Obama and Clinton signed on to new U...

Obama and Clinton signed on to new UN Gun Ban talks at the UN March 18-28,'13.

Posted in the Savannah Forum

First Prev
of 5
Next Last
Constitution Joe

Morristown, TN

#1 Nov 8, 2012
Just received an email in forming me of this!!! The email is kinda long, but here is some of what my informant said!!!

Dear xxxxx,

Less than 12 hours after winning re-election, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton signed on to new UN Gun Ban talks at the United Nations March 18-28, 2013.

But I'm afraid Obama and Clinton won't even wait until next March to start trying to ram through new gun control.

You see, when the lame duck session of Congress starts next Tuesday, many anti-gun elected officials just ousted from their seats will have an axe to grind ...

... and nothing to lose.

Not only that, but Members of Congress know most Americans -- exhausted from the recent election -- won't be paying attention.

It's a perfect opportunity for anti-gunners like Harry Reid, Dianne Feinstein and Chuck Schumer to cut anti-gun deals and get home for the holidays while very few are watching.

The UN Gun Ban, a new permanent "Assault Weapons Ban," or even ammo and magazine bans will ALL be on the table when Congress reconvenes during the lame duck.

That's why I'm mobilizing 1.4-million members and supporters RIGHT NOW in opposition to ALL attempts to foist gun control on the American people during the lame duck session.

But even if you and I fight back and stop gun grabs like the UN Gun Ban during the lame duck, we'll be facing another major showdown battle over our gun rights at the United Nations in just a few short months.

After our million-member army stalled the "Small Arms Treaty" Conference this summer, the institutional gun lobby prematurely declared victory.

But less than five weeks later, petty tyrants at the UN rammed the UN Gun Ban through the Programme Against Small Arms meeting.

These new "International Small Arms Control Standards" are a nightmare of third-world gun control demands.

And the gun control zombies at the UN are crowing that this is exactly what they need to finally pass the "Small Arms Treaty."

Only this time, they've got the partially-completed treaty AND the UN Programme's new Small Arms Control Standards to use as a baseline -- and a President not worried about re-election.
Constitution Joe

Morristown, TN

#2 Nov 8, 2012
Continued,

Just a quick review of the UN Programme's new Small Arms Control Standards is enough to make my skin crawl.

This is nothing less than full-bore registration, confiscation and destruction:
*** Begin "marking small arms and light weapons and keeping accurate and easily retrievable records of them;"

*** Create "an appropriate weapons collection or registration strategy;"

*** Identify "groups holding small arms and/or light weapons and their age/gender profiles, the types and number of weapons held;"

*** Determine "capacity for destruction, including required improvements to equipment and procedures."

Worse, as we've seen in the past, the Programme Against Small Arms can be directly implemented via Executive Order -- without a single vote in Congress.

And that's just the tip of the iceberg.

Even without a completed "Small Arms Treaty," gun-grabbers are gearing up to DEMAND that Congress pass the new Arms Control standards because the U.S. is a member of the UN Programme of Action Against Small Arms!
Constitution Joe

Morristown, TN

#3 Nov 8, 2012
Continued,

The gun-grabbers in the UN Programme Against Small Arms, including Hillary Clinton's State Department, aren't to be taken lightly.

Since it's creation in 2001, this anti-gun UN organization has established itself as the archenemy of law-abiding gun owners here in the U.S.

In fact, many of the most recent anti-gun schemes here in the U.S. can be traced back to the Programme.

Obama's Historic Gun Ban to destroy more than one million WWII M1 Garands, M1 Carbines and Colt 1911 pistols is linked to the Programme.

Eric Holder's corrupt "Fast and Furious" operation -- according to public State Department reports to the United Nations -- is a direct implementation of the UN Programme of Action Against Small Arms.

In the report, Hillary's State Department almost sounded proud of the murder and mayhem caused by their reckless actions.

Now they want the full UN Gun Ban, and I'm afraid they're looking at this lame duck session of Congress -- right now -- as their best opportunity yet.

With the election has come and gone, gun-grabbers think most Americans won't be paying attention to what happens in Washington, D.C.

And the fact that Members of Congress will be even more anxious than usual to "compromise" away our gun rights so they can go home makes next week's lame duck session of Congress a recipe for disaster.

With President Obama's first action after being re-elected already on the books, you and I know gun control is on his mind.

He's emboldened like never before seeking to cement an anti-gun legacy with his left-wing cronies.

And tossing a bone to his anti-gun comrades is the one glaring omission stopping him from going down in history as the most radical liberal President ever with his elitist pals.
crack head

Tullahoma, TN

#4 Nov 9, 2012
Good luck taking away Guns from Americans. May be many shots heard around the world if any government starts going from home to home trying to take the guns away from Americans. Will be a said day making it's place in history. Americans will not stand for that tom foolery, but hey guess anything possible if they give me a free phone.....Americans better keep a close eye on our Washington leaders you think. Bottom line Guns don't kill,but stupid people with gun's do kill, just as drunk drivers do. So next I guess all cars will be removed from America, or maybe back to prohibition of alcohol once again?
Geez

Summerville, GA

#5 Nov 9, 2012
I highly doubt the validity of this. It makes no sense.......People shouldn't take random bits of information as the truth.
blown & juiced

United States

#6 Nov 9, 2012
Geez wrote:
I highly doubt the validity of this. It makes no sense.......People shouldn't take random bits of information as the truth.
Wow, every post you don't like or disagree with you always try and turn it around on them by say "it makes no sense". Why is that?
Constitution Joe

Morristown, TN

#7 Nov 9, 2012
Geez wrote:
I highly doubt the validity of this. It makes no sense.......People shouldn't take random bits of information as the truth.
Please feel free to prove me wrong!!!
Geez

Summerville, GA

#8 Nov 9, 2012
Constitution Joe wrote:
<quoted text>
Please feel free to prove me wrong!!!
Please feel free to prove its so.......Yes it makes no sense......The President and the Secretary of State are going to the U.N. to overturn a constitutional amendment......nonsense.
Geez

Summerville, GA

#9 Nov 9, 2012
The USA is represented at all U.N. "talks".
come on

Nashville, TN

#10 Nov 9, 2012
you do not need an assault weapon to go hunting.
Your Worst Nightmare

United States

#11 Nov 9, 2012
come on wrote:
you do not need an assault weapon to go hunting.
Please do define a "assault weapon" for us. It's not a matter of "need" as you say and who are you to tell a hunter what his "need" is? My hunting rifle is a .308 it holds 6 shells I just bought a 15 round clip for it, still the same hunting rifle (gun). With your logic is it now a hunting rifle or a "assault weapon"? See how dumb the thinking is from the anti-gun folks.
Whitetrash Godfather

Summerville, GA

#12 Nov 9, 2012
Your Worst Nightmare wrote:
<quoted text>
Please do define a "assault weapon" for us. It's not a matter of "need" as you say and who are you to tell a hunter what his "need" is? My hunting rifle is a .308 it holds 6 shells I just bought a 15 round clip for it, still the same hunting rifle (gun). With your logic is it now a hunting rifle or a "assault weapon"? See how dumb the thinking is from the anti-gun folks.
I don't see the need for a 15 rd clip in a hunting rifle.......learn to shoot.
come on

Nashville, TN

#13 Nov 9, 2012
Your Worst Nightmare wrote:
<quoted text>
Please do define a "assault weapon" for us. It's not a matter of "need" as you say and who are you to tell a hunter what his "need" is? My hunting rifle is a .308 it holds 6 shells I just bought a 15 round clip for it, still the same hunting rifle (gun). With your logic is it now a hunting rifle or a "assault weapon"? See how dumb the thinking is from the anti-gun folks.
I'm talking military grade weapons.
you butt-hurt gun nust are all the same.
Your Worst Nightmare

United States

#14 Nov 9, 2012
come on wrote:
<quoted text>I'm talking military grade weapons.
you butt-hurt gun nust are all the same.
Which are?.30-06 ,7mm mag,.308 what more powerful that a .233(AR-15). The point you are trying to make is pointless, it makes you look foolish
Your Worst Nightmare

United States

#15 Nov 9, 2012
Whitetrash Godfather wrote:
<quoted text>I don't see the need for a 15 rd clip in a hunting rifle.......learn to shoot.
Great, another pointless post. Your logic makes you look foolish about something you know nothing about. You anti 2nd amendment RIGHTS folks are all the same. The Constitution says I have a RIGHT to KEEP and bare ARMS (guns). It's not up to you to tell me as a hunter my "needs" for guns, ammo and clips. You gotta bring more to the table that " learn to shoot better", Really, dam dude.
Just want to say

Lyman, SC

#16 Nov 9, 2012
Geez wrote:
I highly doubt the validity of this. It makes no sense.......People shouldn't take random bits of information as the truth.
If you dont want to take "Joe's" word for it just go the UN site itself and re read what "Joe" said. I googled "UN Programme's New Small Arms Control Standards". Also try UN Small Arms Ban. Why would you rather doubt someone's word without even checking on it?
I got the same email that Joe did. If people would have checked out any of the info going around about Obama he would not be POTUS for 2nd time. Obama voters have put the gun up to everybody's heads that did not vote for him. You truly do not know what you have done. The Blood of this nation is on everybodys hands who voted for the Traitor.
Just want to say

Lyman, SC

#17 Nov 9, 2012
Your Worst Nightmare wrote:
<quoted text>
Great, another pointless post. Your logic makes you look foolish about something you know nothing about. You anti 2nd amendment RIGHTS folks are all the same. The Constitution says I have a RIGHT to KEEP and bare ARMS (guns). It's not up to you to tell me as a hunter my "needs" for guns, ammo and clips. You gotta bring more to the table that " learn to shoot better", Really, dam dude.
But you also have a POTUS who views the Constitution as a guideline instead of the contract that guarantees our FREEDOMS, but Obama wipes his feet on it instead. Google "UN Programme to Control Small Arms". Sad day for the United States to put this Traitor back where he will continue to harm us.
Whitetrash Godfather

Summerville, GA

#18 Nov 9, 2012
Your Worst Nightmare wrote:
<quoted text>
Great, another pointless post. Your logic makes you look foolish about something you know nothing about. You anti 2nd amendment RIGHTS folks are all the same. The Constitution says I have a RIGHT to KEEP and bare ARMS (guns). It's not up to you to tell me as a hunter my "needs" for guns, ammo and clips. You gotta bring more to the table that " learn to shoot better", Really, dam dude.
I'm not against the 2nd amendment,I hunt myself,but the point is valid.....you have the right to have a 15 rd clip,but whats the use in multiple rounds for a rifle,it only makes true sportsmen look the part of villians.......and the word isn't "bare" ,shows what you know.
Whitetrash Godfather

Summerville, GA

#19 Nov 9, 2012
Your Worst Nightmare wrote:
<quoted text>
Great, another pointless post. Your logic makes you look foolish about something you know nothing about. You anti 2nd amendment RIGHTS folks are all the same. The Constitution says I have a RIGHT to KEEP and bare ARMS (guns). It's not up to you to tell me as a hunter my "needs" for guns, ammo and clips. You gotta bring more to the table that " learn to shoot better", Really, dam dude.
And how about I come and shove your gun rights up your ass,with my logic and my foot.
Your Worst Nightmare

United States

#20 Nov 9, 2012
Whitetrash Godfather wrote:
<quoted text>I'm not against the 2nd amendment,I hunt myself,but the point is valid.....you have the right to have a 15 rd clip,but whats the use in multiple rounds for a rifle,it only makes true sportsmen look the part of villians.......and the word isn't "bare",shows what you know.
Shows I hit the wrong key on my iPhone, so what's your point? So you hunt with a single-shot gun? I'm sure you don't but you don't want me carrying "multiple rounds" but you would, really? I hope your next point is better than this one. I'm not trying to bash or belittle you in any way it's just the word "assault weapon" is a code word from the left for gun ban. Assault weapons are any and all weapons.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 5
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Savannah Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Gross (Jun '15) 1 hr Gastric Gurglism 35
i hate mcdonalds in savannah tn (Dec '09) 1 hr Garrid Graydoody 55
Who is Randy Taylor? 2 hr Gray 9
Aristorenas Health Clinic 2 hr grammar police 7
just curious 4 hr Blah 6
skeeter buttram and Jessica jerrolds? 4 hr grammar police 17
cops on vine st. 7 hr Seen that 3

Savannah Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Savannah Mortgages