So, she sees this incident six months before she kills Alexander and she never calls police nor mentions this to any other human being? She sees this six months before she kills her lover, who she continues to have sex with, engaging in taking graphic photographs of him, even though she is aware of this deviance? She goes and speaks with Mormon clergy and is concerned about the trip Alexander was taking with another woman, but fails to mention this sin, which is also against the law? She never testified to any type of sexual abuse as a child. She testified that she was "used for sex", after participating in sex acts less than a week into meeting this stranger. How does someone "groom" an experienced adult woman, who had multiple sexual relationships with other men, in under 72 hours? Why did she continue with the relationship if she felt ungratified with the treatment and sex right from the beginning? How was she not bothered by the pedophilia, not having had a childhood past associated with such abuse that might have "normalized" these actions? How was she able to extract herself from prior relationships that never met this level of depravity? Why did she travel miles to see him, borrowing money to do so, when she didn't rely on him financially and was out of harm's way, in another state, where he was not pursuing her, and then have relations once again upon arrival? Why have the police not found a cache of images on his computer as is typically recovered in pedophilia cases? Why haven't the police found any reliable instances of Alexander attempting to position himself in circumstances with proximity to children, like interacting online with boys, coaching, or some other such activity, like Sandusky, for example? Why would Alexander be grooming Arias if she wasn't the mother of a young child? Why did he keep the relationship with her on the DL (according to Arias), if he was really attracted to boys; why wouldn't he have done so with a mother of boys instead of a woman with breast implants, who was described by other heterosexual men as the archetypal feminine ideal of being sexually alluring?
Is this another fantastical tale like the murderous ninjas? If contrived, this is so cold and callously calculating, that the risk for danger to the public is very real, if she is ever released from prison. I suppose I will need to hear or read about her testimony, but so far, much of what she has said so far is not credible because she is a proven liar who has made up at least three separate stories in an attempt to absolve herself of responsibility.
Perhaps this is merely an attempt at mitigation to avoid the death penalty, but a clear appearance of remorse would have gone a longer way rather than muddying up the victim. She may be digging her own grave with this testimony, and I'd rather see her sentenced to LWOP, if found guilty.