'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate

Oct 1, 2010 | Posted by: Top Mod2 | Full story: thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com

"Fox News Sunday" is heading to Louisville, Ky. Jack Conway, Kentucky's attorney general and the Democratic candidate for Senate , and Rand Paul, the Republican nominee and son of Representative Ron Paul, Republican of Texas, have agreed to a live debate on "Fox News Sunday" on Oct.3 at 9 a.m. (Eastern time).

Comments
95,401 - 95,420 of 151,117 Comments Last updated 57 min ago

“Could've been a contender here”

Since: Apr 13

I couldn't find no fight, here

#107726 Jul 2, 2013
Aristocles son of Ariston wrote:
<quoted text>
Is that your life ambition?
Carry on pedantic pretender, carry on.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =2X_2IdybTV0XX
sure as hell don't want to be a fireman. That burns.

I would like to sit at my computer and pretend I know everything, but I don't want to take your job

I guess it's pornstar.

“Could've been a contender here”

Since: Apr 13

I couldn't find no fight, here

#107727 Jul 2, 2013
Jay wrote:
<quoted text>
**********
Air Force One and the menagerie that goes with him is probably one of the biggest carbon footprints on the planet, one way. And what about Pelosi when she flew back and forth to California when she was speaker? One small woman and one huge jet?
How many cars on the road equal one Obama vacation in distributing carbons into the atmosphere?
And why does Al Gore and his wife need a 29,000 square foot house lit from top to bottom?
That's only the tip of the iceberg, too.
Midol, Jay, for that time of the month

do republicans really believe in carbon?

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#107728 Jul 2, 2013
Injudgement wrote:
<quoted text>The problem with the Repub's talking point about Obama increasing the US debt to $17 Trillion is that it is a lie. Obama has cut the deficit spending in half of what it was. Obama has spent LESS than any President in the past 50 years.
What you Repubs have is a problem with math.
Bush handed Obama the nations credit card and ONLY enough income to pay the reoccurring monthly bills and interest on it. That's why it is now $17 Trillion and will double in 10 years. How'd those Bush tax cuts work out for America. The Repubs in DC protected the rich and now we can't pay the bills.
Obama most definitely increased the US debt to over $17 trillion. You need to understand the difference between the deficit and debt. Just because the deficit is reduced doesn't mean the debt is not continuing to increase. We continue to spend more than we are taking in.
----------

--- "Deficit" vs. "Debt"---

Suppose you spend more money this month than your income. This situation is called a "budget deficit". So you borrow (ie; use your credit card). The amount you borrowed (and now owe) is called your debt. You have to pay interest on your debt. If next month you spend more than your income, another deficit, you must borrow some more, and you'll still have to pay the interest on your debt (now larger). If you have a deficit every month, you keep borrowing and your debt grows. Soon the interest payment on your loan is bigger than any other item in your budget. Eventually, all you can do is pay the interest payment, and you don't have any money left over for anything else. This situation is known as bankruptcy.

http://www.federalbudget.com/

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#107729 Jul 2, 2013
Injudgement wrote:
<quoted text>I will try an do this without calling you stupid. The entire data collection just sits there. No one goes through your calls, emails or files. Now if you had been on the phone with say Ben Laden or the Boston bombers than those records are pulled from the data. That is how it works. If you don't believe this than please tell us all how many government employees it takes to read and listen to the billions made PER DAY?
Problem is that even with ALL the information they gather and specific information from Russia, they couldn't identify the Boston bombers. The FBI had even interviewed the deceased brother and they put out their pictures for the public to identify. Great work!

"The entire data collection just sits there". What happens if you are a conservative or a liberal who is targeted at some point? They have all this information on "John Doe" and can pull it at that point and time and use it against him. Do you want the government to know every person you call and every person who calls you? Do you want them to know private information in your email, etc.?

If I felt sure ALL of the information would just "sit there", I would not have as much of a problem with it. If it CAN be used against people in the future, it is a VERY scary matter. The government having access to specific and private information regarding everyone's lives is VERY scary.

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#107731 Jul 2, 2013
Injudgement wrote:
<quoted text>Did you get the memo about all the programs have been in place since 2006 with the first one in 2003? But that's just what hypocritical Repubs do.
The FBI has dramatically increased its use of a controversial provision of the Patriot Act to secretly obtain a vast store of business records of U.S. citizens under President Barack Obama, according to recent Justice Department reports to Congress.

“That they were using this (provision) to do mass collection of data is definitely the biggest surprise,” said Robert Chesney, a top national security lawyer at the University of Texas Law School.“Most people who followed this closely were not aware they were doing this. We’ve gone from producing records for a particular investigation to the production of all records for a massive pre-collection database. It’s incredibly sweeping.”

But little-noticed statements by FBI Director Robert Mueller in recent years – as well as interviews with former senior law enforcement officials – hint at what Chesney calls a largely unnoticed “sea change” in the way the U.S. government collects data for terrorism and other national security investigations.

http://investigations.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/...

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#107732 Jul 2, 2013
Calvin_Coolish wrote:
<quoted text>
what do you shove up your butt? your head? good trick, but try walking a tightrope across the Little Colorado River Gorge at the same time...and without a net
that'll be a good trick.
The problem with the internet is that it can be very addictive and a complete time waster. People with too much time on their hands can waste a ridiculous amount of hours just browsing and surfing the internet. Eventually the individual is going to need some drama or stimulation. Hey why not randomly attack someone? See if I can get a rise out of them? These sort of people leave mean comments mostly for their own amusement.

http://voices.yahoo.com/reasons-why-people-le...
Brad

Manchester, CT

#107733 Jul 2, 2013
Republican Honey wrote:
<quoted text>
Problem is that even with ALL the information they gather and specific information from Russia, they couldn't identify the Boston bombers. The FBI had even interviewed the deceased brother and they put out their pictures for the public to identify. Great work!
"The entire data collection just sits there". What happens if you are a conservative or a liberal who is targeted at some point? They have all this information on "John Doe" and can pull it at that point and time and use it against him. Do you want the government to know every person you call and every person who calls you? Do you want them to know private information in your email, etc.?
I agree,and then some.
I believe the public is just starting to realize how advanced this information gathering technology has become over the last 10 years or so.
I think the Government has enough information already to pretty much single people out and exploit them in dam near any way they see fit.
The last year alone has changed the entire scope of the consequences elections will have in the present,not the future,cause its already here in that regard.
countrygirl

Hopkinsville, KY

#107734 Jul 2, 2013
Concerned wrote:
<quoted text>
It's the 2nd of the month. She got her check yesterday and probably OD'ed on crack. I'm worried for her.
funny!!
Little Things

Princeton, KY

#107735 Jul 2, 2013
Heavy

“Could've been a contender here”

Since: Apr 13

I couldn't find no fight, here

#107736 Jul 2, 2013
Republican Honey wrote:
<quoted text>
The problem with the internet is that it can be very addictive and a complete time waster. People with too much time on their hands can waste a ridiculous amount of hours just browsing and surfing the internet. Eventually the individual is going to need some drama or stimulation. Hey why not randomly attack someone? See if I can get a rise out of them? These sort of people leave mean comments mostly for their own amusement.
http://voices.yahoo.com/reasons-why-people-le...
yea, she's a hateful bitch...and she calls herself a lady
JBH

Richmond, Canada

#107737 Jul 2, 2013
-------
Snowden releases a new public statement through Wikileaks

For decades the United States of America has been one of the strongest defenders of the human right to seek asylum. Sadly, this right, laid out and voted for by the U.S. in Article 14 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, is now being rejected by the current government of my country. The Obama administration has now adopted the strategy of using citizenship as a weapon. Although I am convicted of nothing, it has unilaterally revoked my passport, leaving me a stateless person. Without any judicial order, the administration now seeks to stop me exercising a basic right. A right that belongs to everybody. The right to seek asylum.

In the end the Obama administration is not afraid of whistleblowers like me, Bradley Manning or Thomas Drake. We are stateless, imprisoned, or powerless. No, the Obama administration is afraid of you. It is afraid of an informed, angry public demanding the Constitutional government it was promised — and it should be.

I am unbowed in my convictions and impressed at the efforts taken by so many.

Edward Joseph Snowden

Monday 1st July 2013

http://intellihub.com/2013/07/01/statement-fr ...

----------

==========

US is not powerful today as it used to be and US could suffer critical damages by just pursuing the Snowden case.
As US is known around the world for spying and hacking, countries are alarmed that they start to over-watch US.

Countries will proceed with rules to penalize US engaging violations of making obstruction to their systems of value, including liberty freedom, jurisdictions and sovereign rights.

Many people around the globe would not protocol to US, while mistreatment and disfavor of US persons and symbols would go on, which could result the imposing enormous difficulties to US on world stage.

The world is uprising when more people will point fingers at US.

As they scold and eject US a lot these days, many countries increasingly criticize US.
At the same time by labeling it as being very bad and a very bad country for committing the extremism, the new world will reject and deter US more and more.

To break International Laws of many countries to get Snowden, will lead to many critical harms and very bad consequences of US.

*+++++

HERE IS AN EXAMPLE OF PEOPLE AROUND THE WORLD SCOLDING US:

Holg
Zerbst, Germany
Reply »|Report Abuse|Judge it!|#5412 hrs ago

it was well known for everybody at least for me that criminals from usa spy globally and everybody and spend fat billions from cash of tax payers for this purpose. Such spying networks like facebook is easy leader in this crime.
One thing is not to understand, why you as nation don´t protest. Your pseudodemocratical, criminal governments destroy countries by all these global wars by using your taxes, destroy your lives, destroy your economy and global economy and additionally spy everybody. When do you intend to make something against it? After this point when your schisoid governments confirm that this guy or that guy are state enemies and begin to liquidate you gradually one by one. It is now time to protest, to show that you have balls too.

Since: Feb 13

Location hidden

#107738 Jul 3, 2013
Republican Honey wrote:
<quoted text>
The famous “16 words” in President Bush’s Jan. 28, 2003 State of the Union address turn out to have a basis in fact after all, according to two recently released investigations in the US and Britain.
Bush said then,“The British Government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa .” Some of his critics called that a lie, but the new evidence shows Bush had reason to say what he did.
The "16 words" in Bush's State of the Union Address on Jan. 28, 2003 have been offered as evidence that the President led the US into war using false information intentionally. The new reports show Bush accurately stated what British intelligence was saying, and that CIA analysts believed the same thing.
The final word on the 16 words may have to await history's judgment. The Butler report's conclusion that British intelligence was "credible" clearly doesn't square with what US intelligence now believes. But these new reports show Bush had plenty of reason to believe what he said, even if British intelligence is eventually shown to be mistaken.
http://www.factcheck.org/bushs_16_words_on_ir...
The words no one ever heard from Bush was about the fact 15 of the 19 were citizens of Saudi Arabia. Iraq was just like all the wars since WWII. Just more lost of life and money for nothing. No war since WWII has ever been to protect America.
Uncle Tab

United States

#107739 Jul 3, 2013
Aristocles son of Ariston wrote:
Dammit [hearsay] not "here say" or there say auto correct must be FUBAR today!
You could proof read before you post instead of reading AFTER you post then being so ashamed of your lack of ability in spelling.

It's hilarious every time you fuckup them correcting it (well, the ones you catch, there are many you don't catch) its great how that education made you such a great poster.

Your grades really must suffer from your MANY simple spelling mistakes. But you proofread all of that but nothing here?

Love pointing out that make believe education LMAO
Concerned

Scranton, PA

#107740 Jul 3, 2013
RepubliCONS wrote:
<quoted text>
I'd have to agree with Injudgement, "drug induced sleep". I would hate to think she was around little children. That is a frightening thought. Can you imagine the stories she would tell? haha
DITCH MITCH 2014
You're the model Kool-Aid drinker, aren't you?
Uncle Tab

United States

#107741 Jul 3, 2013
Calvin_Coolish wrote:
<quoted text>
I grade 19th grader's essays.
ROTFLMAO!
Uncle Tab

United States

#107742 Jul 3, 2013
Aristocles son of Ariston wrote:
<quoted text>
I single finger speed-
type while flipping you off with another!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =iSN4Feot5iIXX
Explains your terrible 29th grade spelling
Concerned

Scranton, PA

#107743 Jul 3, 2013
Uncle Tab wrote:
<quoted text>
You could proof read before you post instead of reading AFTER you post then being so ashamed of your lack of ability in spelling.
It's hilarious every time you fuckup them correcting it (well, the ones you catch, there are many you don't catch) its great how that education made you such a great poster.
Your grades really must suffer from your MANY simple spelling mistakes. But you proofread all of that but nothing here?
Love pointing out that make believe education LMAO
"It's hilarious every time you fuckup them correcting it ..." them?
"... its great how that education made you such a great poster. its?
Thanks for the spelling lesson!:)
Uncle Tab

Chicago, IL

#107744 Jul 3, 2013
Republican Honey wrote:
<quoted text>
The problem with the internet is that it can be very addictive and a complete time waster. People with too much time on their hands can waste a ridiculous amount of hours just browsing and surfing the internet. Eventually the individual is going to need some drama or stimulation. Hey why not randomly attack someone? See if I can get a rise out of them? These sort of people leave mean comments mostly for their own amusement.
http://voices.yahoo.com/reasons-why-people-le...
Hey, your parents used the TV to babysit you, so let my parents continue to use the internet for me.

Since: Feb 13

Location hidden

#107745 Jul 3, 2013
Brad wrote:
<quoted text>
I agree,and then some.
I believe the public is just starting to realize how advanced this information gathering technology has become over the last 10 years or so.
I think the Government has enough information already to pretty much single people out and exploit them in dam near any way they see fit.
The last year alone has changed the entire scope of the consequences elections will have in the present,not the future,cause its already here in that regard.
Repubs once again find themselves in the minority. The US government is storing all phone and email info. It can only be seen or used when something like 9/11 or the Boston bombing happens. The records of who was in contact with a terrorist, by court order, can then be looked into. The majority of Americans believe this to be a good idea.

Since: Feb 13

Location hidden

#107746 Jul 3, 2013
Republican Honey wrote:
<quoted text>
Obama most definitely increased the US debt to over $17 trillion. You need to understand the difference between the deficit and debt. Just because the deficit is reduced doesn't mean the debt is not continuing to increase. We continue to spend more than we are taking in.
----------
--- "Deficit" vs. "Debt"---
Suppose you spend more money this month than your income. This situation is called a "budget deficit". So you borrow (ie; use your credit card). The amount you borrowed (and now owe) is called your debt. You have to pay interest on your debt. If next month you spend more than your income, another deficit, you must borrow some more, and you'll still have to pay the interest on your debt (now larger). If you have a deficit every month, you keep borrowing and your debt grows. Soon the interest payment on your loan is bigger than any other item in your budget. Eventually, all you can do is pay the interest payment, and you don't have any money left over for anything else. This situation is known as bankruptcy.
http://www.federalbudget.com/
Like I said before. How'd those Bush tax cuts work out for America?

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Scottsville Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
KY What's mitch McConnell done for coal, when ther... 28 min Mitch 1,282
what did Mickey Atwood do to get fired?? 2 hr old timer 21
Kristin 10 hr RoamingInsomniac 10
Union at Smuckers (Jun '09) 10 hr RoamingInsomniac 110
Pizza Hutt 10 hr who cares 6
1881 on main 16 hr RoamingInsomniac 2
KY Paul vs Conway: The Nastiest Debate Of 2010 | T... (Oct '10) 19 hr Reality 16,145
•••
•••

Scottsville Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Scottsville People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Scottsville News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Scottsville
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••