Former owner of Sedona Choppers seek ...

Former owner of Sedona Choppers seek $1.2 million in lawsuit against Remax Sedona and related party

There are 89 comments on the www.sedona.biz story from Dec 24, 2007, titled Former owner of Sedona Choppers seek $1.2 million in lawsuit against Remax Sedona and related party. In it, www.sedona.biz reports that:

A recent lawsuit filed by Robert Wasserman and his partner Clarisse Heller on 12/04/2007 in the Coconino County Superior Court demonstrates how the recently completed Uptown construction project and a new competitor next door possibly had serious human and business consequences; and also the potential pitfalls of a dual broker real estate relationship.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.sedona.biz.

First Prev
of 5
Next Last
Jed Clampit

Rye, NY

#95 Jul 25, 2009
Count Da Money wrote:
Seems to me to be a crybaby, not getting his own way.
There are many gas stations on 3 corners of an intersection.
There are many restaurants close to each other.
And so on. Nobody can regulate your competition.
Office buildings with many doctors in it, and many lawyers in it do just fine. They don't sue the Realtor because competition starts up nearby.
So a couple of New York Jews move West and are afraid of competition, so what do New York Jews usually do? They sue.

****
typical racist comment.. maybe if you owned some shoes and left the the hills you would have something relevant to say, but i doubt it ***
Jed Clampit

Rye, NY

#96 Jul 25, 2009
typical racist comment.. maybe if you owned some shoes and left the the hills you would have something relevant to say, but i doubt it *** I didn't know "people like you" could even read or write. but hey maybe you had a jewish school teacher
Jed Clampit

Rye, NY

#97 Jul 25, 2009
Count Da Money wrote:
If you are not smart enough to have your own broker, then you deserve what you get.
The seller's broker does not work for the buyer.
The buyer needs their own broker- and lawyer.
The problem is not about the broker anyway, it is about competition in the same field. Nobody can stop competition. If your competition beats you in your field, that's too bad. That's business.
The broker should not be sued, but the New York Jews don't know anything except sueing whoever they can.
Their store called "Sedona Choppers" only sold clothing and accessories. The other store sold motorcycles, plus clothing and accessories.
+++ typical racist comment.. maybe if you owned some shoes and left the the hills you would have something relevant to say, but i doubt it +++
Jed Clampit

Rye, NY

#98 Jul 25, 2009
If you are not smart enough to have your own broker, then you deserve what you get.
The seller's broker does not work for the buyer.
The buyer needs their own broker- and lawyer.
The problem is not about the broker anyway, it is about competition in the same field. Nobody can stop competition. If your competition beats you in your field, that's too bad. That's business.
The broker should not be sued, but the New York
Jews don't know anything except sueing whoever
they can.
+++ typical racist comment.. maybe if you owned some shoes and left the the hills you would have something relevant to say, but i doubt it +++
Jed Clampit

Rye, NY

#99 Jul 25, 2009
+++ typical racist comment.. maybe if you owned some shoes and left the the hills you would have something relevant to say, but i doubt it +++
Robert Wasserman

Sedona, AZ

#100 Aug 16, 2009
Jury clearly didnt get the point... Remax admits to charges, their expert agrees with us, our expert agrees with us, in fact they even admit to it in court under oath and in their closing arguments

JNOV Being Filed

We have filed a Motion Not withstanding the verdict because they admitted under oath they committed the offense, violating the regulation, a sort of confession, and because of this the jury decision can be over turned if the judge sees fit. After trial interviews clearly show the jury was incorrectly instructed, we are asking for the verdict to be overturned.
Robert Wasserman

Sedona, AZ

#101 Aug 16, 2009
"A JNOV is appropriate only if the judge determines that no reasonable jury could have reached the given verdict. For example, if a party enters no evidence on an essential element of their case, and the jury still finds in their favor, the court may rule that no reasonable jury would have disregarded the lack of evidence on that key point and reform the judgment."
JNOV for Sedona Choppers

Sedona, AZ

#102 Aug 22, 2009
From the definition of JNOV below and link the entire Motion

"A JNOV is appropriate only if the judge determines that no reasonable jury could have reached the given verdict. For example, if a party enters no evidence on an essential element of their case, and the jury still finds in their favor, the court may rule that no reasonable jury would have disregarded the lack of evidenceon that key point and reform the judgment."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JNOV

Judge due to Rule within 30 Days
Not Guilty

Atlanta, GA

#104 Jun 3, 2012
ReMax Sedona and Related Party found Not Guilty by a jury.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 5
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Sedona Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Considering relocating to Sedona..what's it lik... (Dec '08) Aug 27 bob frapples 244
What is causing Cottonwood's Cancer (Nov '09) Aug 25 John 50
Review: JJS Computer Corporation (Apr '14) Aug 20 Jim 8
best Vortex Site In Sedona Aug 3 bob frapples 2
Internet Providers in Cottonwood Aug 3 Lostone1413 1
News New Verde Valley resident experiences hiking tr... Jul '15 Lori 1
Flash Flood Watch Today In Sedona Jul '15 HostSedona 1
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Sedona Mortgages