Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-S...

Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil Unions

There are 52052 comments on the CBS2 story from Nov 30, 2010, titled Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil Unions. In it, CBS2 reports that:

The Illinois House has approved a measure to legalize civil unions for same-sex couples.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at CBS2.

laughing man

Luton, UK

#40347 Jun 29, 2013
Rose Feratu wrote:
<quoted text>I'm not the one who is confused about it, fuckface.
Please have the doctors check you for a stroke. You seriously aren't making sense.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#40348 Jun 29, 2013
Rose Feratu wrote:
<quoted text>I'm not the one who is confused about it, fuckface.
If I wrote out "f***face like you just did, I'd be censored away.

Your profanity speaks volumes about your state of mind. Relax spice boy.
Zoro

Rock Island, IL

#40349 Jun 29, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm just curious.
Since the SCOTUS ruling equating ss couples with marriage, does that mean duplicate gendered couples will change to diverse gendered couples, or the other way around?
Will ss couples start mutually bearing children? I can't wait to see the change!
Oh, and when will a gay anus turn into a vagina?
Is procreation a requirement in marriage?

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#40350 Jun 29, 2013
snyper wrote:
<quoted text>
Those questions only have traction IF one accepts the unstated premise that "marriage" is identical to erotic activities or reproduction. That correlation doesn't come close to approaching unity.
In other words, if you take away all the differences and key elements of marriage, then they are the same.

LOL
Zoro

Rock Island, IL

#40351 Jun 29, 2013
KiMare wrote:
Can anyone tell me what's wrong?
SCOTUS equated ss couples to marriage, but they still are a mutually sterile, duplicate gendered half of marriage.
Clearly not equal.
Maybe it has to be a unanimous decision???
Snicker.
OK which of them said that they still are a mutually sterile, duplicate gendered half of marriage.
Clearly not equal.

Please post a link so that we may all read the actual quote.
Zoro

Rock Island, IL

#40352 Jun 29, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
If I wrote out "f***face like you just did, I'd be censored away.
Your profanity speaks volumes about your state of mind. Relax spice boy.
As does your fake support for gay rights. Have a great day
laughing man

Luton, UK

#40353 Jun 29, 2013
Zoro wrote:
<quoted text>As does your fake support for gay rights. Have a great day
Fake?

If y'all want to take the Rainbow Bridge halfway to the desert island of your choice, then I'm all for it!
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#40354 Jun 29, 2013
Zoro wrote:
<quoted text>As does your fake support for gay rights. Have a great day
"Have a great day"? You ain't going anywhere moron and you really don't want me to have a great day. Just more of your verbal diarrhea.

Poor Jizzy is mad. Funny stuff!
Zoro

Rock Island, IL

#40355 Jun 29, 2013
laughing man wrote:
<quoted text>
Fake?
If y'all want to take the Rainbow Bridge halfway to the desert island of your choice, then I'm all for it!
Your what hurts?
Zoro

Rock Island, IL

#40356 Jun 29, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
"Have a great day"? You ain't going anywhere moron and you really don't want me to have a great day. Just more of your verbal diarrhea.
Poor Jizzy is mad. Funny stuff!
Frankie how ya doing? Still holding out for SCOTUS to tie polygamy to same sex marriage?
Zoro

Rock Island, IL

#40358 Jun 29, 2013
Sparkle_is_stripper wrote:
<quoted text>hi sweetie
Hello baby, how was the stage last night? I read that the girls are saluting the sun again :-)

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#40359 Jun 29, 2013
KiMare wrote: Can anyone tell me what's wrong? SCOTUS equated ss couples to marriage, but they still are a mutually sterile, duplicate gendered half of marriage. Clearly not equal. Maybe it has to be a unanimous decision??? Snicker.
Zoro wrote:
<quoted text>OK which of them said that they still are a mutually sterile, duplicate gendered half of marriage.
Clearly not equal.
Please post a link so that we may all read the actual quote.
Kind of slow there honey...

SCOTUS equated ss couples to marriage.

Reality is not listening. Ss couples are still a mutually sterile, duplicate gendered half of marriage.

Why isn't reality listening???

Snicker.
thegayblade

Mokena, IL

#40362 Jun 29, 2013
Zoro wrote:
<quoted text>Is procreation a requirement in marriage?
No but to procreate you need a female and a male. Not two males packing the fudge from behind.
Zoro

Rock Island, IL

#40363 Jun 29, 2013
Sparkle_is_stripper wrote:
<quoted text>ya... last night was really good made $957... sweet
:)
Atta girl, got to pay for the lift job.
Zoro

Rock Island, IL

#40364 Jun 29, 2013
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote: Can anyone tell me what's wrong? SCOTUS equated ss couples to marriage, but they still are a mutually sterile, duplicate gendered half of marriage. Clearly not equal. Maybe it has to be a unanimous decision??? Snicker.
<quoted text>
Kind of slow there honey...
SCOTUS equated ss couples to marriage.
Reality is not listening. Ss couples are still a mutually sterile, duplicate gendered half of marriage.
Why isn't reality listening???
Snicker.
I see SCOTUS, said that same sex marriage is equal to that of opposite sex marriage. You some how disagree. Is that it? You should try and get an appointment to the Supreme court. Then your opinion might just have some validity.
Zoro

Rock Island, IL

#40365 Jun 29, 2013
thegayblade wrote:
<quoted text>
No but to procreate you need a female and a male. Not two males packing the fudge from behind.
Well not really.
http://www.google.com/url...

I guess you are not needed at all. Hey you can always eat tater chips and be a wanker

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#40366 Jun 29, 2013
KiMare wrote: Can anyone tell me what's wrong? SCOTUS equated ss couples to marriage, but they still are a mutually sterile, duplicate gendered half of marriage. Clearly not equal. Maybe it has to be a unanimous decision??? Snicker. Kind of slow there honey... SCOTUS equated ss couples to marriage. Reality is not listening. Ss couples are still a mutually sterile, duplicate gendered half of marriage. Why isn't reality listening??? Snicker.
Zoro wrote:
<quoted text>I see SCOTUS, said that same sex marriage is equal to that of opposite sex marriage. You some how disagree. Is that it? You should try and get an appointment to the Supreme court. Then your opinion might just have some validity.
No, you are still deliberately confused.

I didn't give my opinion, I mocked reality not listening to SCOTUS.
Rock Fudgeson

Mokena, IL

#40367 Jun 29, 2013
The 'mo community is in an uproar because the SCOTUS ruling did not define marriage nor did it make 'mo marriage the law of the land. Boo hoo.

SCOTUS struck down only ONE provision of DOMA, section 3 which means the federal gov must recognize same sex marriage in states that redefine it.

No state is mandated to recognize another states law of it's redefinition of marriage. That is still the law.

And in all 50 states marriage laws are unchanged even in California where marriage is defined as between a man and woman.
Lilith

Seattle, WA

#40368 Jun 29, 2013
Must suck having to put so much effort into denying people equallity.... guess bigots just have no life
Zoro

Rock Island, IL

#40369 Jun 29, 2013
Rock Fudgeson wrote:
The 'mo community is in an uproar because the SCOTUS ruling did not define marriage nor did it make 'mo marriage the law of the land. Boo hoo.
SCOTUS struck down only ONE provision of DOMA, section 3 which means the federal gov must recognize same sex marriage in states that redefine it.
No state is mandated to recognize another states law of it's redefinition of marriage. That is still the law.
And in all 50 states marriage laws are unchanged even in California where marriage is defined as between a man and woman.
No spunky, 13 states and Washington DC, define marriage as a contract between two people.

GAY MARRIAGE BANNED BY STATE LAW

Indiana

North Carolina

Pennsylvania

West Virginia

Wyoming

The 25 states listed below do not allow gay marriages or civil unions of any sort.

Alaska

Alabama

Arizona

Arkansas

Florida

Georgia

Idaho

Kansas

Kentucky

Louisiana

Michigan

Missouri

Mississippi

Montana

Nebraska

North Carolina

North Dakota

Ohio

Oklahoma

South Carolina

South Dakota

Tennessee

Texas

Utah

Virginia

That leaves 7 states that allow same sex unions.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Sesser Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Cary Mosley 1 hr Sorry 13
Megan carlton 2 hr Lol 17
Miracle 3 hr stupid 4
Who is the biggest drunk in Franklin County? 3 hr Yes sir 6
Outrageous water bill 7 hr OldHef 8
Burnetts bath day 7 hr JasonDone 20
Outlaws AKA Sissy Snitches 8 hr JC Press 23

Sesser Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Sesser Mortgages