92 F.3d 1031
Antonio J. BACA, in his capacity as personal representative
of the Estate of Josefa A. Baca, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Bruce KING, in his individual capacity; Sam King, doing
business as King Brothers Partnership, a New Mexico General
Partnership; Don King, doing business as King Brothers
Partnership, a New Mexico General Partnership; Bruce King,
doing business as King Brothers Partnership, a New Mexico
General Partnership; Manuel Lujan, in his individual
capacity; Bruce Babbitt, in his official capacity as the
Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior;
Larry Woodard, in his individual capacity; Monte Jordan, in
his official capacity as Acting New Mexico State Director of
the United States Bureau of Land Management; Albert Abee,
in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as
Area Manager of the Rio Puerco Resource Area of the United
States Bureau of Land Management, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 94-2237.
United States Court of Appeals,
Tenth Circuit.
Aug. 8, 1996.
Jeffrey J. Buckels, Albuquerque, New Mexico, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
John B. Pound of Herrera, Long & Pound, Santa Fe, New Mexico, for Appellees Bruce King, Sam King and Don King.
William B. Lazarus, Attorney, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.(Lois J. Schiffer, Assistant Attorney General, John J. Kelly, United States Attorney, and John W. Zavitz, Assistant United States Attorney, Albuquerque, New Mexico; Susan V. Cook and Robert L. Klarquist, Attorneys, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., with him, on the brief), for Appellees Manuel Lujan, Bruce Babbitt, Larry Woodard, Monte Jordan and Albert Abee.
Before HENRY, LIVELY* and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.
LIVELY, Circuit Judge.
1
In this appeal, the plaintiff seeks review, under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), 5 U.S.C.§§ 701-706 (1988), of a land exchange carried out by the Department of Interior's Bureau of Land Management (BLM). Specifically, he claims that the exchange violated the equal value requirement of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (FLPMA), 43 U.S.C.§ 1716(b)(1988). For the following reasons, we affirm the order of the district court