Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 | Posted by: Topix | Full story: www.cnn.com

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Comments (Page 9,889)

Showing posts 197,761 - 197,780 of199,067
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#228770
Feb 3, 2014
 

Judged:

1

Xavier Breath wrote:
<quoted text>
ahhahahaha
hahahahaahha
STOP THAT! Now pull up your pants and wash you hands.
Foil wrapped

San Dimas, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#228771
Feb 3, 2014
 

Judged:

1

No sweeties here anymore,#22769 - you ate them all, remember?
Foil wrapped

San Dimas, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#228773
Feb 3, 2014
 
No sweeties here anymore,#22772 - you ate them all, remember?
Xavier Breath

Hoboken, NJ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#228774
Feb 3, 2014
 
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
How does "in California, marriage is a man and a woman" explicitly exclude same sex marriage but only implicitly exclude polygamy?
Please answer reasonably like a big boy. The answer is not "Frankie's a drug addict" or "Frankie has PTSD from the war" etc.
Implicit vs explicit

The language used in Prop 8 does not legally satisfy banning polygamy. You can change the subject all you want, but the fact remains Prop 8 did not ban polygamy. It did ban gay couples from marrying, who previously had the right. Prop 8 went down. Gay couples can marry again.

Before Prop 8, no polygamy
After Prop 8 no polygamy.

I think it's HILARIOUS that you continue to make ridiculous arguments about "a man and a woman" means no polygamy, when we are talking about LAW! HILARIOUS! It must be explicit to ban behavior. Ask your Magic 8 Ball.
Foil wrapped

San Dimas, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#228775
Feb 3, 2014
 
No sweeties here anymore #22874 - you ate them all yesterday.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#228777
Feb 3, 2014
 

Judged:

1

1

1

rabnew wrote:
<quoted text>
In my spare time I research Japanese war crimes dealing with the Sth West Pacific area....have done for years. Was wondering if you'd be up for some Q&A via PM...
I am not allowed to register. I am not as equal as others and cannot PM you.
Foil wrapped

San Dimas, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#228778
Feb 3, 2014
 
No sweeties here anymore #228777 - you ate them all yesterday. Besides they are fattening.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#228779
Feb 3, 2014
 
Xavier Breath wrote:
<quoted text>
I think it's HILARIOUS that you continue to make ridiculous arguments about "a man and a woman" means no polygamy...
It does. I think you have a strange sense of humor.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#228780
Feb 3, 2014
 
rabnew wrote:
<quoted text>
In my spare time I research Japanese war crimes dealing with the Sth West Pacific area....have done for years. Was wondering if you'd be up for some Q&A via PM...
I would love to talk with you about WWII in the Pacific, my father and all my uncles are veterans of it. I was married to a Filipina and have heard many stories of the Japanese occupation from her people. I lived in Japan in 1969-1970 with my Japanese girlfriend whose father, like mine, was a combat veteran, just on the other side and have heard his stories over many beers. The irony, right? I wrote my father about this he said he wished he could be there he held no grudge.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#228781
Feb 3, 2014
 
Xavier Breath wrote:
<quoted text>
Implicit vs explicit
The language used in Prop 8 does not legally satisfy banning polygamy. You can change the subject all you want, but the fact remains Prop 8 did not ban polygamy. It did ban gay couples from marrying, who previously had the right. Prop 8 went down. Gay couples can marry again.
Before Prop 8, no polygamy
After Prop 8 no polygamy.
I think it's HILARIOUS that you continue to make ridiculous arguments about "a man and a woman" means no polygamy, when we are talking about LAW! HILARIOUS! It must be explicit to ban behavior. Ask your Magic 8 Ball.
How does "A man and a woman" explicitly ban same sex marriage but only implicitly ban polygamy?

If there were no law against polygamy and prop 8 wasn't struck down would polygamy be allowed in CA?

Does a man and a woman mean three men? Does it mean a man and two women?
Wipe free

San Dimas, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#228783
Feb 3, 2014
 
This topic is like a dripping utter.
garbonzo

Long Beach, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#228784
Feb 3, 2014
 
rabnew wrote:
<quoted text>
Good! Now fart off!
rude
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#228785
Feb 3, 2014
 
Wipe free wrote:
This topic is like a dripping utter.
You are like a festering boil on this topic. Oozing puss.
Wipe free

San Dimas, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#228786
Feb 3, 2014
 
This stinking topic is like a dripping utter.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#228787
Feb 3, 2014
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Wipe free wrote:
This stinking topic is like a dripping utter.
WTF is a "dripping utter" dummy?
garbonzo

Long Beach, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#228788
Feb 3, 2014
 

Judged:

1

1

1

um yeah whatever.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#228789
Feb 3, 2014
 

Judged:

1

1

1

garbonzo wrote:
um yeah whatever.
Well said. And 100% spot on.
Xavier Breath

Hoboken, NJ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#228790
Feb 4, 2014
 
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
If there were no law against polygamy and prop 8 wasn't struck down would polygamy be allowed in CA?
But there IS a law against polygamy, Flunkie. Reality.... check into it. Stop with the ridiculous 'what if' arguments.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#228791
Feb 4, 2014
 
Xavier Breath wrote:
<quoted text>
But there IS a law against polygamy, Flunkie. Reality.... check into it. Stop with the ridiculous 'what if' arguments.
Stop with your ridiculous argument that "a woman" means many women.
Xavier Breath

Hoboken, NJ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#228792
Feb 4, 2014
 
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Stop with your ridiculous argument that "a woman" means many women.
Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

It's over, Flunkie.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 197,761 - 197,780 of199,067
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••
•••
•••

Seaside Jobs

•••
•••
•••

Seaside People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••