NONA

Santa Cruz, CA

#73 Apr 25, 2014
ANON wrote:
<quoted text>
Interesting article I would not have been aware of if not for you. Reading now. Thanks.
Says the sockpuppet on one hand to the sockpuppet on the other. If you'd keep your socks on your feet where they belong, you could have two more sockpuppets to engage in some futile illusion of a conversation with multiple parties. You could add a fifth a la Red Hot Chili Peppers should you need to stoke your ego even further.
jef helms

Belmont, CA

#74 Apr 25, 2014
TBSC Neo-Nazi Crew wrote:
Members of Take Back Santa Cruz are very similar to Neo-Nazis. Read this interview with a man who has been trolling Neo-Nazis in online forums and notice how similar the Neo-Nazi tactics are to the TBSC troll tactics.
Like the TBSC trolls on topix and CFABSC, the Neo-Nazis make repeated identity claims that are false.....
THIS GUY HAS BEEN TROLLING NEO-NAZIS FOR NEARLY A DECADE
http://www.vice.com/en_ca/read/this-guy-has-b...
"Last month, an extreme right-wing party called Australia First posted details online of the man they believed to be behind the pseudonym Andy Fleming. For the past decade, "Fleming" has been aggravating local neo-Nazis. They arenít particularly pleased. Heís received countless threats and racial abuse from them, which warrants his efforts to remain anonymous."
"VICE: How did you respond when you first saw the leak?
Andy Fleming: Itís not the first time these groups have misidentified me. There was one profile on my blog's Facebook page that was repeatedly making hostile comments. I kicked them off the page, and then the leak was uploaded on the Australia First website."
"I received an email from the misidentified man, who told me he was receiving some ominous calls and messages. I invited him onto my radio show to clarify things, but many of them still arenít buying it."
This is very similar to TBSC member "DBS" calling everyone who disagrees with him in online forums "John Colby" on topix and how the TBSC trolls in CFABSC are also doing that now.
The wannabe wet's scheming on the surf vacation and new vette, but they gotta act like fascists to get the cash--property racketeering and donations etc.----if they mention criminal behavior the "energy" goes towards the police dept. so they mention financial situations instead--that's where the money is.
jef helms

Belmont, CA

#75 Apr 25, 2014
then of course--their is the inevitable "death angel" ploy-with a financial money inadequacy hooker bolstering her prostitution by financial ostracizing the "homeless" with men feeding into it for sex intercourse after 5,000,000 other men.
ANON

Danville, CA

#76 Apr 25, 2014
NONA wrote:
When I was addicted to cocaine years ago I slang the hell out of dat shit and watched people lose their lives over it. You want cocaine, crack, meth, and those types of drugs legal? You're about as dumb as a f'ing rock. I know people that have committed suicide, homicide, lost their homes, their families, their brains, been locked up, gone to the funny farm in a padded cell, all because of hard drugs. Our housed and homeless people in this community are losing their a$$ every day, and you want the reason they've lost control to be legal. There are stupid people and then there are really stupid people, you're in the latter group.
YES. I want them Decriminalized not fully legalized so that people don't have to get stressed out and kill themselves or rob people for drugs when they are more affordable. The hard drugs can remain 'controlled' but FINES not FELONIES? get that? Why make MORE seriously labeled criminals over something so trivial????
jef helms

Oakland, CA

#77 Apr 26, 2014
ANON wrote:
<quoted text>
YES. I want them Decriminalized not fully legalized so that people don't have to get stressed out and kill themselves or rob people for drugs when they are more affordable. The hard drugs can remain 'controlled' but FINES not FELONIES? get that? Why make MORE seriously labeled criminals over something so trivial????
Ha!!, your forgetting that narcotics are addictive, people will just want a more stronger form of the drug and get more addicted etc.--more crime-deaths and violence and more heartbreaks etc.---legalization does not really work--look at the weed legalization now with "dab" and "wax" etc. or that taco chip looking stuff etc.--society can't really handle addictive substances =-that' why they are illegal

http://www.marijuana.com/news/2013/07/wax-on-...
jef helms

Oakland, CA

#79 Apr 26, 2014
ANON wrote:
<quoted text>
YES. I want them Decriminalized not fully legalized so that people don't have to get stressed out and kill themselves or rob people for drugs when they are more affordable. The hard drugs can remain 'controlled' but FINES not FELONIES? get that? Why make MORE seriously labeled criminals over something so trivial????
Aren't you the guy who lost his house to that new " crime on property " lean law-- where the west side community action groups said you and your kids were dealing?
NONA

Santa Cruz, CA

#80 Apr 26, 2014
ANON wrote:
<quoted text>
YES. I want them Decriminalized not fully legalized so that people don't have to get stressed out and kill themselves or rob people for drugs when they are more affordable. The hard drugs can remain 'controlled' but FINES not FELONIES? get that? Why make MORE seriously labeled criminals over something so trivial????
Well, I'm happy that my original post didn't go through because I spent a half an hour going off with personal life information regarding being an ex-addict and the things I've seen, done, and been.

Even Jeffie owns you in this argument. Get a clue!
NONA

Santa Cruz, CA

#81 Apr 26, 2014
ANON wrote:
<quoted text>
YES. I want them Decriminalized not fully legalized so that people don't have to get stressed out and kill themselves or rob people for drugs when they are more affordable. The hard drugs can remain 'controlled' but FINES not FELONIES? get that? Why make MORE seriously labeled criminals over something so trivial????
I think people that focus on marijuana decriminalization don't realize the effects of hard drugs. If you're pushing or using hard drugs, you deserve a felony. You are ruining lives and that is a serious crime deserving of a felony. I used to think the way you do, why ruin a persons life because they're involved in hard drugs because they're doing it to themselves, and then once I was sober I realized the absolute impact the sale and use of hard drugs has on everyone around that person. You cannot control a persons addiction, drug seeking behavior is rampant, it creates crime from bad decision making abilities. It's fully deserving of a serious label and it is not trivial, not at all. I know people that have committed suicide, homicide, rape, beat people so badly that they are disabled now, all from hard drug use. That is criminal in and of itself, you cannot control that with lighter sentences and fines. You're a god damn fool.
NONA

Santa Cruz, CA

#82 Apr 26, 2014
Man, this topic hits my heart and really upsets me.
jef helms

Oakland, CA

#83 Apr 26, 2014
NONA wrote:
Man, this topic hits my heart and really upsets me.
I don't know why you guys think financial situations are a problem etc.----that kind of fascist mentality will have the city managers etc. doing the "herky jerky rabbi dance-kent state mourn" real fast after a riot takes the gross profit aways for 3 years and the state and county employee lose their healthcare coverage and have to go to the medi-cal estate recovery plan--where they eventually become homeless and have financial difficulties.
jef helms

Oakland, CA

#84 Apr 26, 2014
NONA wrote:
<quoted text>
I think people that focus on marijuana decriminalization don't realize the effects of hard drugs. If you're pushing or using hard drugs, you deserve a felony. You are ruining lives and that is a serious crime deserving of a felony. I used to think the way you do, why ruin a persons life because they're involved in hard drugs because they're doing it to themselves, and then once I was sober I realized the absolute impact the sale and use of hard drugs has on everyone around that person. You cannot control a persons addiction, drug seeking behavior is rampant, it creates crime from bad decision making abilities. It's fully deserving of a serious label and it is not trivial, not at all. I know people that have committed suicide, homicide, rape, beat people so badly that they are disabled now, all from hard drug use. That is criminal in and of itself, you cannot control that with lighter sentences and fines. You're a god damn fool.
There are not enough services available to arrest and treat all the "drug users" , the authorities have to wean out the worse ones etc. and treat them etc.---and figure out who is going to cost the big medical bill and who is not---so the females get left out---females who use -don't usually make it--std's etc.
jef helms

Oakland, CA

#85 Apr 26, 2014
NONA wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, I'm happy that my original post didn't go through because I spent a half an hour going off with personal life information regarding being an ex-addict and the things I've seen, done, and been.
Even Jeffie owns you in this argument. Get a clue!
I'm the only one in my prop 36 group that has 10+ years pure etc. and I got sluffed off by racketeering groups , racketeering the social services and prop 36 funds. There was one other guy and he drank alcohol etc.---so I'm the only one--I did not get any social services--Beth shalom and Bnai moshe and some Pinoy got most of the social services etc.--and set up criminal organizations with the money. We could have tied in boulder creek into our sewer systems with the money etc.--what a waste. So what I'm trying to say-is even if the help and money is there---its not going to be distributed properly anyways.---Best to think and act for yourselves etc.
jef helms

Oakland, CA

#86 Apr 26, 2014
AND, most of the addicts that did get social services and housing-which were the medical cases etc.--hiv/hpv etc.---did not move around enough and died of heart failure etc. or OD's.
jef helms

Oakland, CA

#87 Apr 26, 2014
For your info--Beth shalom is a puerto rican hasidic entity---Bnai moshe is a peruvian incan asian hasidic entity and Pinoy is south east Asian--filipino-thai-malay sephardic hasidic entity.
TBSC Loons

Hayward, CA

#88 Apr 26, 2014
NONA wrote:
<quoted text>
I think people that focus on marijuana decriminalization don't realize the effects of hard drugs. If you're pushing or using hard drugs, you deserve a felony. You are ruining lives and that is a serious crime deserving of a felony. I used to think the way you do, why ruin a persons life because they're involved in hard drugs because they're doing it to themselves, and then once I was sober I realized the absolute impact the sale and use of hard drugs has on everyone around that person. You cannot control a persons addiction, drug seeking behavior is rampant, it creates crime from bad decision making abilities. It's fully deserving of a serious label and it is not trivial, not at all. I know people that have committed suicide, homicide, rape, beat people so badly that they are disabled now, all from hard drug use. That is criminal in and of itself, you cannot control that with lighter sentences and fines. You're a god damn fool.
You should turn yourself into the police then and serve the time you want others to serve.
DBS

Aptos, CA

#89 Apr 26, 2014
How's the job search going John?

Don't forget to tell Fried Twinkies that you are "Jewish Royalty"!!
TBSC Threats

Oakland, CA

#90 Apr 27, 2014
Yet another threat from TBSC member DBS.....

"Of course ColbyLOSER hasn't got the sack to meet anyone in person."

"He knows he'd get a beating "Worse than a rented Mule"!!"

http://www.topix.com/forum/city/santa-cruz-ca...

DBS's says his father was a WWII vet?

No way.
jef helms

Oakland, CA

#91 Apr 27, 2014
TBSC Loons wrote:
<quoted text>
You should turn yourself into the police then and serve the time you want others to serve.
I think there is a good part of tbsc--with good intentions--not the bad press tourism ruining property and donation racketeering entity. People trying to protect their community and families etc.---but legally---their are too many TBSC members with bad intentions.
John Colby

San Francisco, CA

#93 Apr 27, 2014
TBSC Threats wrote:
Yet another threat from TBSC member DBS.....
"Of course ColbyLOSER hasn't got the sack to meet anyone in person."
"He knows he'd get a beating "Worse than a rented Mule"!!"
http://www.topix.com/forum/city/santa-cruz-ca...
DBS's says his father was a WWII vet?
No way.
My ma and pa were in reality sis and bro! That didn't work for me and Pat :(
John Colby

San Francisco, CA

#94 Apr 27, 2014
John Colby wrote:
<quoted text>
My ma and pa were in reality sis and bro! That didn't work for me and Pat :(
Though not for lack of trying,,,,

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Santa Cruz Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
3 cheers for Robert Norse (Jun '13) 5 hr brbfreak420 245
Indoor block party aims to create sense of Sant... 9 hr The Truth Hurts 3
Name one Colby allegation that was proven true.... 10 hr ANON 34
5 things to know about the tea party movement (Apr '10) 17 hr barefoot2626 4,979
Aryan Nations recruiting again in northern Idaho (Apr '09) Sun Commander Bunny 372
Santa Cruz Legends- Sat Suffer as 2 1
Santa Cruz IndyBay (Aug '13) Sat anon 221
Santa Cruz Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Santa Cruz People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 3:36 am PST