When someone consistently talks sh/t off the top of their head, where is their head?<quoted text>
First, your comments represent YOUR morality--not the morality of everyone. There is no such thing as "classic morality". It's just another contrived term that you enjoy throwing into the conversation
....PROLIFIC POINTLESS PONTIFICATION...
o. I've got news for you, ass-man, you only make yourself look like a fool. If you take a good look at the comments here on this forum you'll see that the only person who seems to agree with you on this topic is "laughing man" or whatever his incarnation is at this point. Way to aim high.
Sixth, I'll leave this discussion between you and Mikey. I have no idea what it is in reference to.
Finally, as an over-the-hill, former pastor who is currently married to a woman who is for all practical purposes "barren", you are involved in a "mutually sterile, pointlessly opposite gendered half of marriage". Using your own definitions, you have no business remaining married. Based on your own morals and values, you should have constantly monitored your wife to know the exact date that she became unable to safely carry or produce children. At that moment, you should have (using your own, contrived definition) moved on to another woman and raised another family. She and your family no longer needed you. You were relieved of your cross-cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior."
1. Look this up; Popular Classic Morality Books
2. We not only accept suppression, we demand it. We do not tolerate the suppression of free speech, even though it may have profound impact on idiots.
Moreover, the recent history of government intervention that claimed only good impact, was in marriage and family.
~No fault divorce; at the horrific expense of children's welfare.
~Abortion; at the expense of 40 million lives and counting.
You make the idiotic claim that a fundamental change of marriage once again forced by government will have NO negative impact.
3. By your definition, the term marriage would be meaningless. There are core details that distinguish marriage. Ss couples fail at every single one of them.
Your assertion that I don't annoy you and your fellow liars is laughable.
4. This is funny; In point three you deny I annoy others, and in point four you give me the power to delete the so called love of strangers!
Thanks for the suggestion about my poem, I'm negotiating with Hallmark right now!
5. Uh, you forgot the mass medical community on my side who is futility spending public money to educate brain analized gays about marginally safe sex...
6. Why DID you feel it necessary to come to Mikey's defense?
Finally, a woman who has borne children is not considered barren. Not to mention the distinction between a medical condition and age, vs the absolute destitution and barrenness of ss couples 100% of the time. You only expose your desperate logical destitution with such silly stupid rants.
Never got a call from Hallmark, have you?