#1 Aug 5, 2014
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2014 20:45:34 -0700
Subject: What is the SCPDs policy about cop-watching?
From: john.roncohen.colby [at] gmail.com
Dear Chief Vogel:
I am writing to serve you notice that the Santa Cruz Police Department (SCPD) harasses cop-watchers protecting the civil rights of people in protected classes like people of color which has been witnessed by my sister and I but today we were able to video record this harassment. To the point:
This afternoon around 1:30 PM SCPD Officer Bill Azua illegally cited an African American man grouped with other African Americans in downtown Santa Cruz for smoking while my sister and I observed that this man had not been smoking.
Officer Azua took this man aside and ran him for priors also illegally while he was citing him for smoking. I approached Officer Azua while he was detaining this African American man with my video camera. Officer Azua not only refused to identify himself, but also demanded that I move back. I asked Azua how far I needed to move back. Azua responded that I must move so that I [he] couldnt see me.
Clearly this would prevent me from video recording the incident. I moved back five feet then asked Azua is that was far enough. Azua replied,No. I moved back five more feet. Again I asked Azua if I was far back enough. He refused to answer. Another officer came to Azuas side and also refused to identify himself. This incident lasted for several minutes as captured on digital video. As the officers left I video recorded them. The unidentified officer pointed a video camera at me.
The African American men walked away. Azua followed them in his car to Laurel Street fronting the Taco Bell. He was then accompanied by SCPD Officer Ahlers from the Gang and Drug Task force. Azua and Ahlers took an imposing stance watching these men. I asked Officer Ahlers to identify himself. He ignored me. I asked Officer Azua to identify himself. He refused. Azua accused me of harassing them. I asked him if asking for identification constituted harassment. He replied that me talking to police officers when they didnt want to speak with me constituted harassment.
A Pacific Ave, Taco Bell employee walked past Azua while smoking a cigarette. Azua did nothing. After I began video recording this employee, she became angry and began speaking with Azua while she had a burning cigarette in her hand. Azua did not cite her for smoking a cigarette she was Caucasian. The manager of the Taco Bell demanded that I stop video recording his employees from the public sidewalk. I informed him this was legal. He implied that he would have Officer Azua take action against me if I continued to video record.
Minutes later my sister was on the telephone with SCPD Sergeant Jones. this sergeant defended Azuas demand that I move out of sight while video recording. In response to my question about how far cop-watchers should be from SCPD officers while video recording, Jones replied 40-50 feet. I responded that this was too far, that it would prevent any audio recording. I asked Jones what statute or policy supported this. He said it was his opinion.
Officer Azua and another Police Officer in another car continued to circle around the area, following these African American men, apparently to harass them
To clarify the demands and opinions of Azua and Jones, I am making a request under the California Public Records Act (CPRA). I ask for: the most current documents which describe the SCPDs policies about citizens (video) recording SCPD personnel. If these records are available electronically, then I ask that they be made available to me electronically. I am willing to pay a fee of up to $5 for this request. Thank you for providing me records which will shed light on what happened today.
John E. Colby, Ph.D.
#4 Aug 8, 2014
I will fund your info request.
DBS says I never use my trust fund to help anyone. He is wrong. I gladly fund your FOIs.
The Original Buzz
“The buck stops here!”
Since: Sep 12
#5 Aug 8, 2014
Did I just see Hell freeze over?
#6 Aug 8, 2014
Hey I taught John how to write FOIA requests. And CRAs. He is my best student.
#7 Aug 8, 2014
Somebody call the Vatican!!
It's a freaking miracle!!!
Kahnjob parted with a penny!!!
#8 Aug 8, 2014
Then your next step is to sue them against the CPRA (California Public Records Act).
We can't have the police hassling drug dealers in an area known for such.
Maybe my friend Ed Frey can help you with the lawsuit.
Add your comments below
|TBSC-"Stashing the dope bag" with Santa Cruz Po...||2 hr||Sorry Helms||17|
|Kahnjob loses in Court AGAIN||10 hr||Woof||33|
|Indymanure is circling the drain (Dec '15)||Jun 28||No truth at IndyCrap||90|
|Human head, remains found in hills; dead man ma... (Oct '08)||Jun 28||Anonymous 408||25|
|Did FAT Pat get evicted yet?||Jun 28||Woof||4|
|FAT Pat deserves a driveby fruiting (May '13)||Jun 27||Woof||36|
|Art now-Rises-Double symbolism-architecture||Jun 27||ART IS NOW||2|
Find what you want!
Search Santa Cruz Forum Now
Copyright © 2016 Topix LLC