Judged:
1
1
1
Posted in the Santa Monica Forum
Comments (Page 330)
|
Judged: 1 1 1 |
|
|
Judged: 1 1 It would take the collusion of literally thousands of scientists, from multiple disciplines all over the world, along with the collusion of tens of thousands of research students, and hundreds of thousands of employees working in the field, and the collusion of NASA, the ESA, and countless academies, and both the democratic and republican parties, not to mention the parties of other nations. Calling it a hoax is funnier than people that believe the moon landings were faked ( another impossible hoax ) It takes an amazing level of gullibility to think that is a hoax |
|
|
Judged: 1 1 1 Another idiot from out of town has posted more "clod Farmer Bull" Get to the point hickObob. |
|
|
Judged: 1 1 |
|
|
Since: Nov 12
|
There are thousands of scientists that call it a hoax. Or should we call it fraud? In Global Warming Government sponsored studies the facts are predetermined. Big World Government could best lead (and control) us to a better world! They don't even call it Global warming anymore, its "climate change"....lol. Climate models are very complex, but they are imperfect and incomplete. We can barely predict the weather day to day but these alarmists want to paint a model of things that are not happening. Global warming has led many experts and scientists to distance themselves from the hysteria. The bottom line is always the same: The Global Warming Scam's true purpose is a power grab toward World Government. The book "Report from Iron Mountain" (Dial Press, 1967, New York) was one of the earliest studies on various crises to make a power grab, using other than World War as a method. People who understand this know that all of these methods use the Marx-Hegel Dialectic of Thesis-Antithesis-Synthesis, which is eminently successful. The more people understand this the less effective the Global Warming Scam will become. |
|
Since: Nov 12
|
Global warming causes snow and extra cold temps....lol....or bush. |
|
Judged: 1 1 1 |
|
|
Since: Nov 12
|
http://tucsoncitizen.com/wryheat/2012/11/20/g...
Dr. Norman Page says that “The earth is entering a cooling phase which is likely to last about 30 years and possibly longer.” What does Dr Bigot Dope think? |
|
Make my day
tell me that you don’t think that oil is a fossil fuel? |
|
|
Since: Nov 12
|
I don't really care, but it's debatable. A study published in Science Magazine today presents new evidence supporting the abiotic theory for the origin of oil, which asserts oil is a natural product the Earth generates constantly rather than a “fossil fuel” derived from decaying ancient forests and dead dinosaurs. The lead scientist on the study ? Giora Proskurowski of the School of Oceanography at the University of Washington in Seattle ? says the hydrogen-rich fluids venting at the bottom of the Atlantic Ocean in the Lost City Hydrothermal Field were produced by the abiotic synthesis of hydrocarbons in the mantle of the earth. You need to think outside of the old box. Science is always changing, it's not absolute. The time we sit back and stop thinking like you is when we don't advance. We used to think eating soy was healthy just a few years ago. Keep up with the times....loser! |
|
Since: Nov 12
|
Make my day tell me that you think that cold snowy weather is a sign of global warming? |
|
Thanks
We are done :D You should look into scientology :) right up your tree |
|
|
Since: Nov 12
|
I was done long time ago with you, you are an idiot that thinks science never changes. You should look into scientific journals. Like I said, I don't really care, but am open to a scientist saying different. Russian and Ukrainian scientists have produced an elegant proof that abiotic oil production (from intense pressure and high temperatures at least 100 kilometers below the earth's surface) is entirely consistent with the Second Law of Thermodynamics, but that no such proof has ever been put forth for the fossil fuel theory. In fact, he states that there is no “fossil fuel theory,” merely a hypothesis for which no proof has ever been set forth. |
|
No seriously we are done
I am not discussing actual science with a pseudoscience aficionado you don’t have enough information to talk on any science subject |
|
|
Since: Nov 12
|
No seriously we are done I am not discussing actual science with a pseudoscience aficionado you don’t have enough information to talk on any science subject...Science changes, you can try to insult me and talk big like you are the one and only expert, but by doing that you are calling people that are actual scientist that I posted from the same thing. People like Henrik Svensmark, and others. You even said all you do is take a telescope to schools and talk to little boys, you are the one that is an insult to science. Go eat some soy. Get some help! |
|
The number of sciences you have to ignore to believe what you choose to believe means you know nothing, of any sciences at all.
None of the wild beliefs you have, have passed the standards of peer review You have no idea how rigorous that is. The reason they have not passed is because they have never been submitted, and for good reason. You are being suckered by people making money on conspiracy theory enthusiasts |
|
|
Since: Nov 12
|
Hey old man, this is 2013, not 1970. Stop living in the past, times have changed. You talk big old man, but modern day scientist don't agree with your old fashion. I posted the names of the scientist, why don't you tell them they are nuts...lol...I hope when I get old that I won't be as stubborn and backwards as you. |
|
Since: Nov 12
|
"peer review" like politicians, government grants to prove a certain way, hollywood idiots...YOU! |
|
I am not discussing astronomy with an astrology nut
Seriously we are done, belief is not science, it takes actual evidence, things are put up for peer review so cross disciplinary sciences can weigh in on results. Nothing you are talking about has done that, it is shaman fooling the gullible, they are going after people that desperately want to believe something for religious or political reasons. They have hit their mark, you are stupid enough to buy this crap |
|
|
Since: Nov 12
|
This is global warming, not astronomy which as I'm sure you might know is finding new discoveries all the time. Like I said, why don't you tell people like Henrik Svensmark, who is a physicist and professor in the Division of Solar System Physics at the Danish National Space Institute in Copenhagen, that he is an idiot??? He has no religious or political reasons, but you nailed it. The studies are coming from Government studies that are predetermined. I have never heard my Church say anything about it. But I know you had to add that with your Bigotry. |
|
Tell me when this thread is updated: |
|
Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.
| Topic | Updated | Last By | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
57 min | Ex SBS | 56 |
|
|
59 min | RealityCheck ScottsValley | 11 |
|
|
1 hr | Frankie Rizzo | 168,436 |
|
|
2 hr | Kallark27 | 12,922 |
| Los Angeles, California Weather Forecast | 4 hr | Weather Forecast | 3 |
|
|
8 hr | UpAnDown | 4,028 |
|
|
9 hr | Heavy stuff | 1,438 |