Judge overturns California's ban on s...

Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201480 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

Anonymous

Roslyn Heights, NY

#232992 Oct 15, 2014
He said the State should subsidize opposite-sex marriages,, while withholding these subsidies from same-sex relationships, because an opposite sex marriage produces children.
www.clinixworld.net
door knocker

La Puente, CA

#232993 Oct 15, 2014
Oh, good grief not another posting for what this time?
Chris

Temecula, CA

#232994 Oct 15, 2014
and now a word from our sponsor
mackerials

La Puente, CA

#232997 Oct 15, 2014
Oh, good grief not another message from our sponsor?

What is it this time?
Anonymous

Vallejo, CA

#233004 Oct 17, 2014
Donít worry, gays are still horrible sinners
http://blog.sfgate.com/morford/2014/10/16/gay...

Since: Nov 12

Sacramento, CA

#233005 Oct 17, 2014
I'm just wondering if PeePee has recovered from Bruin loss, this was supposed to be his year.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#233006 Oct 17, 2014
A duplicate gender couple is only half of marriage. That's not even close to equal! Even if it is a butch lesbian who is almost a man in a relationship with a lesbian who almost wants a man, they STILL are a far cry from the balance of a man and woman.

And no one has yet explained how two lesbians fit together sexually. There is NOTHING there to fit!!! And please don't put my sphincter muscle in a charlie horse by talking about gay anal abuse... The fact is, literally millions of years have evolved the sexual union of a male and female. Marriage literally, visibly, physically FITS!!!

But the epic failure is the absolute, destitution and barrenness of a ss relationship. It NEVER bears any fruit after its kind! Marriage is the perfect, natural, normal birthplace of society. The best origin of every other relationship is society. It is not just an insult to intelligence to equate a sterile ss couple, it is literally a insult to the PARENTS of ss couples!

This is a silly farce that will never survive manipulated force of law. In fact it has never survived any culture in 8,000 years of human history. We will look back in embarrassment at the idiocy and foolishness.
Dolly

Paradise, CA

#233007 Oct 17, 2014
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Um, no, they didn't. What a really idiotic assertion.
And still only ever, these are obvious facts:
1. The complexity of a diverse gender couple united in marriage.
2. The complementary sexual union of a diverse gender couple.
3. The combined union of two into one through a child.
A ss couple can NEVER through any court ruling or any other means equate to those distinctions. They will always be fatally inferior. Now only all the more obvious...
On the other hand, a interracial couple qualifies for all three distinctions.
The courts have given SS adoptive parents an advantage, if the child doesn't work out they get to take it back.

From the viewpoint of the child, California (Civil Code 227b) is the only state in the union which allows a parent to petition to have an adoption decree annulled on the basis of a disability in the child. The statute provides that if within five years of the final decree the child gives evidence of a developmental disability which is so severe that the child would be considered not adoptable, that the disability was the result of pre-adoption conditions, and that the parents did not know of the condition, then the adoptive parents can ask the court to annul the adoption.(The Legal Rights of Persons with Epilepsy, 1985: 107) That occurred in Christopher C. v. Kay C., 278 Cal. Rptr. 907, when the California Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court decision to grant a petition to set aside an adoption because the child had an undisclosed mental illness.
Mary Downformore

Berkeley, CA

#233008 Oct 17, 2014
Gtve me lesbon or give me lesboff.
Anonymous

Vallejo, CA

#233010 Oct 24, 2014
Pat Robertson calls gay rights activists 'terrorists'
http://news.yahoo.com/anderson-cooper-pat-rob...

Gay community under attack in Liberia over Ebola outbreak
http://news.yahoo.com/gay-community-under-att...

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#233011 Oct 24, 2014
Anonymous wrote:
Pat Robertson calls gay rights activists 'terrorists'
http://news.yahoo.com/anderson-cooper-pat-rob...
Gay community under attack in Liberia over Ebola outbreak
http://news.yahoo.com/gay-community-under-att...
Logical implications of trying to impose unhealthy behaviors on society.

Do you think people should ignore the spread of AIDS???
Sheesh

United States

#233012 Oct 24, 2014
Golly Dolly! Did you bother to have a look at that case? The child was adopted by a Mr. and Mrs. C, not Mr. and Mr. C, not Mrs. and Mrs. C, nor Ms. and Ms. C. Thanks fer playin' along though.
Dolly wrote:
<quoted text>
The courts have given SS adoptive parents an advantage, if the child doesn't work out they get to take it back.
From the viewpoint of the child, California (Civil Code 227b) is the only state in the union which allows a parent to petition to have an adoption decree annulled on the basis of a disability in the child. The statute provides that if within five years of the final decree the child gives evidence of a developmental disability which is so severe that the child would be considered not adoptable, that the disability was the result of pre-adoption conditions, and that the parents did not know of the condition, then the adoptive parents can ask the court to annul the adoption.(The Legal Rights of Persons with Epilepsy, 1985: 107) That occurred in Christopher C. v. Kay C., 278 Cal. Rptr. 907, when the California Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court decision to grant a petition to set aside an adoption because the child had an undisclosed mental illness.
Sheesh

United States

#233013 Oct 24, 2014
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>

Do you think people should ignore the spread of AIDS???
Ol' Ronnie Reagan attempted that approach and look what that did for us. Thankfully we're trying to not do that with Ebola even though there've been some improper protocols exposed recently.
rumors

United States

#233014 Oct 24, 2014
Mayor Manuel Lozano of Baldwin Park would be happy about this.
Cooley

Carson, CA

#233015 Oct 26, 2014
What used to be our favorite Italian restaurant has become a quaint hang out for gay men lately. Loud, rude entitlement crowd flaunting their new status as the latest government protected creeps. Straight flight to find a new favorite place. If you can't stand them....flight.
Anonymous

Vallejo, CA

#233019 Oct 29, 2014
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/science-ne...

Men who had slept with more than 20 women lowered their risk of developing cancer by almost one third, and were 19 per cent less likely to develop the most aggressive form. In contrast, men who slept with 20 men doubled their risk of developing prostate cancer compared with men who have never had sex with another man.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#233020 Oct 29, 2014
When the dust settles, and the twists have spun their webs, this will remain:
Ss couples are fatally inferior to marriage.
A failure of mating behavior that stands epically simplistic next to the complexity of Mars and Venus united.
A sexually depraved union of Uranus and Uranus opposite the perfect and completed union of a man and woman in body, mind and spirit.
And most devastating? The absolute barrenness vainly equating itself to the wonder of human fruit, the literal blend of a man and woman.
And you argue legalities so degraded that stupid looks smart.

There is still no rational rebuttal to these realities.

Since: Nov 12

Sacramento, CA

#233021 Oct 29, 2014
Anonymous wrote:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sci ence/science-news/11192385/Sex -with-21-women-lowers-risk-of- prostate-cancer-academics-find .html
Men who had slept with more than 20 women lowered their risk of developing cancer by almost one third, and were 19 per cent less likely to develop the most aggressive form. In contrast, men who slept with 20 men doubled their risk of developing prostate cancer compared with men who have never had sex with another man.
Good news and the Nevada Brothels just got a boost. Can my Doctor prescribe this?
Sgt Peppers

Gardnerville, NV

#233024 Nov 4, 2014
What happened to the Azusa Hag Beast? Did the police discover what she and three German Shep-HARDs were doing in the dumpster?
NB Simkhada

Kathmandu, Nepal

#233027 Nov 17, 2014
Welcome to Nepal Great Himalaya

Nepal Great Himalaya Trekking is a government registered Trekking company in Nepal. Nepal great Himalaya trekking companies is qualified and experienced professional Trekking Agency in Nepal.

http://nepalgreathimalaya.com/

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Santa Cruz Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Obama health reform turns spotlight on Canada (Aug '09) 13 hr Ismael Gerli 448
News 40-year GM tradition at Marina Motor Co. to end (Aug '08) Thu KAZ 48
News Vagos motorcycle club targeted in Southern Cali... (Mar '06) Jun 20 Rattrapper 4,850
San Manuel Indian Bingo & Casino at 777 San Man... Jun 19 SAN MANUEL INDIAN... 32
Art is now--Double Symbolism-Spring 2018-Santa ... Jun 12 art is now 1
Drugs/Meth/H/oxy30etc Jun 7 Looko 1
Baseline Bowl at 27440 Baseline St. Highland, C... May 31 BASELINE BOWLING ... 80

Santa Cruz Jobs

Personal Finance

Santa Cruz Mortgages