ok . sounds fair. i must of misunderstood you the other day when you stated<quoted text>
I don't need to.
But I have, plenty of times. Either you are slow to understand or you haven't read my previous posts.
Go back and peruse. If you don't feel like it, then just wait for the trial. In addition to the reams of evidence already presented by way of discovery, Special Prosecutor Angela Corey will give you all the Facts and Evidence there is.
""if you've been listening to me for any length of time, you know that people having their day in court doesn't have anything to do with me.
That "presumption of innocence" thing is to be adhered to by the government, not me. I'm free to think as I pleased.
In this case, I know that the Thug Zimmerman went after a child who was minding his own business. I know the Thug went after the child who was running away from him.
I know that Thug Zimmerman went after the innocent child with a loaded weapon.
When you include his lies as well, it tells me that Thug Zimmerman deserves punishment for his crime.
But make no mistake...Thug Zimmerman is guilty of violating the Laws of Morality. Those laws are much higher than the laws of man.
And they carry no "presumption of innocence." Either you are guilty or you're not. It's that simple"".
ok circumstantial if you say so. i guess i will take your word for it based on what.. i dont know.. how exactly do you know that zimmerman is lying.
technically wouldn't trayvon be considered more of a THUG than zimmerman based on his school records.being suspended, graffiti, woman's jewelry in his book bag, along with a screw driver and marijuana. im just asking. only because you keep calling zimmerman a thug.