Case for consolidation

Case for consolidation

There are 1 comment on the Berkshire Eagle story from Oct 26, 2009, titled Case for consolidation. In it, Berkshire Eagle reports that:

Officials from three South Berkshire school districts were quick to dismiss the concept of consolidation at a meeting last week at the Mahaiwe in Great Barrington, and given the disappointing turnout for the information session they can probably conclude that voters favor the status quo.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Berkshire Eagle.

HellerCarbonCapN TradeCo

Rockville, MD

#1 Oct 27, 2009
How can The Berkshire Eagle make a serious plea for consolidation when the history of consolidation repeatedly shows that it doesn't save a dime and even leads to higher overall costs and added expensive layers of bureaucracy?
If anything, de-centralization is the route municipalities would be wise to take.
Especially in a county losing both population and jobs.
Decentralization means bringing back those smaller neighborhood schools right in one's home community.
Why bus a kid 15-25 miles when he/she can have the opportunity to walk or be driven a mile and a half to the local school?
Why have a multi-layered bureaucracy of overpaid administrators when a local school can get away with having a teacher and principal in one and the same person?
Large consolidated school systems mean having to deal with -- and negotiate with -- intransigant and greedy teacher unions with their requisite platinum-plated union contracts containing all those budget-busting union bells and whistles (like cushy health and pension benefit plans).
Large centralized school systems also mean dealing with expensive bussing company contracts.
Going small and local avails the local municipality of the opportunity of no teacher unions and privately negotiated teaching contracts, just like if the municipality were negotiating the salary of the local highway superintendent or town secretary.
The most important aspect of going small, though, is the improved education afforded the children.
Better one-on-one tutoring and low student-teacher ratios are realized in small school scenarios.
Given all the pluses inherent in small, it makes one wonder just why The Berkshire Eagle is so insistent on a bigger dinosaur, especially after the fiasco that is the Southern Berkshire Regional School District?
Could it be that The Eagle likes union contracts, layers of bureaucrats, and transportation company costs?
Go figure.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Sheffield Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Ex-Eagleton admits to kicking student, claiming... Jun 20 Cops are Sociopaths 2
News Pride fest returns to Pittsfield with souped-up... Jun 9 God 24
Review: Ilovekickboxing - Peabody (Dec '15) Jun 1 PamG 73
News BRTA approves deficit budget, staring down cuts May 30 Paul Kersey 4
News Our Opinion: South Berkshire not immune to opio... May 29 Gary 6
News Another former Eagleton School staffer found gu... May '18 cil 9
News Fifth Eagleton School staffer guilty of assault... May '18 Stranger Danger 4

Sheffield Jobs

Personal Finance

Sheffield Mortgages