Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil Unions

There are 51742 comments on the CBS2 story from Nov 30, 2010, titled Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil Unions. In it, CBS2 reports that:

The Illinois House has approved a measure to legalize civil unions for same-sex couples.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at CBS2.

Neil An Blowme

Hoboken, NJ

#42447 Oct 3, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
I've read what you posted before you posted it.
What you are trying to deliberately cover is that the committee VINDICATED Regnerus!
Read this and gnash your teeth reprobate;
http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2012/10/678...
"How many children were raised by two women staying together from the child’s first birthday to his or her eighteenth? Just two. And how many such cases were there in the FGR category—of children raised by two men together for their whole childhood? Zero. This, out of an initial population of 15,000.
I recite these numbers to make a point of my own that fairly leaps off the pages of Regnerus’s work: that family instability is the characteristic experience of those whose parents have same-sex relationships. This is what Regnerus is getting at when he says that critics who want him to treat stability as a “control variable” are actually “controlling for the pathways.” To go on an endless search for a sizable random sample of long-term, stable same-sex couples raising children is to miss the social reality in front of us, namely that they are conspicuously missing from the lives of children whose parents have same-sex relationships."
Smirk.
You are funny. Regnerus' study proved no such thing.

Damn, you hicks are STOOPID!
Neil An Blowme

Hoboken, NJ

#42448 Oct 3, 2013
CDC wrote:
You got a point there toolman HA HA HA!
<quoted text>
I guess lickmytool means put your tongue on a wrench, eh? You phobes are too stupid.
Neil An Blowme

Hoboken, NJ

#42449 Oct 3, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_scie...
don_t_let_criticism_of_the_new _gay_parents_study_become_a_wa r_on_science.html
"Mark Regnerus is a hateful bigot. He’s an ultra-conservative with links to Opus Dei. His new research paper on same-sex parenting is “intentionally misleading” and “seeks to disparage lesbian and gay parents.” His “so-called study doesn’t match 30 years of scientific research that shows overwhelmingly that children raised by parents who are LGBT do equally as well.” His “junk science” and “pseudo-scientific misinformation,” pitted against statements from the American Psychological Association and “every major child welfare organization,” deserve no coverage or credence.
That’s what four of the nation’s leading gay-rights groups—the Human Rights Campaign, the Family Equality Council, Freedom to Marry, and the Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation —declared in a joint statement this week. Flanked by a mob of bloggers, they’re out to attack Regnerus’ motives, destroy his credibility, and banish his study from the scientific record. Even Slate contributor E.J. Graff says “Slate's editors should be ashamed” for publishing Regnerus’“dangerous propaganda.”
Thanks for giving us proof that your views are of the lunatic fringe.
CDC

Saint Louis, MO

#42450 Oct 3, 2013
Well blow me down...he used the "P" word. Run away Run away...
.
.
How dumb can this Neil get?
Neil An Blowme wrote:
<quoted text>
I guess lickmytool means put your tongue on a wrench, eh? You phobes are too stupid.

Judged:

11

11

11

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Neil An Blowme

Hoboken, NJ

#42451 Oct 3, 2013
CDC wrote:
Well blow me down...he used the "P" word. Run away Run away...
.
.
How dumb can this Neil get?
<quoted text>
I'd have to be lobotomized to be as dumb as you, closet boy.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#42452 Oct 3, 2013
Neil An Blowme wrote:
<quoted text>
Thanks for giving us proof that your views are of the lunatic fringe.
Yeah, that's what the Slate article proved, lol.
You are such a depraved idiot.

Judged:

11

11

11

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
CDC

Saint Louis, MO

#42453 Oct 3, 2013
Don't you need a brain to be lobotomized?
Neil An Blowme wrote:
<quoted text>
I'd have to be lobotomized to be as dumb as you, closet boy.

Judged:

11

11

11

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Neil An Blowme

Hoboken, NJ

#42454 Oct 3, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah, that's what the Slate article proved, lol.
You are such a depraved idiot.
.... said the lunatic fringe, KiMerde. Oh boy! YOUR opinion has value..... You even post quotes that PROVE you are a lunatic.... gotta love it!
lickmytool

Mount Vernon, IL

#42455 Oct 3, 2013
Neil An Blowme wrote:
<quoted text>
...and what does lickmytool mean?
You're such a dumbass.
Get out from under the rock or get out of your cave. And learn something fool. tool is another name for a mans dixk. And if you had one you would know his.lol

Judged:

11

11

11

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Neil An Blowme

Hoboken, NJ

#42456 Oct 3, 2013
lickmytool wrote:
<quoted text> Get out from under the rock or get out of your cave. And learn something fool. tool is another name for a mans dixk. And if you had one you would know his.lol
Duh. Ever hear of sarcasm, numbnuts? What's the difference between our chosen names, dipshit? You called me out, yet your name means exactly the same damn thing.
helllounut

Mount Vernon, IL

#42458 Oct 3, 2013
Neil An Blowme wrote:
<quoted text>
Duh. Ever hear of sarcasm, numbnuts? What's the difference between our chosen names, dipshit? You called me out, yet your name means exactly the same damn thing.
Neil an blowme. Is that what your dad said to you ?

Judged:

14

14

14

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#42459 Oct 3, 2013
The demand for ss couples to be equated to marriage is that children be removed from consideration to equate ss couples to marriage, and mother and father be removed to equate ss couples to family.

And that is good and right?

Judged:

14

14

14

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#42460 Oct 3, 2013
KiMare wrote:
The demand for ss couples to be equated to marriage is that children be removed from consideration to equate ss couples to marriage, and mother and father be removed to equate ss couples to family.
And that is good and right?
You're the only person making that demand, Dilbert.

The rest of us know that children are not REQUIRED of marriage.

You're argument is lame, tired, and so busted.

Troll on, KiMerde.

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#42461 Oct 3, 2013
helllounut wrote:
<quoted text>Neil an blowme. Is that what your dad said to you ?
Hey, hey, hey! Why must you assume that his father was anything like yours?

Since: Jun 11

AOL

#42462 Oct 3, 2013
Some opposite sex couples will still continue to reproduce, and get married. Treating same sex couples equally under all of the same laws won't change that. Children and parents will still form families.

"Although the House Report is filled with encomia to heterosexual marriage, DOMA does not increase benefits to opposite-sex couples--whose marriages may in any event be childless, unstable or both--or explain how denying benefits to same-sex couples will reinforce heterosexual marriage. Certainly, the denial will not affect the gender choices of those seeking marriage. This is not merely a matter of poor fit of remedy to perceived problem, Lee Optical, 348 U.S. at 487-88; City of Cleburne, 473 U.S. at 446-50, but a lack of any demonstrated connection between DOMA's treatment of same-sex couples and its asserted goal of strengthening the bonds and benefits to society of heterosexual marriage." First Circuit Appellate

http://www.ca1.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/getopn.pl...

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#42464 Oct 4, 2013
KiMare wrote:
The demand for ss couples to be equated to marriage is that children be removed from consideration to equate ss couples to marriage, and mother and father be removed to equate ss couples to family.
And that is good and right?
Dusty Mangina wrote:
<quoted text>
You're the only person making that demand, Dilbert.
The rest of us know that children are not REQUIRED of marriage.
You're argument is lame, tired, and so busted.
Troll on, KiMerde.
Read what I wrote again.

"The DEMAND... is that children be removed from CONSIDERATION"

How horrible, isn't it. Kids are thrown under the bus for your denial.

Oh, you forgot the other half;

"The demand for ss couples to be equated to marriage is that... mother and father be removed to equate ss couples to family."

You throw your mother and father under the bus too!

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#42465 Oct 4, 2013
Not Yet Equal wrote:
Some opposite sex couples will still continue to reproduce, and get married. Treating same sex couples equally under all of the same laws won't change that. Children and parents will still form families.
"Although the House Report is filled with encomia to heterosexual marriage, DOMA does not increase benefits to opposite-sex couples--whose marriages may in any event be childless, unstable or both--or explain how denying benefits to same-sex couples will reinforce heterosexual marriage. Certainly, the denial will not affect the gender choices of those seeking marriage. This is not merely a matter of poor fit of remedy to perceived problem, Lee Optical, 348 U.S. at 487-88; City of Cleburne, 473 U.S. at 446-50, but a lack of any demonstrated connection between DOMA's treatment of same-sex couples and its asserted goal of strengthening the bonds and benefits to society of heterosexual marriage." First Circuit Appellate
http://www.ca1.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/getopn.pl...
The demand for ss couples to be equated to marriage is that children be removed from consideration to equate ss couples to marriage, and mother and father be removed to equate ss couples to family.

And that is good and right?
Neil An Blowme

Hoboken, NJ

#42466 Oct 4, 2013
helllounut wrote:
<quoted text>Neil an blowme. Is that what your dad said to you ?
15, aren't you?
Neil An Blowme

Hoboken, NJ

#42467 Oct 4, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
The demand for ss couples to be equated to marriage is that children be removed from consideration to equate ss couples to marriage, and mother and father be removed to equate ss couples to family.
And that is good and right?
It's crazy talk and makes no sense. Is English your second language?
CDC

Saint Louis, MO

#42468 Oct 4, 2013
12, aren't you?
Neil An Blowme wrote:
<quoted text>
15, aren't you?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Shelbyville Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Indian/Pakistani young top Guy for Bottom Pakis... (Apr '14) 1 hr bund 7
Pakistani UK Bi/Gay Skype (Feb '14) 22 hr asif 320
pot head teacher (Aug '12) Apr 29 two of a kind 16
dope smoking high school teacher Apr 29 a real doper 1
Impeachment charges against Marvin Hanson (Dec '08) Apr 8 Pissed off 12
Most arrogant teacher award Stew-Stras Don Oyer (May '14) Mar '15 Dawn 2
White young chavs in bradford (Nov '14) Mar '15 asif 4
More from around the web

Shelbyville People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]