climate change skeptics. They misuse the word because truth isn't on their side.

“I Luv Carbon Dioxide”

Since: Dec 08

Location hidden

#3 Mar 13, 2014
On February 20, the noted meteorologist, Dr. Roy W. Spencer, fed up with being called a “denier” of global warming, posted a commentary on his blog titled “Time to push back against the global warming Nazis.” 1

“When politicians and scientists started calling people like me ‘deniers’, they crossed the line. They are still doing it,” said Dr. Spencer.“They indirectly equate (1) the skeptics’ view that global warming is not necessarily all manmade nor a serious problem with (2) the denial that the Nazi’s extermination of millions of Jews ever happened.” The Holocaust happened, but global warming’s latest natural cycle ended about 17 years ago and, as a lot of people have noticed, it has been getting cold since then.

“Like the Nazis,” said Dr. Spencer,“they advocate the supreme authority of the state (fascism), which in turn supports their scientific research to support their cause…” In the case of global warming, this huge hoax was put forth by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change....

http://www.sonorannews.com/archives/2014/1403...
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#4 Mar 13, 2014
Spencer is a signatory to An Evangelical Declaration on Global Warming,[24][25] which states that "Earth and its ecosystems – created by God's intelligent design and infinite power and sustained by His faithful providence – are robust, resilient, self-regulating, and self-correcting".[26]

where [26] says: An Evangelical Declaration on Global Warming "We believe Earth and its ecosystems – created by God's intelligent design and infinite power and sustained by His faithful providence – are robust, resilient, self-regulating, and self-correcting, admirably suited for human flourishing, and displaying His glory."
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#5 Mar 13, 2014
An Evangelical Declaration on Global Warming "We believe Earth and its ecosystems – created by God's intelligent design and infinite power and sustained by His faithful providence – are robust, resilient, self-regulating, and self-correcting, admirably suited for human flourishing, and displaying His glory."

Really? They see global warming is in good hands but not the Germans.
Cordwainer Trout

Elizabethtown, KY

#6 Mar 13, 2014
Keep in mind it is the AGW proponents and grant recipients, whose projections have ALL been shown wrong by actual real data. It is the AGW Nazis disregarding a 17 year and six month hiatus from global warming doesn't conflict with their otherwise totally erroneous models. It has been the AGW Nazis altering historical temperatures in their models to make their projections even more hysteric.

After all... they are claiming a less than one half degree rise in temperature in SOME measurements over the last thirty-five years represents a total breakdown of an ecosystem repeatedly resilient and self-correcting with CO2 levels tens times what they are now. Global Warming Nazis only look at the ice cores supporting their grant driven science.
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#7 Mar 13, 2014
Cordwainer Trout wrote:
Keep in mind it is the AGW proponents and grant recipients, whose projections have ALL been shown wrong by actual real data. It is the AGW Nazis disregarding a 17 year and six month hiatus from global warming doesn't conflict with their otherwise totally erroneous models. It has been the AGW Nazis altering historical temperatures in their models to make their projections even more hysteric.
After all... they are claiming a less than one half degree rise in temperature in SOME measurements over the last thirty-five years represents a total breakdown of an ecosystem repeatedly resilient and self-correcting with CO2 levels tens times what they are now. Global Warming Nazis only look at the ice cores supporting their grant driven science.
Hey, where's your source?

Look at the IPCC model predictions and see how so-called contrarians fail in comparison:

http://www.skepticalscience.com/graphics/Pred...

Do you need help reading graphs?
Cordwainer Trout

Elizabethtown, KY

#8 Mar 13, 2014
SpaceBlues wrote:
<quoted text>Hey, where's your source?
Look at the IPCC model predictions and see how so-called contrarians fail in comparison:
http://www.skepticalscience.com/graphics/Pred...
Do you need help reading graphs?
Gray to IPCC: "Globally averaged near surface temperature" What nonsense! Nobody has ever measured such a quantity. It would require simultaneous measurements of thermometers situated randomly over the entire earth's surface, including the oceans." - "Detection" and "Attribution" are mechanisms of organised guesswork They provide only speculation, not evidence of cause and effect"

"You have failed once more to show that the climate is influenced in any way by changes in emissions of trace gases"
http://theclimatescepticsparty.blogspot.com/2...
Cordwainer Trout

Elizabethtown, KY

#9 Mar 13, 2014
Since the Global Warming Nazis seem to like graphs, here's a few...

"The IPCC has now abandoned any attempt to base their claims on facts. Historical data shows that the climate has gotten better since the 1950s."

https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2013/09/2...

The IPCC head has admitted openly and without equivocation, that Global Warming assertions are about controlling the world's economies and imposing Marxism, not this silliness of "saving the planet."
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#10 Mar 13, 2014
Who's Gray? He (born 1922, London) is a New Zealand-based chemist, and a founder of the New Zealand Climate Science Coalition.

He has been an "Expert Reviewer for the IPCC" since 1990,[1][6] although this consideration has been challenged and considered misleading since it does not require any expertise at all, but only that "he asked to see the draft report" and signed an agreement not to publicly comment on the draft report.[9]
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#11 Mar 13, 2014
Here's another for the desperate namecallers:

http://tamino.files.wordpress.com/2014/01/ber...

make sure to view the full graph.
Cordwainer Trout

Elizabethtown, KY

#12 Mar 13, 2014
What matters is NOT who critics are, but whether their arguments and rebuttals make sense and are grounded in real science. Global Warming Nazis don't have the data and the real charts contradict their claims, so they resort to argumentum ad hominem.
Cordwainer Trout

Elizabethtown, KY

#13 Mar 13, 2014
The IPCC has discredited itself repeatedly. Its "science" is flawed, related to political agendas and fed by grant monies. Altered data, altered graphs and totally ridiculous claims are their demise, not the people exposing them.
Cat74

Schaumburg, IL

#14 Mar 13, 2014
Global warming, climate change, whatever they are calling it this week is a hoax. There are as many Scientists that deny it as agree to it. There is no consensus, none. It is a scam to get more money out of the taxpayers, and we won't pay. Not this time. They have been predicting major disasters for decades, and nothing came of it. Al Gore made millions from hawking the scam.
litesong

Lynnwood, WA

#15 Mar 13, 2014
Brian_G wrote:
(Spencer states,) "They indirectly equate..... the skeptics’ view that global warming is not necessarily all manmade..... as a lot of people have noticed, it has been getting cold since then.
The above Spencer statements prove he is an AGW denier, or he would know that his statements aren't true. First, AGW advocates do not believe present global warming is all man-made. Second, the following statement is why slimy steenking toxic topix AGW deniers state that they are cold & believe untruthfully that global cooling is occurring.

AGW energy enhanced warm fronts push hard into the high Arctic North Pole region of millions of square kilometers! Temperatures are outrageously high, as much as 16degC(29degF) above normal. Of course, such great energy pushes Arctic cold, quicker to southern populated regions than times past, setting cold weather records AND EVEN ALL-TIME RECORDED LOW TEMPERATURES.

Yes, Spencer knows the greater atmospheric energy is pushing Arctic cold to the south most vigorously, but hides the truth because he is an AGW denier.

Since: Apr 08

"the green troll"

#16 Mar 13, 2014
SpaceBlues wrote:
An Evangelical Declaration on Global Warming "We believe Earth and its ecosystems – created by God's intelligent design and infinite power and sustained by His faithful providence – are robust, resilient, self-regulating, and self-correcting, admirably suited for human flourishing, and displaying His glory."
Really? They see global warming is in good hands but not the Germans.
I bet you cordwanger troutbrain is a creationist too: he's just the type.
litesong

Lynnwood, WA

#17 Mar 13, 2014
SpaceBlues wrote:
Here's another for the desperate namecallers:
http://tamino.files.wordpress.com/2014/01/ber...
make sure to view the full graph.
Your graph covers 5+ million square kilometers of high Arctic surface average temperatures around the North Pole. Even greater temperature rises are being observed specifically for the regions, 80th parallel to the North Pole.

Thank you for the science clarifying the wild temperature rises in the high Arctic.

“I Luv Carbon Dioxide”

Since: Dec 08

Location hidden

#18 Mar 14, 2014
SpaceBlues wrote:
Spencer is a....
climatologist, Principal Research Scientist at the University of Alabama in Huntsville, and the U.S. Science Team leader for the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer (AMSR-E) on NASA's Aqua satellite. He has served as Senior Scientist for Climate Studies at NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center.

They can't discuss his theories so they use the ad hominem fallacy to irrationally attack the man, not the argument.

Since: Apr 08

"the green troll"

#19 Mar 14, 2014
Brian_G wrote:
They can't discuss his theories...
Spencer's theories discussed...

https://www.skepticalscience.com/skeptic_Roy_...
Cat74

Bolingbrook, IL

#20 Mar 14, 2014
Democrats are so funny. Forget about Benghazi, NSA spying, Obamascam, and concentrate on climate change. Don't call it global warming. because the snow is butt high to a tall Indian, and the only shovels ready now are snow shovels. Sorry, children, but you will answer for Benghazi, spying, and destroying the Healthcare system in November. See ya at the polls.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Shelton Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Soldier Timmons after molesting his daughter an... 12 hr Happy guy 6
News Elma Man Pees On Power Line, Dies (Mar '10) Mar 18 destiny 3
Penis Enlargement Bible - Is it a Scam? (Sep '13) Mar 10 Deraza 27
Thurston County Animal Shelter NO CARING THERE!!! (May '12) Mar 1 dendrizzi 33
Debate: Marijuana - Shelton, WA (Aug '10) Dec '14 Chris D. 21
Miss Paula Nichols Modeling and Horses (Jun '10) Sep '14 passed by and cried 25
News 1 dead, 1 in custody after shooting in Allyn Th... (Jul '14) Jul '14 Andrea 2
Shelton Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Shelton People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]