Starbucks Allowing Loaded Guns In Its Stores
Posted in the Sedro-Woolley Forum
#1 Jul 30, 2013
Snippet from CNN article (7/30/2013), "Starbucks, Loaded Guns, and Lattes":
"...Starbucks' refusal to ban guns from its stores has made it a nationwide venue for pro-gun rallies, where customers toting loaded weapons gather over coffee. There have even been accidental shootings: earlier this year a woman shot another customer when she dropped her purse and a loaded weapon inside discharged. A pro-gun site called I Love Guns and Coffee sells a coin that looks like the Starbucks logo, except the mermaid is wielding handguns. On Sunday, for example, 60 pro-gun activists carried handguns, semi-automatic rifles and shotguns into a Starbucks in Sioux Falls, South Dakota.
Starbucks claims its open carry policy simply follows state laws and local ordinances. However, the company is willing to overlook those in other instances; it recently announced a smoking ban within 25 feet of any store.
Why is Starbucks willing take a public health stand on smoking, but not gun violence, which kills more than 55 children and teens a week in America? Since when is second-hand smoke more dangerous than second-hand bullets?
Starbucks also claims that banning guns from its stores would put its employees in a "potentially unsafe position" if they had to ask a gun-wielding customer to leave. This alleged concern has not stopped other companies -- including Disney, California Pizza Kitchen, AMC Theaters, Toys R Us, and even Starbucks competitor Peet's Coffee & Tea -- from prohibiting guns in their stores in states where open carry is legal. In fact, these companies have banned guns in order to keep employees and customers safe.
Starbucks bans guns from its corporate headquarters in Seattle, where open carry is perfectly legal. This same protection should be afforded to the millions of unarmed customers Starbucks serves each week.
An overwhelming majority of Americans want common-sense gun reforms. But it's not just Congress and state legislatures that impact society; business policies also affect our safety. Shame on Congress for failing to act, but that's no excuse for companies like Starbucks to fail to lead...."
---Interesting....hadn't known that about Starbucks. The article is thought provoking no matter how one views the issue.
#2 Jul 30, 2013
Those are good points about Starbucks corporate headquarters banning guns but not in their stores, and citing local laws about guns but not about smoking. Shows inconsistency.
Add your comments below
|cult reportedly in Sedro-Wooley (Jun '10)||Aug 25||Jeff Sjolander||66|
|WA Who do you support for U.S. Senate in Washingto... (Oct '10)||Aug 19||Mr Blue||713|
|World Champion Sonnon advocates for dyslexia ed...||Aug 18||Seth Ashford||1|
|US Bicycle Route 10 is approved for Washington ...||Aug 17||Great||4|
|Covington seeks funding for LED lights||Aug 7||Shelly Slader||1|
|AA and False Guilt||Jul '14||Bruce Deile||19|
|Review: Flipside Performance (May '13)||Jul '14||Nino Brown||7|
Find what you want!
Search Sedro-Woolley Forum Now