So, a family that involves a single mother who marries a man who then adopts her child and raises it as his own, is goofy? Genetics are SO important that children who are in the foster care system should just stay put because being adopted out would mean that they have no genetic link to either adoptive parent?<quoted text>Traditionally births were to continue to replenish the species, at times children were being conceived to expand families so as to enlarge families to help them survive by adding 'extra hands, but they all wwere born with a common thread-genetics- that tied them ALL together. Long ago it was even dangerous for women to have children but women have the instinct to raise children and took that chance. Your test tube, sperm donor, spunk from a jar has none of that. Two men, maybe one has tied genetics, incubated in a 'rented' womb. Even two women, one with the genetics all of that is for your own narcisstic joy to help amke you believe you're a real parent, and all you are doing is raising a child that some day will learn that they were your selfish project. If you don't think that is going to have negative consequences later in their life then you really are a goof.
You guys LOVE to act as though natural parents ALWAYS provide the best possible environment in which to raise children. We know that this isn't the case when abuse/neglect is involved or where mental health/chemical dependency issues are present.
I think you should pull your head out of your deep, dark recess and get with reality.